IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Faut-il moduler les cotisations patronales à l'assurance chômage ?

Listed author(s):
  • Pierre Cahuc
  • Franck Malherbet

[eng] Is it worth introducing experience rating in France? In this paper, we aim at studying the effects of experience rating on a typical european labor market with high firing costs, short term contracts and a binding minimum wage. We show, using a stochastic job matching model, that experience rating is likely to increase employment and to improve economic efficiency on such markets. [fre] Faut-il moduler les cotisations patronales à l'assurance chômage ? L'objet de cet article est d'étudier les conséquences d'une modulation des cotisations patronales à l'assurance chômage sur un marché du travail de type « européen », avec des coûts de licenciement, des emplois à durée déterminée et un salaire minimum. L'étalonnage d'un modèle de flux prenant en compte de telles caractéristiques suggère que la modulation des cotisations patronales est susceptible d'accroître l'emploi et l'efficacité économique sur ce type de marché du travail.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License

File URL:
Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue économique.

Volume (Year): 52 (2001)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 695-703

in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2001_num_52_3_410349
Note: DOI:10.3406/reco.2001.410349
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2001_num_52_3_410349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.