IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recoru/ecoru_0013-0559_1993_num_218_1_4577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paysage et économie : la mise en évidence d'une solution de marché

Author

Listed:
  • François Facchini

Abstract

[fre] L'économiste se doit de choisir une définition qui satisfasse les exigences des sciences sociales. Des trois définitions possibles (scientifique, psychologique et phénoménologique), la dernière sera retenue (Partie 1). Elle permet d'envisager la relation paysage - individu et de montrer qu'il existe une gestion marchande du paysage fondée sur l'échange de droits de propriété sur le sol et sur le choix de localisation de l'individu (Partie 2). Cette gestion marchande n'est cependant pas toujours possible (insolvabilité et épuisement) et suscite une demande de protection sur le marché politique. [eng] Landscape and economics : an emphasis on a market issue . The economist has to choose a definition of landscape which meets the requirements of social sciences. Three definitions are available : the scientific definition, the psychological definition and the phenomenological one (Section 1). The last definition appears to be the most adequate. It allows to study the landscape-individuals relation and to show that there exists a market management of landscape based on the trade of private property rights on the land and on the individual choices of localization (Section 2). But the market management is not always possible (insolvency and exhaustion) and that gives rise to a protection demand on the political market.

Suggested Citation

  • François Facchini, 1993. "Paysage et économie : la mise en évidence d'une solution de marché," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 218(1), pages 12-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_1993_num_218_1_4577
    DOI: 10.3406/ecoru.1993.4577
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecoru.1993.4577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.1993.4577
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecoru_0013-0559_1993_num_218_1_4577
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecoru.1993.4577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arthur Schram & Frans Winden, 1989. "Revealed preferences for public goods: Applying a model of voter behavior," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 259-282, March.
    2. Bergstrom, Theodore C & Goodman, Robert P, 1973. "Private Demands for Public Goods," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(3), pages 280-296, June.
    3. Brookshire, David S, et al, 1982. "Valuing Public Goods: A Comparison of Survey and Hedonic Approaches," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(1), pages 165-177, March.
    4. Harrison, David Jr. & Rubinfeld, Daniel L., 1978. "Hedonic housing prices and the demand for clean air," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 81-102, March.
    5. Clark, David E. & Kahn, James R., 1989. "The two-stage hedonic wage approach: A methodology for the valuation of environmental amenities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 106-120, March.
    6. Hans Groot & Evert Pommer, 1987. "Budgetgames and the private and social demand for mixed public goods," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 257-272, January.
    7. Patrick Point & Brigitte Desaigues, 1990. "Les méthodes de détermination d'indicateurs de valeur ayant la dimension de prix pour les composantes du patrimoine naturel," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 41(2), pages 269-320.
    8. Freeman, A Myrick, III, 1979. " Hedonic Prices, Property Values and Measuring Environmental Benefits: A Survey of the Issues," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 81(2), pages 154-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. François Facchini, 1995. "La qualité de l’environnement, nouvel enjeu de la réforme de la politique agricole commune," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01350619, HAL.
    2. François Facchini, 1997. "Gestion des externalités, droit de propriété et responsabilité civile," Post-Print hal-01377930, HAL.
    3. François Facchini, 2011. "Paysages et théorie (s) du marché," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00637001, HAL.
    4. François Facchini, 2008. "Droit de propriété et gestion des conflits agriculture - environnement," Post-Print hal-00732380, HAL.
    5. Dominique Vollet, 2007. "Politiques agricoles et enjeux paysagers. Analyse sur deux territoires rhône-alpins," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 84, pages 93-112.
    6. Dominique Vollet & Marie-Pierre Arlot, 2007. "Politiques agricoles et enjeux paysagers. Analyse sur deux territoires rhône-alpins," Post-Print hal-01201161, HAL.
    7. Vollet, Dominique & Arlot, Marie-Pierre, 2007. "Politiques agricoles et enjeux paysagers. Analyse sur deux territoires rhône-alpins," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 84.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edwards, Steven F. & Anderson, Glen D., 1984. "Land Use Conflicts in the Coastal Zone: An Approach for the Analysis of the Opportunity Costs of Protecting Coastal Resources," Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Edwards, Steven F. & Anderson, Glen D., 1984. "Land Use Conflicts in the Coastal Zone: An Approach for the Analysis of the Opportunity Costs of Protecting Coastal Resources," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 0(Number 1), pages 1-9, April.
    3. Farber, Stephen, 1998. "Undesirable facilities and property values: a summary of empirical studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Brockmeier, M., 1991. "Entwicklung und Aufhebung von Reinheitsgeboten im Nahrungsmittelbereich – Analyse und Bewertung," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 27.
    5. Smith, Hilary Herbert, 1982. "The demand for and marginal cost of air pollution abatement: an implicit market analysis," ISU General Staff Papers 198201010800009387, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    6. Allali Khalil, 2004. "Environmental Services, Externalities and Agriculture: The Case of Mountain Tourism in Morocco," The Electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vol. 1(1), pages 63-86.
    7. Rose, Steven K., 1999. "Non-Market Valuation Techniques: The State of the Art," Working Papers 127688, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    8. Brookshire, David S, et al, 1982. "Valuing Public Goods: A Comparison of Survey and Hedonic Approaches," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(1), pages 165-177, March.
    9. Won Kim, Chong & Phipps, Tim T. & Anselin, Luc, 2003. "Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 24-39, January.
    10. Randall, Alan, 1982. "Economic Surplus Concepts and Their Use in Benefit Cost Analysis," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(02), pages 1-29, August.
    11. Jon Strand & Mette Vågnes, 2001. "The relationship between property values and railroad proximity: a study based on hedonic prices and real estate brokers' appraisals," Transportation, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 137-156, May.
    12. Saudamini Das & Arup Mitra & Rajnish Kumar, 2017. "Do neighbourhood facilities matter for slum housing? Evidence from Indian slum clusters," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(8), pages 1887-1904, June.
    13. Levy, Amnon, 2003. "Environmental Hazard and Residential Value, Location and Dispersion," Economics Working Papers wp03-16, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
    14. David M. Brasington, 2002. "The Demand for Local Public Goods: The Case of Public School Quality," Public Finance Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 163-187, May.
    15. James C. Murdoch & Morteza Rahmatian & Mark A. Thayer, 1993. "A Spatially Autoregressive Median Voter Model of Recreation Expenditures," Public Finance Review, , vol. 21(3), pages 334-350, July.
    16. Wang, Jianing & Lee, Chyi Lin, 2022. "The value of air quality in housing markets: A comparative study of housing sale and rental markets in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    17. Eugenio Figueroa & George Lever, 1992. "Determinantes del Precio de Mercado de los Terrenos en el Área Urbana de Santiago," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 29(86), pages 99-114.
    18. Liljenstolpe, Carolina, 2011. "Valuation of environmental impacts of the Rural Development Program - A hedonic model with application of GIS," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114383, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Martini, Chiara & Tiezzi, Silvia, 2014. "Is the environment a luxury? An empirical investigation using revealed preferences and household production," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 147-167.
    20. James R. Follain & Emmanuel Jimenez, 1985. "The Demand for Housing Characteristics in Developing Countries," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 22(5), pages 421-432, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_1993_num_218_1_4577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecoru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.