IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recofi/ecofi_0987-3368_2005_num_81_4_4018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les styles de gestion de portefeuille existent-ils ?

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Aaron
  • Isabelle Bilon
  • Sébastien Galanti
  • Yamina Tadjeddine

Abstract

[fre] L’exemple de la multigestion montre l’importance de savoir s’il existe réellement des styles de gestion pouvant différencier les pratiques des gérants. Cet article propose une classification et une analyse des styles de gestion fondées sur un questionnaire adressé aux gérants d’OPCVM. Les auteurs caractérisent six styles (indiciel, stock picking, quantitative, growth, value et sectoriel) en fonction (1) de l’existence d’un indice de référence (benchmark), (2) du rôle de ce benchmark dans la gestion et (3) de la logique de sélection des titres. Les résultats montrent que les fonds ayant un même style ont des caractéristiques (en termes de profil du fonds et du gérant, de sources d’information retenues ou d’impact potentiel sur le marché) homogènes, et distinctes des fonds ayant des styles différents. Les auteurs vérifient également que les styles peuvent expliquer les performances des fonds. . Classification JEL : C42, G11, G23 [eng] Do fund management styles exist ? . A « multi-manager » fund management style needs evidence of distinct management styles. This article uses a questionnaire sent to French equities mutual fund managers. The authors propose to characterize styles according to (1) the use of a benchmark (2) the commitment regarding the benchmark (3) the way stocks are selected. The result gives that six styles present homogeneous characteristics, not only concerning fund returns, but also in terms of organisation, information signals, and market impact. . JEL classification : C42, G11, G23

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Aaron & Isabelle Bilon & Sébastien Galanti & Yamina Tadjeddine, 2005. "Les styles de gestion de portefeuille existent-ils ?," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 81(4), pages 171-188.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2005_num_81_4_4018
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecofi.2005.4018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecofi.2005.4018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecofi_0987-3368_2005_num_81_4_4018
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louis K. C. Chan & Hsiu-Lang Chen & Josef Lakonishok, 2002. "On Mutual Fund Investment Styles," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 15(5), pages 1407-1437.
    2. Kim, Moon & Shukla, Ravi & Tomas, Michael, 2000. "Mutual fund objective misclassification," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 309-323.
    3. Jean-Pierre Berdot & Daniel Goyeau & Jacques Léonard, 2005. "Les fondements de la rotation sectorielle des portefeuilles," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 78(1), pages 345-362.
    4. Daniel Roy, 2005. "Les enjeux de la multigestion," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 79(2), pages 153-164.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giamporcaro, Stephanie, 2011. "A Market for Environmentally Responsible Investment? Identifying Obstacles and Enablers of Commodification of Environmental Risks in the South African Investment Industry," Discussion Papers dp-11-01-efd, Resources For the Future.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C42 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Survey Methods
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • C42 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Survey Methods
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2005_num_81_4_4018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecofi .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.