IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_2009_num_423_1_8021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les pratiques culturelles et sportives des Français : arbitrage, diversité et cumul

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Coulangeon
  • Yannick Lemel

Abstract

[eng] The French 2003 continuous survey of household living conditions includes a “cultural and sports participation” module that covers radio and television consumption, reading, “cultural” outings (such as cinema, theatre, and concerts), amateur activities (drawing, music, singing, writing, and so on), and sports, but also hunting . and fishing. The data show that the social differentiation . of attitudes to recreational activities is primarily determined by an accumulation criterion, which categorises individuals on the basis of the number and frequency of the activities in which they engage. Whatever their purpose and type, most activities do not seem mutually exclusive. People are all the more likely to engage in one if they already engage in another. The only apparent exceptions to this rule are watching television, hunting, . and fishing. An individual’s ranking on the activity-accumulation scale seems more closely correlated with educational attainment than with income level. Differences in attitudes do not, however, appear solely determined by the accumulation criterion. The data . reveal three distinct profiles. They show a contrast between persons who are not significantly engaged in . these activities— with the exception of intensive television-. watching— and two profiles of persons substantially more involved: (1) individuals participating chiefly in . sports activities and (2) individuals participating mainly in cultural activities. The propensity towards each of . the three profiles seems strongly tied to educational . attainment but also to socio-occupational category and living-environment characteristics. There is also a fairly sharp divide between men and women. [fre] Les données du volet «pratiques culturelles et sportives» de l’enquête permanente sur les conditions de vie des ménages de 2003 - qui englobent l’usage de la radio et de la télévision, la lecture, les sorties «culturelles» (cinéma, théâtre, concert, etc.), les pratiques amateurs (dessin, musique, chant, écriture, etc.), les pratiques sportives, mais aussi la chasse ou la pêche - montrent que la différenciation sociale des attitudes en matière de loisirs est d’abord gouvernée par une logique de cumul, qui distingue les individus en fonction du nombre et de la fréquence des activités pratiquées. Quels qu’en soient l’objet et la nature, celles-ci n’apparaissent généralement pas exclusives les unes des autres: on a d’autant plus de chance d’en pratiquer une que l’on pratique déjà l’autre. Seuls l’usage de la télévision, la chasse et la pêche, dont les fréquences sont négativement corrélées aux autres activités, semblent échapper à cette logique. La position occupée sur l’échelle du cumul d’activité apparaît fortement liée au niveau d’éducation, plus qu’au niveau de revenu. La différenciation des attitudes ne se réduit cependant . pas à ce principe de cumul. Trois profils distincts se . dégagent des données. Ils opposent les individus peu investis dans ces activités, à l’exception d’un usage . intensif de la télévision, à deux profils d’individus nettement . plus investis, qui se caractérisent par l’accent mis, pour les uns, sur les activités sportives et, pour les autres, sur les activités culturelles. L’orientation à . l’égard de ces trois profils apparaît à son tour fortement . liée au niveau d’éducation, mais aussi à la catégorie socioprofessionnelle, aux caractéristiques du cadre de vie et elle distingue assez nettement les hommes et les femmes. [ger] Die Daten der Komponente "kulturelle und sportliche Tätigkeiten“ der ständigen Erhebung über die Lebensverhältnisse der Haushalte von 2003, die auch die . Nutzung von Rundfunk und Fernsehen, die Lektüre, die . "kulturellen“ Besuche (Kino, Theater, Konzert usw.), die Aktivitäten von Amateuren (Zeichnen, Musizieren, Singen, Schreiben usw.), sportliche Tätigkeiten, aber auch Jagen und Fischen umfassen, zeigen, dass die soziale Differenzierung der Verhaltensweisen in der Freizeit zunächst einer Kumulationslogik unterliegt, bei der die . Individuen nach der Anzahl und der Häufigkeit ihrer . Tätigkeiten unterschieden werden. Unabhängig von ihrem Gegenstand und von ihrer Art schließen sich diese gegenseitig aber nicht aus: Die Wahrscheinlichkeit, eine Freizeittätigkeit auszuüben, ist umso größer, wenn bereits einer nachgegangen wird. Lediglich das Fernsehen, . die Jagd und das Fischen, deren Häufigkeit in . einem negativen Verhältnis zu den anderen Tätigkeiten steht, scheinen sich dieser Logik zu entziehen. Welcher Platz auf der Skala der Kumulation von Tätigkeiten eingenommen wird, hängt eher vom Bildungs-als vom Einkommensniveau ab. Die Differenzierung der Verhaltensweisen beschränkt sich aber nicht nur auf diesen Kumulationsgrundsatz. . Drei unterschiedliche Profile ergeben sich aus den . Daten: Zum einen die Individuen, die mit Ausnahme einer intensiven Nutzung des Fernsehens kaum solchen . Tätigkeiten nachgehen, und zum anderen zwei Profile . von deutlich aktiveren Individuen, von denen die einen sportlichen Tätigkeiten und die anderen kulturellen Tätigkeiten . nachgehen. Diese drei Profile hängen jeweils in . hohem Maße vom Bildungsniveau ab, aber auch von der sozioprofessionellen Kategorie und den Lebensverhältnissen. Ein deutlicher Unterschied besteht zwischen Männern und Frauen. [spa] Los datos del apartado «prácticas culturales y deportivas» de la encuesta permanente sobre las condiciones de vida de los hogares en 2003 -que abarcan el uso de la radio y la televisión, la lectura, las salidas «culturales. » (cine, teatro, conciertos, etc.), la práctica de aficiones . (dibujo, música, canto, escritura, etc.) y la práctica deportiva, pero también la caza o la pesca– muestran que la diferenciación social de las actitudes en materia de ocio se rige en primer lugar por una lógica de acumulación, que distingue a los individuos en función del número y la frecuencia de actividades practicadas. Sean cuales sean su objeto y naturaleza, en general estas no parecen excluirse unas a otras: existen más posibilidades de practicar una si ya se practica otra. Solo el uso de la televisión, la caza y la pesca, cuyas frecuencias están correlacionadas negativamente con otras actividades, parecen escapar a esta lógica. La posición ocupada en la escala de la acumulación de actividad aparece fuertemente relacionada con el nivel de educación, más que con el nivel de ingresos. La diferenciación de las actitudes no se reduce, no obstante, a este principio de acumulación. De estos datos . destacan tres perfiles distintos. Oponen a los individuos . que invierten poco en estas actividades - con la excepción . del uso intensivo de la televisión–, a dos perfiles de . individuos que invierten claramente más, caracterizados por hacer hincapié, unos, en las actividades deportivas y, otros, en las actividades culturales. La orientación . respecto a estos tres perfiles está, a su vez, fuertemente . relacionada con el nivel educativo, pero también con la categoría socioprofesional y las características del marco de vida, y distingue bastante netamente a hombres y mujeres.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Coulangeon & Yannick Lemel, 2009. "Les pratiques culturelles et sportives des Français : arbitrage, diversité et cumul," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 423(1), pages 3-30.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2009_num_423_1_8021
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.2009.8021
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.2009.8021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2009.8021
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_2009_num_423_1_8021
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.2009.8021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Coulangeon & Yannick Lemel, 2007. "The Cumulativity of Activities," Working Papers 2007-41, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    2. Alain Degenne & Marie-Odile Lebeaux & Catherine Marry, 2002. "Les usages du temps : cumuls d'activités et rythmes de vie," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 352(1), pages 81-99.
    3. Loewenstein, George & Adler, Daniel, 1995. "A Bias in the Prediction of Tastes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 105(431), pages 929-937, July.
    4. Kahneman, Daniel & Knetsch, Jack L & Thaler, Richard H, 1990. "Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(6), pages 1325-1348, December.
    5. Stigler, George J & Becker, Gary S, 1977. "De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(2), pages 76-90, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacobs Martin, 2016. "Accounting for Changing Tastes: Approaches to Explaining Unstable Individual Preferences," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 67(2), pages 121-183, August.
    2. Alex Imas & Sally Sadoff & Anya Samek, 2017. "Do People Anticipate Loss Aversion?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1271-1284, May.
    3. repec:cup:judgdm:v:17:y:2022:i:5:p:988-1014 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ulrich Schmidt & Horst Zank, 2012. "A genuine foundation for prospect theory," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 97-113, October.
    5. Maria Alessandra Antonelli & Valeria De Bonis & Angelo Castaldo & Alessandrao Gandolfo, 2022. "Sin goods taxation: an encompassing model," Public Finance Research Papers 52, Istituto di Economia e Finanza, DSGE, Sapienza University of Rome.
    6. repec:jdm:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:5:p:988-1014 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Munro, Alistair & Sugden, Robert, 2003. "On the theory of reference-dependent preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 407-428, April.
    8. Gintis, Herbert, 2000. "Beyond Homo economicus: evidence from experimental economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 311-322, December.
    9. Christoph Buehren & Marco Plessner, 2020. "IKEA Effect vs. Trophy Effect - An Experimental Comparison," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202037, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    10. Eldar Shafir, 2003. "Context, conflict, weights, and identities: some psychological aspects of decision making," Conference Series ; [Proceedings], Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, vol. 48(Jun).
    11. Kogler, Christoph & Kühberger, Anton & Gilhofer, Rainer, 2013. "Real and hypothetical endowment effects when exchanging lottery tickets: Is regret a better explanation than loss aversion?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 42-53.
    12. Jason Shogren & Gregory Parkhurst & Prasenjit Banerjee, 2010. "Two Cheers and a Qualm for Behavioral Environmental Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 46(2), pages 235-247, June.
    13. Dertwinkel-Kalt, Markus & Köhler, Katrin, 2016. "Exchange asymmetries for bads? Experimental evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 231-241.
    14. Juan José Price Elton, 2016. "Racionalidad económica de la política cultural," Estudios Públicos, Centro de Estudios Públicos, vol. 0(144), pages 165-197.
    15. Horowitz, John K. & McConnell, Kenneth E., 2002. "A Review of WTA/WTP Studies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 426-447, November.
    16. Philip Jones & John Cullis, 2002. "Merit Want Status and Motivation: The Knight Meets the Self-Loving Butcher, Brewer, and Baker," Public Finance Review, , vol. 30(2), pages 83-101, March.
    17. Drichoutis, Andreas C. & Vassilopoulos, Achilleas & Lusk, Jayson L. & Nayga, Rodolfo M. Jr., 2015. "Reference dependence, consequentiality and social desirability in value elicitation: A study of fair labor labeling," 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, March 25-27, 2015, Naples, Italy 202705, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Van Boven, Leaf & Loewenstein, George & Dunning, David, 2003. "Mispredicting the endowment effect:: Underestimation of owners' selling prices by buyer's agents," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 351-365, July.
    19. Drichoutis, Andreas C. & Vassilopoulos, Achilleas & Lusk, Jayson & Nayga, Rodolfo M., 2015. "Fair farming: Preferences for fair labor certification using four elicitation methods," MPRA Paper 62546, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Martinez, Luis F. & Zeelenberg, Marcel & Rijsman, John B., 2011. "Regret, disappointment and the endowment effect," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 962-968.
    21. Mandel, David R., 2002. "Beyond mere ownership: transaction demand as a moderator of the endowment effect," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 737-747, July.
    22. Hoorens, Vera & Remmers, Nicole & van de Riet, Kamieke, 1999. "Time is an amazingly variable amount of money: Endowment and ownership effects in the subjective value of working time," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 383-405, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2009_num_423_1_8021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.