IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlpol/v2022y2022i3id1346p361-382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Konkurence a monopol v předkeynesovské neoklasice a koncepce J. Robinsonové a E. Chamberlina
[Competition and Monopoly in Pre-Keynesian Neoclassicism and the Concepts of J. Robinson and E. Chamberlin]

Author

Listed:
  • Ilona Bažantová
  • Jan Horych

Abstract

The article describes when and in what form the term "monopoly" appeared in theory. First, attention is paid to A. Smith's classical political economy and the neoclassical binary model of competition and monopoly presented by A. Marshall. Robinson's model of imperfect competition and Chamberlin's model of monopolistic competition of 1933 were turning points in economic theory. The article not only highlights the elements that were adopted from Marshall and Pigou of the Cambridge Neoclassical School and are common to both theories, but also emphasizes the aspects in which the approaches of Robinson and Chamberlin differ and highlights their contribution to economic theory and competition law.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilona Bažantová & Jan Horych, 2022. "Konkurence a monopol v předkeynesovské neoklasice a koncepce J. Robinsonové a E. Chamberlina [Competition and Monopoly in Pre-Keynesian Neoclassicism and the Concepts of J. Robinson and E. Chamberl," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(3), pages 361-382.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2022:y:2022:i:3:id:1346:p:361-382
    DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.1346.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.1346.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.polek.1346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geradin, Damien & Layne-Farrar, Anne & Petit, Nicolas, 2012. "EU Competition Law and Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199566563.
    2. Niels, Gunnar & Jenkins, Helen & Kavanagh, James, 2016. "Economics for Competition Lawyers," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780198717652.
    3. Edward H. Chamberlin, 1937. "Monopolistic or Imperfect Competition?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 51(4), pages 557-580.
    4. Joan Robinson, 1934. "What is Perfect Competition?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 49(1), pages 104-120.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marc Cowling & Simon Peter Nadeem, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Firms: With Whom Do They Compete, and Where?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 57(3), pages 559-577, November.
    2. Eduard Hartwich & Alexander Rieger & Johannes Sedlmeir & Dominik Jurek & Gilbert Fridgen, 2023. "Machine economies," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Damien Geradin & Christos Malamataris, 2014. "Application of EU competition law in the postal sector: overview of recent cases," Chapters, in: Michael A. Crew & Timothy J. J. Brennan (ed.), The Role of the Postal and Delivery Sector in a Digital Age, chapter 9, pages 116-130, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Signorino, Rodolfo, 2012. "Edward H. Chamberlin (1899 − 1967)," MPRA Paper 39213, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Christoph Feichter & Frank Moers & Oscar Timmermans, 2022. "Relative Performance Evaluation and Competitive Aggressiveness," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1859-1913, December.
    6. Ruyun (Ivy) Feng & Michael D. Kimbrough & Sijing Wei, 2022. "The role of information transparency in the product market: an examination of the sustainability of profitability differences," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 668-705, June.
    7. Chenyu Yang, 2017. "Could Vertical Integration Increase Innovation?," 2017 Meeting Papers 908, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    8. Parenti, Mathieu & Sidorov, Alexander & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2014. "Revisiting Cournot and Bertrand in the presence of income effects," MPRA Paper 69641, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Bejger, Sylwester, 2015. "Screening for collusion: Evidences from the Indian cement industry," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 11(2), pages 1-19.
    10. Mertens, Matthias, 2023. "Labor Market Power and Between-Firm Wage (In)Equality," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Cordoba, Juan Carlos & Liu, Xiying, 2023. "A Unified Theory of Value: Oligopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity," ISU General Staff Papers 202303231249420000, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. Jacques-François Thisse & Philip Ushchev, 2018. "Monopolistic competition without apology," Chapters, in: Luis C. Corchón & Marco A. Marini (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization, Volume I, chapter 5, pages 93-136, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Luca Zamparelli, 2009. "Average cost and marginal cost pricing in Marshall: Textual analysis and interpretation," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 665-694.
    14. Paolo Bertoletti & Federico Etro, 2022. "Monopolistic competition, as you like it," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 293-319, January.
    15. Jean Guillaume Forand & Vikram Maheshri, 2012. "(De)Regulation and Market Thickness," Working Papers 1202, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics, revised Oct 2012.
    16. Timo Klein & Bertram Neurohr, 2023. "Should Private Exchanges of List Price Information Be Presumed to Be Anticompetitive?," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 33-57, June.
    17. Jakub Chini & Martin Kvizda & Ondřej Špetík, 2023. "What is the real power of incumbents? Case study on the Czech Republic," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 24(1), pages 24-39, March.
    18. Lianos, I. & Motchenkova, E., 2012. "Market dominance and quality of search results in the search engine market," Discussion Paper 2012-036, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
    19. Bullock, J. Bruce, 1981. "Research Priorities in Agricultural Marketing: A Perspective from Academia," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279377, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Bullock, J. Bruce, "undated". "Research Priorities in Agricultural Marketing," Working Papers 256563, University of Missouri Columbia, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Monopoly; imperfect competition; monopolistic competition; competition law;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B22 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Macroeconomics
    • B26 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Financial Economics
    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2022:y:2022:i:3:id:1346:p:361-382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.