IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlpol/v2003y2003i2id402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kultivace institucionálního rámce jako základní přínos vstupu České republiky do Evropské unie
[Cultivation of an institutional framework as a fundamental benefit of integration of the Czech republic into European union]

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Klvačová

Abstract

Since the start of economic transformation, the Czech Republic has been viewed as the country enjoying the best starting position and the best results as regards its economic level and its macroeconomic stabilization, but also as a country where the institutional framework is less adapted to supplying the needs of a market economy than Hungarian or Polish institutional framework. The fact that prior to accession the Czech Republic will have to implement Community directives and other relevant Community acts in its national legislation and that on accession it will be subject not only to Community primary law, but also to secondary legislation (e.g. especially regulations), is of fundamental benefit, even though it cannot be quantified.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Klvačová, 2003. "Kultivace institucionálního rámce jako základní přínos vstupu České republiky do Evropské unie [Cultivation of an institutional framework as a fundamental benefit of integration of the Czech republ," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2003(2), pages 236-253.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2003:y:2003:i:2:id:402
    DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.402.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.402.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.polek.402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Stiglitz, 1999. "Whither Reform? Ten Years of the Transition," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, vol. 7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehrdad Vahabi, 2001. "The Soft Budget Constraint: A Theoretical Clarification," Post-Print hal-00629160, HAL.
    2. Hellman, Joel S. & Jones, Geraint & Kaufmann, daniel, 2000. ""Seize the state, seize the day": state capture, corruption, and influence in transition," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2444, The World Bank.
    3. Klara Sabirianova Peter & Jan Svejnar & Katherine Terrell, 2012. "Foreign Investment, Corporate Ownership, and Development: Are Firms in Emerging Markets Catching Up to the World Standard?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(4), pages 981-999, November.
    4. Daianu, Daniel & Vranceanu, Radu, 2003. "Subduing High Inflation In Romania. How To Better Monetary And Exchange Rate Mechanisms?," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 5-36, September.
    5. Brown, J David & Earle, John, 2001. "Privatization, Competition and Reform Strategies: Theory and Evidence from Russian Enterprise Panel Data," CEPR Discussion Papers 2758, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Catherine Locatelli, 2020. "Une lecture institutionnaliste de la réforme du secteur gazier russe," Working Papers hal-02734835, HAL.
    7. Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2012. "Reforming the power sector in transition: Do institutions matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 1675-1682.
    8. Sudip Ranjan Basu, 2008. "Institution and Development Revisited:A Nonparametric Approach," IHEID Working Papers 05-2008, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies, revised Mar 2008.
    9. Das Gupta, Monica & Grandvoinnet, Helene & Romani, Mattia, 2000. "State-community synergies in development : laying the basis for collective action," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2439, The World Bank.
    10. Vitaliy Zheka, 2005. "Corporate governance, ownership structure and corporate efficiency: the case of Ukraine," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(7), pages 451-460.
    11. Scott Burd & Carolyn Currie, 2004. "Partnering with the Private Sector to Introduce New Physical, Human, and Social Capital - Isolating Criteria for Success," Working Paper Series 133, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    12. Edward Stringham & Peter Boettke, 2006. "The failings of legal centralism for helping stock markets in transition," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(1), pages 22-34.
    13. James Alm & Jorge Martinez‐Vazque & Benno Torgler, 2006. "Russian attitudes toward paying taxes – before, during, and after the transition," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(12), pages 832-857, December.
    14. Robbie Mochrie, 2000. "An Appraisal of Debt Relief for Poor Countries," CERT Discussion Papers 0005, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University.
    15. Schnytzer, Adi & Andreyeva, Tatiana, 2002. "Company performance in Ukraine: is this a market economy?," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 83-98, June.
    16. Kim, Yunhee & Lee, Jeong-Dong & Heshmati, Almas, 2008. "Analysis of Pay Inequality and its Impacts on Growth and Performance in the Korean Manufacturing Industry," IZA Discussion Papers 3774, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Muravyev, Alexander, 2002. "Federal state shareholdings in Russian companies: Origin, forms and consequences for enterprise performance," BOFIT Discussion Papers 12/2002, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    18. Ivanenko, Vlad, 2004. "Searching for the value-subtraction in the Russian economy," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 88-104, March.
    19. Sergii Slukhai & Tetiana Borshchenko, 2019. "Social welfare dynamics in post-socialist countries: unveiling the secrets of success," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 43(2), pages 167-194.
    20. J. David Brown & John S. Earle & Solomiya Shpak & Volodymyr Vakhitov, 2019. "Is Privatization Working in Ukraine?," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 61(1), pages 1-35, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    integration; European Union; institutional framework; Community primary law; secondary legislation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)
    • P21 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2003:y:2003:i:2:id:402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.