IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlcfu/v2025y2025i3id613p4-32.html

A Methodological Proposal for Studying Investors' Materiality Perceptions: Evidence from Share Purchase Agreements
[Metodologický návrh pro studium vnímání materiality investory: důkazy ze smluv o nákupu akcií]

Author

Listed:
  • Ota Novotný
  • Václav Adam

Abstract

Audit materiality is often initially assessed using 'rules of thumb' derived from historical professional experience and industry standards. Given its role in ensuring that auditors provide meaningful service to stakeholders, understanding the perceptions of financial statement users regarding materiality is critical. Building on Vance's (2022) meta-analysis of five decades of empirical research, this study proposes an innovative research design that proxies investors´ materiality thresholds through indemnity basket clauses in Share Purchase Agreements (SPAs). Using a manually compiled dataset of 62 M&A transactions involving Czech target companies completed between 2014 and 2024, hypothetical basket bands ranging from 0.5 % to 1.5 % of deal value-constructed from ranges reported in prior practical legal studies-were recalculated as percentages of Earnings After Tax (EAT) and compared to benchmark materiality levels reported by auditors and investors. A 0.5 % basket corresponds to mean thresholds of 9.2 % of EAT, significantly higher than the 7.85 % mean materiality identified for auditors in Vance's (2022) meta-analysis-suggesting that auditors´ lower materiality thresholds may correspond to greater precision and a finer level of analytical detail than those applied by investors. Two-sample t-tests confirm partial alignment between investor-based benchmarks and empirical results at the 0.5 % basket level, indicating that the proposed research design provides a feasible basis for future empirical studies if detailed data from individual SPAs was made available, while also bridging law, accounting, and finance research by demonstrating how contractual thresholds can serve as observable indicators of investor materiality judgements. The study also highlights the encountered limited transparency of transactional and financial disclosures in the Czech Republic.

Suggested Citation

  • Ota Novotný & Václav Adam, 2025. "A Methodological Proposal for Studying Investors' Materiality Perceptions: Evidence from Share Purchase Agreements [Metodologický návrh pro studium vnímání materiality investory: důkazy ze smluv o nákupu akcií]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2025(3), pages 4-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcfu:v:2025:y:2025:i:3:id:613:p:4-32
    DOI: 10.18267/j.cfuc.613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cfuc.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cfuc.613.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://cfuc.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cfuc.613.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.cfuc.613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eilifsen, Aasmund & Hamilton, Erin L. & Messier, William F., 2021. "The importance of quantifying uncertainty: Examining the effects of quantitative sensitivity analysis and audit materiality disclosures on investors’ judgments and decisions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Karen‐Ann M. Dwyer & Niamh M. Brennan & Collette E. Kirwan, 2023. "Auditor Materiality in Expanded Audit Reports: More (Disclosure) is Less," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(1), pages 31-45, March.
    3. Nicholas J. Hallman & Jaime J. Schmidt & Anne M. Thompson, 2022. "Audit Implications of Non‐GAAP Reporting," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 60(5), pages 1947-1989, December.
    4. Quick, Reiner & Zaman, Mahbub & Mandalawattha, Gihani, 2023. "Auditors' application of materiality: insight from the UK," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 142462, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. Reiner Quick & Mahbub Zaman & Gihani Mandalawattha, 2023. "Auditors’ application of materiality: insight from the UK," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 24-46, January.
    6. David E. Vance, 2022. "A Meta Analysis of Materiality Studies," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(1), pages 1-1, February.
    7. Rachel Glennerster & Yongseok Shin, 2008. "Does Transparency Pay?," IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 55(1), pages 183-209, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elnahass, Marwa & Jia, Xinrui & Crawford, Louise, 2024. "Disruptive technology and audit risks: Evidence from FTSE 100 companies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Combes, Jean-Louis & Minea, Alexandru & Sawadogo, Pegdéwendé Nestor, 2021. "Does the composition of government spending matter for government bond spreads?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 409-420.
    3. Utpal Kumar De & Christopher P. P. Shafuda, 2023. "Performance and Efficiency of Public Sector in Independent Namibia," South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance, , vol. 12(2), pages 160-185, December.
    4. Pintea Mirela-Oana & Achim Sorin Adrian & Lacatus Viorel, 2013. "Transparency Of Local Budgets In The North-West Region Of Romania," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 931-941, July.
    5. Montes, Gabriel Caldas & da Cunha Lima, Luiza Leitão, 2018. "Effects of fiscal transparency on inflation and inflation expectations: Empirical evidence from developed and developing countries," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 26-37.
    6. de Renzio, Paolo & Wehner, Joachim, 2017. "The impacts of fiscal openness," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 82521, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Ruth Carlitz, 2013. "Improving Transparency and Accountability in the Budget Process: An Assessment of Recent Initiatives," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31, pages 49-67, July.
    8. Koonce, Lisa & Mongold, Cassie & Quaid, Laura & White, Brian J., 2024. "Experimental research on standard-setting issues in financial reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Barry Eichengreen, 2009. "From the Asian crisis to the global credit crisis: reforming the international financial architecture redux," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Pablo Aguilar Perez, 2025. "Gatekeepers of the Market? IMF Surveillance and Sovereign Access to Global Finance," EconomiX Working Papers 2025-32, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    11. Claudio Columbano, 2022. "Measuring fiscal guidance transparency," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 46(2), pages 261-296.
    12. Yaowen Shan & Sue Wright, 2023. "Editorial," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(1), pages 3-4, March.
    13. Scheubel, Beatrice & Tafuro, Andrea & Vonessen, Benjamin, 2018. "Stigma? What stigma? A contribution to the debate on financial market effects of IMF lending," Working Paper Series 2198, European Central Bank.
    14. Montes, Gabriel Caldas & Nicolay, Rodolfo & Pereira, Flavio, 2022. "Does fiscal sentiment matter for sovereign risk?," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 18-30.
    15. Jesus Gonzalez-Garcia, 2024. "Data transparency and sovereign financing conditions," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 66(4), pages 1735-1755, April.
    16. Elif Arbatli & Julio Escolano, 2015. "Fiscal Transparency, Fiscal Performance and Credit Ratings," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 36, pages 237-270, June.
    17. Nam Kyu Kim, 2018. "Transparency and currency crises," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 394-422, November.
    18. Lasse Aaskoven, 2016. "Fiscal Transparency, Elections and Public Employment: Evidence from the OECD," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 317-341, November.
    19. Brandao-Marques, Luis & Gelos, Gaston & Melgar, Natalia, 2018. "Country transparency and the global transmission of financial shocks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 56-72.
    20. Beatrice D. Scheubel & Andrea Tafuro & Benjamin Vonessen, 2018. "STIGMA? WHAT STIGMA? A Contribution to the Debate on the Effectiveness of IMF Lending," CESifo Working Paper Series 7036, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcfu:v:2025:y:2025:i:3:id:613:p:4-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.