IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Tax mix impact on the growing differences between the tax quota of the Czech Republic and Slovakia

  • Kveta Kubatova

    ()

    (University of Finance and Administration)

Registered author(s):

    Two new states, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, came into existence upon the division of one country in 1993, and these states implemented a new tax system in the same year. The tax system was legalized in 1992 and that is why the taxes of the two states were originally almost identical. However, many amendments of tax laws took place as soon as in 1993 and gradually, in spite of the tax harmonization process of the EU, the gap between the tax systems of the Czech Republic and Slovakia has widened. The paper aims at analyzing the growing differences in tax revenues (or in the tax burden of the two economies) and at finding out which taxes contribute the most to the growing differences. The method of breaking down the difference between the quotas to items - individual taxes - according to the classification used by Eurostat has been selected.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.vsfs.cz/periodika/acta-2008-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by University of Finance and Administration in its journal ACTA VSFS.

    Volume (Year): 2 (2008)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 189-196

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:prf:journl:v:2:y:2008:i:2:p:189-196
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Estonsk√° 500/3, 101 00 Praha 10
    Phone: (+420) 210 088 800
    Fax: (+420) 271 741 597
    Web page: http://www.vsfs.cz/
    Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. European Commission, 2011. "Taxation trends in the European Union: 2011 edition," Taxation trends 2011, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    2. European Commission, 2013. "Taxation trends in the European Union: 2013 edition," Taxation trends 2013, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prf:journl:v:2:y:2008:i:2:p:189-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Helena Hakenova)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.