IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v71y2017p13-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base In The Eu - A New Phased Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela GONDOR

    (Associate professor, PhD. "Petru Maior" University of Tirgu Mures, Faculty of Economics, Law and Administrative Sciences, ROMANIA.)

Abstract

: As the previous endeavors by the European Commission to submit the Common Corporate Tax Base (CCTB) have failed, and new aspects have arisen that increases the demand for a common viewpoint to corporate taxation in the European Union Member States, the Commission announced in October 2016 to re-launch the proposal-directive for a common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB). Therefore, the paper discusses various parts of the fiscal policy reforms in the European Union, to promote the fiscal harmonization, with regard to the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base. The study focuses on the issues of the two-phase approach of the CCCTB, which will substantially reform corporate taxation throughout the EU, to ensure fiscal responsibility at the national and European level, to upgrade the business environment in the European single market, by molding EU tax law simpler. The aim of the study is to present the main measures of the reform, to compare the 2011 proposal with the new phased approach, and to analyze the pros and the cons. The main objective of this paper is to back up a statement on the design of the CCCTB with the comprehensive analysis in order to contribute to the finding of a European solution to the new matters in the present day settled international tax rules. The paper uses actual official data from European Union database, Eurostat, and national authorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela GONDOR, 2017. "The Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base In The Eu - A New Phased Approach," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 71, pages 13-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:71:y:2017:p:13-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj17/recjurid174_1F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. European Commission, 2017. "Taxation trends in the European Union: 2017 edition," Taxation trends 2017, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Lukáčová & Jaroslav Korečko & Sylvia Jenčová & Mária Jusková, 2020. "Analysis of selected indicators of tax competition and tax harmonization in the EU," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(1), pages 123-137, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cláudia Braz & Maria Manuel Campos & Sharmin Sazedj, 2019. "The new ESCB methodology for the calculation of cyclically adjusted budget balances: an application to the Portuguese case," Economic Bulletin and Financial Stability Report Articles and Banco de Portugal Economic Studies, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    2. Agnieszka Szczypińska, 2019. "What drives the VAT gap in the European Union?," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 55, pages 69-82.
    3. Anna Krajewska, 2019. "Opodatkowanie konsumpcji, pracy i kapitału w krajach Unii Europejskiej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 41-63.
    4. Charanwanitwong, Thanaphon & Fraszczyk, Anna, 2018. "Rail liberalisation in Europe and lessons for Thailand: Policy makers vs. academic views," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 421-440.
    5. Jude Darmanin, "undated". "The Financing of Companies in Malta," CBM Policy Papers PP/04/2017, Central Bank of Malta.
    6. Nicodeme Gaetan & Caiumi Antonella & Majewski Ina, 2018. "What Happened to CIT Collection? Solving the Rates-Revenues Puzzle," Taxation Papers 74, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    7. Olga Yuryevna Bakaeva* & Eugeniy Gennadyevich Belikov & Elena Vacheslavovna Pokachalova & Vasily Valeryevich Popov & Margarita Byashirovna Razgildieva, 2018. "Implementing the Principles of the Social State in Tax Law within the Context of the Digital Economy," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 61-66:3.
    8. Sijbren Cnossen, 2018. "Corporation taxes in the European Union: Slowly moving toward comprehensive business income taxation?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(3), pages 808-840, June.
    9. Paolo Caro, 2020. "Decomposing Personal Income Tax Redistribution with Application to Italy," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 18(1), pages 113-129, March.
    10. European Commission, 2017. "Tax Policies in the European Union: 2017 Survey," Taxation Survey 2017, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    11. Daniela Penu, 2016. "Indirect Taxes in Romania – an Econometric Analysis," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 2(1), pages 121-128, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European fiscal harmonization; corporate taxation; EU corporate tax code; Common Consolidated Tax Base;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K34 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Tax Law
    • H87 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - International Fiscal Issues; International Public Goods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:71:y:2017:p:13-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.