IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0355278.html

Barriers to accessing paediatric critical care and surgery: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine El Zerbi
  • Emer Cullen
  • Elaine Bidmead
  • Helena-Ulrike Marambio
  • Rachel Agbeko
  • Julie Bloomfield
  • Judith Rankin

Abstract

Background: Certain groups of children and young people (CYP) living in the North East and North Cumbria (NENC) present late to paediatric critical care (PCC) and surgery in children (SIC) services, resulting in poorer clinical outcomes. This suggests inequitable access; however, the factors influencing access to these services are presently unclear. Aim: To explore inequitable access to PCC and SIC for CYP and inform recommendations for service improvement. Design: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Setting: Community settings in NENC, United Kingdom. Participants: CYP with experience of PCC/SIC, their caregivers, healthcare professionals, and charity staff. Analysis: Data were analysed using a combined deductive-inductive approach, informed by the UK Paediatric Critical Care Society Quality Standards. Results: Barriers to access were grouped into three categories: communication, system-level, and socio-economic factors. Communication and system-level barriers align with existing quality standards, whereas socio-economic influences are not explicitly addressed but play a significant role in shaping access for some families. Conclusion: Access to PCC and SIC is shaped by interacting communication, system, and socio-economic factors that may delay timely care. Greater recognition of socio-economic influences within service standards and policy may support more equitable access. Further research should focus on improving engagement with CYP and caregivers from underrepresented groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine El Zerbi & Emer Cullen & Elaine Bidmead & Helena-Ulrike Marambio & Rachel Agbeko & Julie Bloomfield & Judith Rankin, 2026. "Barriers to accessing paediatric critical care and surgery: A qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355278
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0355278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355278
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0355278&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0355278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Goddard & Peter Smith, 1998. "Equity of access to health care," Working Papers 032cheop, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sofia Löfvendahl & Anna Jöud & Ingemar F. Petersson & Elke Theander & Åke Svensson & Katarina Steen Carlsson, 2018. "Income disparities in healthcare use remain after controlling for healthcare need: evidence from Swedish register data on psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(3), pages 447-462, April.
    2. Marty Makinen & Stephanie Sealy & Ricardo A. Bitrán & Sam Adjei & Rodrigo Muñoz, 2011. "Private Health Sector Assessment in Ghana," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 5956.
    3. Alice sanwald & Engelbert Theurl, 2014. "What drives out-of pocket health expenditures of private households? - Empirical evidence from the Austrian household budget survey," Working Papers 2014-04, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    4. Brian Ferguson, 1998. "Shaping up to improve health: the strategic leadership role of the new Health Authority," Working Papers 162chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    5. Shengelia, Bakhuti & Tandon, Ajay & Adams, Orvill B. & Murray, Christopher J.L., 2005. "Access, utilization, quality, and effective coverage: An integrated conceptual framework and measurement strategy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 97-109, July.
    6. Maria Goddard, 2008. "Quality in and Equality of Access to Healthcare Services in England," Working Papers 040cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    7. Katharina Hauck & Rebecca Shaw & Peter C. Smith, 2002. "Reducing avoidable inequalities in health: a new criterion for setting health care capitation payments," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(8), pages 667-677, December.
    8. Tountas, Yannis & Karnaki, Panagiota & Pavi, Elpida & Souliotis, Kyriakos, 2005. "The "unexpected" growth of the private health sector in Greece," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 167-180, October.
    9. Shadi Maleki & Nathaniel Dede-Bamfo & Elizabeth Ekren & Milad Mohammadalizadehkorde & Melinda Villagran, 2024. "Mapping Access to Children’s Hospitals in Texas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Propper, Carol, 2000. "The demand for private health care in the UK," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 855-876, November.
    11. Toby Freeman & Sara Javanparast & Fran Baum & Anna Ziersch & Tamara Mackean, 2018. "A framework for regional primary health care to organise actions to address health inequities," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(5), pages 567-575, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0355278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.