IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0341298.html

On the relationship of perceived inequality and policy preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Abraham Aldama
  • Cristina Bicchieri
  • Jana Freundt

Abstract

This paper investigates the determinants of individuals’ support for redistribution in the US from a behavioral perspective. In a comprehensive survey experiment with a large sample of US Americans, we identify participants’ (mis-)perceptions about income inequality together with their policy preferences and fairness views. US Americans underestimate the income earned by people at the bottom of the distribution and overestimate the income of top earners. There is no evidence for a causal effect of perceived inequality on policy views or political behavior. We find precisely estimated and robust null effects across different types of inequality beliefs and across different measures of support for redistribution. The null effect holds for different income groups and party affiliations, as well as for participants with different levels of trust in government and of perceived autonomy. Taken together, our results do not offer support for information about the extent of inequality being able to increase support for redistributive policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Abraham Aldama & Cristina Bicchieri & Jana Freundt, 2026. "On the relationship of perceived inequality and policy preferences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341298
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341298
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0341298&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0341298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0341298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.