IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0339122.html

Research on the threshold of the supply and demand of ecosystem services

Author

Listed:
  • Huangwei Deng
  • Zhenliang Liao
  • Xuefei Zhou

Abstract

The ecological threshold has not yet formed a unified definition, and there is no definition for “the threshold of the supply and demand of ecosystem services (TrSD)”, leading to no limitation of the negative impact of production and life behavior on the supply and demand of ecosystem services. This study defined and set TrSD, and took Urumqi as an example to carry out a case study. Firstly, the concept of TrSD was elaborated referred to multiple definitions of the ecological threshold based on “the difference between the supply and demand of ecosystem services (ESr)”. Then, the geographical simulation and optimization system- future land use simulation (GeoSOS-FLUS) software was used to simulate future land use. After that, the Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) matrix model was applied to calculate ESr. Finally, the TrSD was determined via the inflection point analysis of ESr. This study concludes that the proposed TrSD and its systematic calculation method are innovative and rational. The results can be used for ecosystem service management and ecological valuation, which helps the sustainability progress of the global.

Suggested Citation

  • Huangwei Deng & Zhenliang Liao & Xuefei Zhou, 2026. "Research on the threshold of the supply and demand of ecosystem services," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(2), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339122
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0339122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339122
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0339122&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0339122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0339122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.