IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335506.html

Leaders in the global banking network: Analysis of the Bank for International Settlements network data

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Bonato
  • Juan Chavez Palan
  • Adam Szava

Abstract

Prior work on networks derived from the Bank for International Settlements (or BIS) focused on centrality measures such as degree, betweenness, and DebtRank, with less attention given to adversarial network models. In this work, we address this gap by introducing an adversarial network-based method to locate influential countries within the global banking network. We analyze BIS data from 2000 to 2015, modeling countries as nodes and lending relationships as weighted, directed edges. We study low-key leaders, which are countries with outsize influence despite lower centrality, and highly exposed nodes, which are countries most vulnerable to defaults. Using the Common Out-neighbor (or CON) score with PageRank, we quantify each country’s influence and exposure, and define a measure of low-key leader strength. Our results show that low-key leaders, such as those in the United States and Mexico, possess strong influence with lower exposure to contagion, whereas highly exposed leaders, like those in Germany and the United Kingdom after 2003, maintain broad lending portfolios that heighten vulnerability. We also examine these roles over time, including the United States’ loss of low-key leader status after the 2008 financial crisis. Our analysis of low-key leaders and highly-exposed nodes provides new insights into systemic risk within the BIS network.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Bonato & Juan Chavez Palan & Adam Szava, 2025. "Leaders in the global banking network: Analysis of the Bank for International Settlements network data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335506
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335506
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335506&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335506?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Bardoscia & Stefano Battiston & Fabio Caccioli & Guido Caldarelli, 2015. "DebtRank: A Microscopic Foundation for Shock Propagation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abhijit Chakraborty & Tobias Reisch & Christian Diem & Pablo Astudillo-Estévez & Stefan Thurner, 2024. "Inequality in economic shock exposures across the global firm-level supply network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Roncoroni, Alan & Battiston, Stefano & D’Errico, Marco & Hałaj, Grzegorz & Kok, Christoffer, 2021. "Interconnected banks and systemically important exposures," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. X. Zhang & L. D. Valdez & H. E. Stanley & L. A. Braunstein, 2019. "Modeling Risk Contagion in the Venture Capital Market: A Multilayer Network Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-11, December.
    4. Yoshi FUJIWARA & Masaaki TERAI & Yuji FUJITA & Wataru SOUMA, 2016. "DebtRank Analysis of Financial Distress Propagation on a Production Network in Japan," Discussion papers 16046, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    5. Silva, Thiago Christiano & Tabak, Benjamin Miranda & Guerra, Solange Maria, 2017. "Why do vulnerability cycles matter in financial networks?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 592-606.
    6. Fabio Caccioli & Paolo Barucca & Teruyoshi Kobayashi, 2018. "Network models of financial systemic risk: a review," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 81-114, January.
    7. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1nlv566svi86iqtetenms15tc4 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Chiara Perillo & Stefano Battiston, 2020. "Real implications of Quantitative Easing in the euro area: a complex-network perspective," Papers 2004.09418, arXiv.org.
    9. Caceres-Santos, Jonnathan & Rodriguez-Martinez, Anahi & Caccioli, Fabio & Martinez-Jaramillo, Serafin, 2020. "Systemic risk and other interdependencies among banks in Bolivia," Latin American Journal of Central Banking (previously Monetaria), Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    10. Preben Forer & Barak Budnick & Pierpaolo Vivo & Sabrina Aufiero & Silvia Bartolucci & Fabio Caccioli, 2025. "Financial instability transition under heterogeneous investments and portfolio diversification," Papers 2501.19260, arXiv.org.
    11. Michel Alexandre & Thiago Christiano Silva & Colm Connaughton & Francisco A. Rodrigues, 2021. "The Role of (non-)Topological Features as Drivers of Systemic Risk: a machine learning approach," Working Papers Series 556, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    12. Hayato Goto & Hideki Takayasu & Misako Takayasu, 2017. "Estimating risk propagation between interacting firms on inter-firm complex network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, October.
    13. Valentina Macchiati & Giuseppe Brandi & Tiziana Di Matteo & Daniela Paolotti & Guido Caldarelli & Giulio Cimini, 2022. "Systemic liquidity contagion in the European interbank market," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 17(2), pages 443-474, April.
    14. João Barata Ribeiro Blanco Barroso & Thiago Christiano Silva & Sergio Rubens Stancato de Souza, 2016. "Decomposition of Systemic Risk Drivers in Evolving Financial Networks," Working Papers Series 448, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    15. Yan, Chun & Ding, Yi & Liu, Wei & Liu, Xinhong & Liu, Jiahui, 2023. "Multilayer interbank networks and systemic risk propagation: Evidence from China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 628(C).
    16. Hamed Amini & Zachary Feinstein, 2020. "Optimal Network Compression," Papers 2008.08733, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    17. Silva, Thiago Christiano & Guerra, Solange Maria & Tabak, Benjamin Miranda, 2020. "Fiscal risk and financial fragility," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    18. Marco Bardoscia & Ginestra Bianconi & Gerardo Ferrara, 2019. "Multiplex network analysis of the UK over‐the‐counter derivatives market," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 1520-1544, October.
    19. Gian Paolo Clemente & Rosanna Grassi & Chiara Pederzoli, 2020. "Networks and market-based measures of systemic risk: the European banking system in the aftermath of the financial crisis," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 15(1), pages 159-181, January.
    20. Carro, Adrian & Stupariu, Patricia, 2024. "Uncertainty, non-linear contagion and the credit quality channel: An application to the Spanish interbank market," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    21. Marco Bardoscia & Paolo Barucca & Adam Brinley Codd & John Hill, 2017. "The decline of solvency contagion risk," Bank of England working papers 662, Bank of England.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.