IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0331923.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency analysis of 67 Chinese research universities considering inter-university heterogeneity: Evidence from a meta-frontier network SBM DEA model

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Cheng

Abstract

With the continuous increase in technology research and development investment, the overall operational efficiency of universities as the main body of scientific research has always been a focus of research. This study evaluates the efficiency of technology transfer in 67 Chinese universities directly affiliated with the Ministry of Education from 2016 to 2020. By integrating the meta-frontier analysis with the network Slacks-based Measure (SBM) Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach, we assess the overall efficiency, stage-specific efficiency, and sources of inefficiency across different types of universities. Results indicate that while some institutions operate at the optimal frontier, the overall efficiency remains moderate, with the Technology Transfer and Application (TTA) stage consistently underperforming compared to the R&D stage. Significant heterogeneity exists among university types: normal, and medical & pharmaceutical universities demonstrate higher efficiency levels, whereas comprehensive, science and engineering, and agricultural and forestry universities exhibit notable inefficiencies, particularly in the TTA stage. Further decomposition reveals that technological gaps are the dominant source of inefficiency, especially in the later stage of the innovation process. Based on these findings, we propose targeted policy recommendations aimed at improving infrastructure, enhancing management practices, and tailoring reform strategies according to institutional type. This study contributes to the understanding of internal inefficiencies in university-led technology transfer and provides practical insights for policymakers and university administrators seeking to enhance the commercialization of academic research.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Cheng, 2025. "Efficiency analysis of 67 Chinese research universities considering inter-university heterogeneity: Evidence from a meta-frontier network SBM DEA model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331923
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331923
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331923&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0331923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.