IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0330159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transforming multi-stakeholder engagement towards coproduction of optimized maternal, newborn, and child health and a resilient community health system in rural Ethiopia: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Akalewold T Gebremeskel
  • Ogochukwu Udenigwe
  • Josephine Etowa
  • Sanni Yaya

Abstract

Introduction: In Ethiopia, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health (MNCH) outcomes have been improving, however, the current level of Maternal and under-five children mortality remains the highest in the world. Despite the rhetoric around the significance of multi-stakeholder engagement as a buzzword in development theories and polices to improve health and other development outcomes, there is limited evidence on how multi-stakeholders intersect and mutually reinforce each other toward the coproduction of improved MNCH outcomes and a resilient community health system. The aim of this manuscript is to examine barriers to and facilitators of coproduction in the context of multi-stakeholder engagement to optimize MNCH outcomes and a resilient community health system in rural Ethiopia. Methods: We conducted a qualitative case study in West Shewa Zone, rural Ethiopia. A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit participants. Data sources were two focus groups discussions with CHWs, twelve key informant interviews with multilevel public health policy actors, and a policy document review related to the CHW program to triangulate the finding. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data was conducted. Our study was informed by multiple theoretical frameworks including the World Health Organization’s building block framework, state- society synergy model to inform the research processes and analysis. Results: In the context of multi-stakeholder approach, our analysis revealed the multilevel barriers to and facilitators of coproduction in the community health landscape in rural Ethiopia. The major barriers of coproduction include lack of vertical and horizontal alignment, lack of continuum of and sustainable engagement practice,lack of systemic coordination platforms, and Inadequate coordination and implementation capacity. Major facilitators of coproduction include embedded integrated community health system, promising macro-level multi-stakeholder and community-level engagement and coproduction aspects. Conclusions: Our study reveals mixed policy and practice-related results, the current multi-stakeholder engagement is necessary but insufficient and fragmented to coproduce optimized MNCH outcomes and ensure a resilient health system in rural Ethiopia. Moving beyond the current multi-stakeholder engagement as a buzzword in health polices to practice through, embracing meaningful coproduction frameworks is fundamental while building on multi-stakeholder engagement efforts to optimize MNCH outcomes and a resilient community health system. A coproduction framework leverages the intersection and mutual reinforcement of multi-stakeholder synergy throughout the CHWs’ program cycle through shared power and joint assessment, planning, implementing, decision making and evaluating. Fostering effective multi-stakeholder engagement synergy requires balanced shared power, alignment to community priorities, systemic mapping, coordination and monitoring, and continuum and sustainability of engagement strategies. Beyond donor initiatives and a dependency approach, proactive health diplomacy strategies are also important to sustain the existing and attract new actors to realize sustainable positive health outcomes and a resilient community health policy and strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Akalewold T Gebremeskel & Ogochukwu Udenigwe & Josephine Etowa & Sanni Yaya, 2025. "Transforming multi-stakeholder engagement towards coproduction of optimized maternal, newborn, and child health and a resilient community health system in rural Ethiopia: A qualitative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330159
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330159
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0330159&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0330159?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Freeman, R. Edward, 1994. "The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions1," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 409-421, October.
    2. Evans, Peter, 1996. "Introduction: Development strategies across the public-private divide," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 1-1, June.
    3. Ostrom, Elinor, 1996. "Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 1073-1087, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Edevbaro, 1997. "Promoting Education within the Context of a Neo-Patrimonial State: The Case of Nigeria," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1997-123, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Manisha Verma & Anurag Priyadarshee, 2015. "Improving Service Delivery through State–Citizen Partnership: The Case of the Ahmedabad Urban Transport System," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 321-336, June.
    3. Lorenzo Dorigo & Giuseppe Marcon, 2014. "A caring interpretation of stakeholder management for the social enterprise. Evidence from a regional survey of micro social cooperatives in the Italian welfare mix," Working Papers 01, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    4. Rodrigo Canales, 2011. "Rule bending, sociological citizenship, and organizational contestation in microfinance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(1), pages 90-117, March.
    5. Rebecca Tiessen & Sheila Rao & Benjamin J. Lough, 2021. "International Development Volunteering as Transformational Feminist Practice for Gender Equality," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 37(1), pages 30-56, March.
    6. Edevbaro, Daniel, "undated". "Promoting Education within the Context of a Neo-Patrimonial State The Case of Nigeria," WIDER Working Papers 295447, United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Ackerman, John, 2004. "Co-Governance for Accountability: Beyond "Exit" and "Voice"," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 447-463, March.
    8. Falleti, Tulia G. & Cunial, Santiago L. & Sotelo, Selene Bonczok & Crudo, Favio, 2024. "State and NGO coproduction of health care in the Gran Chaco," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Molinas, JoseR., 1998. "The impact of inequality, gender, external assistance and social capital on local-level cooperation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 413-431, March.
    10. Jacob Torfing & Eva Sørensen, 2019. "Interactive Political Leadership in Theory and Practice: How Elected Politicians May Benefit from Co-Creating Public Value Outcomes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Jane Freedman & Tamaryn L. Crankshaw & Yasmin Rajah & Victoria Marcia Mutambara, 2024. "“But We Just Need Money”: (Im)Possibilities of Co‐Producing Knowledge With Those in Vulnerable Situations," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    12. Ruben Burga & Davar Rezania, 2016. "Stakeholder theory in social entrepreneurship: a descriptive case study," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Anthony Bennett, 1998. "Sustainable public/private partnerships for public service delivery," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 22(3), pages 193-199, August.
    14. Valentina Burksiene & Jaroslav Dvorak & Mantas Duda, 2019. "Upstream Social Marketing for Implementing Mobile Government," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, July.
    15. Brian Dill, 2010. "Public-public partnerships in Urban water provision: The case of Dar es Salaam," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(5), pages 611-624.
    16. Wei Peng & Baogui Xin & Yekyung Kwon, 2019. "Optimal Strategies of Product Price, Quality, and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Eggers, Jorg & Laschewski, Lutz & Schleyer, Christian, 2005. "Agri-Environmental Policy: Understanding the Role of Regional Administration," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24496, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    19. WANG Jifu & GUPTA Vipin & LYBOLT Liza & WANG Xiuli, 2022. "Corrected Game Model In Csr: Mnc Strategies And Chinese Practice," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 17(3), pages 269-287, December.
    20. Müllner, Jakob & Puck, Jonas, 2018. "Towards a holistic framework of MNE–state bargaining: A formal model and case-based analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 15-26.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0330159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.