IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0329633.html

A cross-country analysis of feasible income equality using the sigmoid function and the Boltzmann distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Thitithep Sitthiyot
  • Kanyarat Holasut

Abstract

This study uses the sigmoid function in combination with the Boltzmann distribution, originally developed by Park and Kim (2021), in order to calculate the optimal income distribution that represents feasible income equality and maximizes total social welfare. Feasible income equality refers to optimal income distribution that is realistically attainable. By employing the data on quintile income shares and the Gini index of 71 countries in 2021 from the World Bank, the results indicate that the optimal income distributions representing feasible income equality, the corresponding values of the Gini index, and the respective shapes of the Lorenz curves of 71 countries are somewhat similar to each other. These results confirm Park and Kim (2021)’s conjecture in that the universal feasible equality line, as depicted by the Lorenz curve, can be identified and applied across multiple countries, potentially serving as a quantitative benchmark. In addition, this study finds that the correlations between the quality of economic and political institutions and the difference between actual and optimal income distributions are negative, suggesting that the better the quality of economic and political institutions is, the closer the gap between actual and optimal income distributions representing feasible income equality. Furthermore, this study estimates the relationship between actual quintile income shares and optimal quintile income shares representing feasible income equality of 71 countries which can be conveniently used to find any approximate level of feasible income share for a particular level of actual income share. Given that high income inequality is associated with health, social, economic, and environmental problems, the overall findings from this study could be useful for designing income redistributive policies and measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Thitithep Sitthiyot & Kanyarat Holasut, 2025. "A cross-country analysis of feasible income equality using the sigmoid function and the Boltzmann distribution," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329633
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329633
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329633&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0329633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sitthiyot, Thitithep & Budsaratragoon, Pornanong & Holasut, Kanyarat, 2020. "A scaling perspective on the distribution of executive compensation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 543(C).
    2. Ji-Won Park & Chae Un Kim, 2021. "Getting to a feasible income equality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Scully, Gerald W, 2003. "Optimal Taxation, Economic Growth and Income Inequality," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 115(3-4), pages 299-312, June.
    4. Klass, Oren S. & Biham, Ofer & Levy, Moshe & Malcai, Ofer & Solomon, Sorin, 2006. "The Forbes 400 and the Pareto wealth distribution," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 290-295, February.
    5. Robert J. Barro, 2008. "Inequality and Growth Revisited," Working Papers on Regional Economic Integration 11, Asian Development Bank.
    6. Jorge Charles-Coll & Elisabeth L. Mayer Granados, 2017. "How much Inequality is Harmful for Growth? The Growth Maximizing Rate of Inequality in the Context of the Mexican Economy," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 70(3), pages 301-318.
    7. Ji-Won Park & Chae Un Kim, 2020. "Getting to a feasible income equality," Papers 2011.09119, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ji-Won Park & Jaeup U. Kim & Cheol-Min Ghim & Chae Un Kim, 2021. "The Boltzmann fair division for distributive justice," Papers 2109.11917, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    2. Djehiche, Boualem & Gozzi, Fausto & Zanco, Giovanni & Zanella, Margherita, 2022. "Optimal portfolio choice with path dependent benchmarked labor income: A mean field model," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 48-85.
    3. Balisacan, Arsenio M. & dela Cruz, Russel Matthew M., 2021. "When a Pandemic Strikes: Balancing Health and Economy toward Sustainable and Inclusive Recovery," MPRA Paper 111259, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Antonis Tsitouras & Harry Papapanagos, 2026. "Factors Influencing Income Inequality and Inclusive Growth in Greece: A Long-Run and Short-Run Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(1), pages 2889-2919, February.
    5. Dushko, Josheski & Darko, Lazarov & Cane, Koteski, 2011. "Analysis of the optimal size of the government consumption," MPRA Paper 32063, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Jong Woo Kang, 2015. "Interrelation between Growth and Inequality," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 447, Asian Development Bank.
    7. Shenghao Zhu, 2019. "A Becker–Tomes model with investment risk," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(4), pages 951-981, June.
    8. Campolieti, Michele, 2018. "Heavy-tailed distributions and the distribution of wealth: Evidence from rich lists in Canada, 1999–2017," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 263-272.
    9. Jeeban Amgain, 2017. "Estimating Optimal Level of Taxation for Growth Maximization in Asia," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(3), pages 47-55, May.
    10. Agnello, Luca & Mallick, Sushanta K. & Sousa, Ricardo M., 2012. "Financial reforms and income inequality," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 116(3), pages 583-587.
    11. Gruber, Lloyd & Kosack, Stephen, 2014. "The tertiary tilt: education and inequality in the developing world," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 54202, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Daniel Treisman, 2016. "Russia's Billionaires," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 236-241, May.
    13. Djeneba Doumbia, 2019. "The quest for pro-poor and inclusive growth: the role of governance," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(16), pages 1762-1783, April.
    14. Jovanovic, Franck & Schinckus, Christophe, 2016. "Breaking down the barriers between econophysics and financial economics," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 256-266.
    15. Conrad Scheibe, 2016. "Fiscal Consolidations and Their Effects on Income Inequality," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 2016-4, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    16. Datu Buyung Agusdinata & Rimjhim Aggarwal & Xiaosu Ding, 2021. "Economic growth, inequality, and environment nexus: using data mining techniques to unravel archetypes of development trajectories," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6234-6258, April.
    17. Wang, Yuanjun & You, Shibing, 2016. "An alternative method for modeling the size distribution of top wealth," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 457(C), pages 443-453.
    18. Brzezinski, Michal & Sałach, Katarzyna, 2021. "Nierówności dochodowe i majątkowe w Polsce: nowe wyniki wykorzystujące dane pozaankietowe," SocArXiv s43yr, Center for Open Science.
    19. Narayan Sethi & Saileja Mohanty & Sanhita Sucharita & Nanthakumar Loganathan, 2020. "Tax Reform And Economic Growth Nexus In India: Evidence From The Cointegration And Rolling-Window Causality," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 65(06), pages 1699-1725, December.
    20. Chambers, Dustin & Dhongde, Shatakshee, 2016. "Convergence in income distributions: Evidence from a panel of countries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 262-270.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.