IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0327848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Instrumental strategies and symbolic legitimacy: analyzing government information disclosure security policies in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Chen
  • Lianjian Deng

Abstract

This study explores how the Chinese government manages the trade-off between transparency and national security through the design of government information disclosure (GID) security policies. Based on a qualitative analysis of 259 policy documents issued at central, provincial, and prefectural levels between 2007 and 2024, we construct a two-dimensional framework that integrates policy instrument types (supply, environmental, demand) with policy content stages (readiness, implementation, impact). The findings reveal an overreliance on environmental-type instruments—especially during implementation—and underuse of demand-oriented tools that support public participation and accountability. Through the lens of Governmental Power Marketing (GPM), we interpret this instrument selection not only as a technical response but as a symbolic strategy to project institutional competence and legitimacy. This study contributes to digital governance literature by linking content analysis with political communication theory, offering both an analytical framework and comparative insights applicable to other regimes facing similar transparency-security dilemmas.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Chen & Lianjian Deng, 2025. "Instrumental strategies and symbolic legitimacy: analyzing government information disclosure security policies in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327848
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327848
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327848&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0327848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.