IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0327848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Instrumental strategies and symbolic legitimacy: analyzing government information disclosure security policies in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Chen
  • Lianjian Deng

Abstract

This study explores how the Chinese government manages the trade-off between transparency and national security through the design of government information disclosure (GID) security policies. Based on a qualitative analysis of 259 policy documents issued at central, provincial, and prefectural levels between 2007 and 2024, we construct a two-dimensional framework that integrates policy instrument types (supply, environmental, demand) with policy content stages (readiness, implementation, impact). The findings reveal an overreliance on environmental-type instruments—especially during implementation—and underuse of demand-oriented tools that support public participation and accountability. Through the lens of Governmental Power Marketing (GPM), we interpret this instrument selection not only as a technical response but as a symbolic strategy to project institutional competence and legitimacy. This study contributes to digital governance literature by linking content analysis with political communication theory, offering both an analytical framework and comparative insights applicable to other regimes facing similar transparency-security dilemmas.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Chen & Lianjian Deng, 2025. "Instrumental strategies and symbolic legitimacy: analyzing government information disclosure security policies in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327848
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327848
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0327848&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0327848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sue Peattie & Ken Peattie & Robyn Thomas, 2012. "Social Marketing as Transformational Marketing in Public Services," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(7), pages 987-1010, January.
    2. Roy Rothwell & Walter Zegveld, 1984. "An Assessment Of Government Innovation Policies," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 3(3‐4), pages 436-444, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Wu & Yuanjie Zhang & Zhun Shi, 2021. "Crafting a Sustainable Next Generation Infrastructure: Evaluation of China’s New Infrastructure Construction Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Ani MATEI & Corina-Georgiana ANTONOVICI & Carmen SAVULESCU, 2015. "Innovative Public Marketing As Instrument For Creating The Social Value," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(Special i), pages 21-34, September.
    3. Magnus Henrekson & Christian Sandström & Mikael Stenkula, 2024. "Moonshots and the New Industrial Policy: Questioning the Mission Economy," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Magnus Henrekson & Christian Sandström & Mikael Stenkula (ed.), Moonshots and the New Industrial Policy, pages 3-28, Springer.
    4. Zhang, Huiming & Huang, Jiying & Hu, Ruohan & Zhou, Dequn & Khan, Haroon ur Rashid & Ma, Changxian, 2020. "Echelon utilization of waste power batteries in new energy vehicles: Review of Chinese policies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    5. Chunyan Li & Lanqing Ge & Qi Ban & Xiaoting Song, 2025. "Protection of geographical indication products and sustainable agricultural development: The role of public policies," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 71(2), pages 59-70.
    6. Xu, Tao Louie & Hu, Yabei, 2024. "Towards sustainable prosperity? Policy evaluation of Jiangsu advanced manufacturing clusters," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Zhenjie Yang & Canpeng Huang & Fengjie Liao & Fat Iam Lam & Lue Li & Quande Qin & Bi Fan, 2023. "Exploring the Characteristics of Solid Waste Management Policy in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Hui Luo & He Zhang, 2022. "The Mechanism for Matching the Supply Content and Policy Instruments of Resistive Public Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Lin, Chen-Chun & Yang, Chia-Han & Shyua, Joseph Z., 2013. "A comparison of innovation policy in the smart grid industry across the pacific: China and the USA," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 119-132.
    10. Hongjian Yu & Xiufan Zhang, 2024. "Are carbon emissions trading and green financial instruments synergistic? -Comprehensive quantitative research based on content analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-30, March.
    11. Zihao Xu & Xiangyun Chang & Ning Zhang, 2025. "An analysis of China’s power battery industry policy for new energy vehicles from a product life cycle perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 13093-13115, June.
    12. Chen, Kaihua & Xue, Zehua & Guo, Rui & Ning, Lutao, 2025. "The holistic role of multi-level government in transformative innovation process: Theoretical framework and evidence from China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    13. Weisheng Mao & Yexi Zhong, 2024. "The Influence of Demand-Based Policy Instruments on Urban Innovation Quality—Evidence from 269 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Chu-Chi Kuo & Joseph Z. Shyu, 2021. "A Cross-National Comparative Policy Analysis of the Blockchain Technology between the USA and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Guo, Meng & Luo, Danglun & Liu, Chen, 2024. "City civilization, employment creation and talent agglomeration: Empirical evidence from “National Civilized City” policy in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    16. Kuan Chung Lin & Joseph Z. Shyu & Kun Ding, 2017. "A Cross-Strait Comparison of Innovation Policy under Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Development Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Li Cai & Jianhua Xiao & Renxian Zuo, 2025. "Research on the Evolution Characteristics of Policy System That Supports the Sustainability of Digital Economy: Text Analysis Based on China’s Digital Economy Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-31, April.
    18. Xu, Tao & Hu, Yabei, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Prosperity? Policy Evaluation of Jiangsu Advanced Manufacturing Clusters," MPRA Paper 120904, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 May 2024.
    19. Xiaokun Sun, 2024. "Analysis of China’s Smart Elderly Care Service Policy: Based on the Three-dimensional Framework," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, March.
    20. Dong, Feng & Liu, Yajie, 2020. "Policy evolution and effect evaluation of new-energy vehicle industry in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0327848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.