IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0324154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying common trends and ecosystem states to inform Gulf of Alaska ecosystem-based fisheries management

Author

Listed:
  • Bridget E Ferriss
  • Mary E Hunsicker
  • Eric J Ward
  • Michael A Litzow
  • Lauren Rogers
  • Matt Callahan
  • Wei Cheng
  • Seth L Danielson
  • Brie Drummond
  • Emily Fergusson
  • Christine Gabriele
  • Kyle Hebert
  • Russell R Hopcroft
  • Jens Nielsen
  • Kally Spalinger
  • William T Stockhausen
  • Wesley W Strasburger
  • Shannon Whelan

Abstract

Ecosystem-based fisheries management requires the successful integration of ecosystem information into the fisheries management process. In the Northeast Pacific Ocean, ecosystem data collection and accessibility have achieved successful milestones, yet application to the harvest specification process remains challenging. The synthesis, interpretation, and application of ecosystem information to groundfish fisheries management in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) can be supported by the identification of common ecosystem trends and ecosystem states across a diverse set of indicators. In this study, we used Dynamic Factor Analysis (DFA) and hidden Markov models (HMM) to analyze 92 indicators in climate, lower-trophic, mid-trophic, and seabird models for the western and eastern GOA marine ecosystems. Time series ranged from 25 to 52 years in length, analyzed through 2022. The DFA identified common trends across indicators and groups of covarying indicators (e.g., biomass of zooplankton species), highlighting opportunities to streamline communication of these data to management. Non-stationarity analyses revealed past changes in relationships, and can provide early warnings in future annual updates if previously identified correlations change. The HMM identified two to three ecosystem states in each sub-model that largely aligned with previously observed long- and short-term shifts in ecosystem dynamics in the region (i.e., shifts starting in 1975, 1988, and 2014). Annually updating these analyses, within an existing framework of reporting ecosystem information to management bodies, can streamline communication and improve early warning of changes in ecosystem dynamics. These tools can provide ecosystem support to management decisions relative to groundfish productivity and resulting harvest specifications.

Suggested Citation

  • Bridget E Ferriss & Mary E Hunsicker & Eric J Ward & Michael A Litzow & Lauren Rogers & Matt Callahan & Wei Cheng & Seth L Danielson & Brie Drummond & Emily Fergusson & Christine Gabriele & Kyle Heber, 2025. "Identifying common trends and ecosystem states to inform Gulf of Alaska ecosystem-based fisheries management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324154
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324154
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324154&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0324154?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.