IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0324113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unequal gains from remote work during COVID-19 between spouses: Evidence from longitudinal data in Singapore

Author

Listed:
  • Zeewan Lee
  • Poh Lin Tan
  • Jie-Sheng Tan-Soo

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak and the rise of remote work may have generated distinct labor market outcomes for workers, depending on their occupation and adaptability to changes in the mode of work. Using panel data of married spouses around the time of the government-mandated lockdown in Singapore and difference-in-differences models, we examine the effects of remote work arrangements on salary income, work hours, and wages. We find that the benefits of remote work during the pandemic were not distributed evenly across male and female spouses—translating into longer and significant gains in salary income only for male workers who adopted full remote work arrangements. In contrast, female remote workers’ income gains were limited by disproportionately heavier household responsibilities (i.e., chores), which in turn led to constrained work hours.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeewan Lee & Poh Lin Tan & Jie-Sheng Tan-Soo, 2025. "Unequal gains from remote work during COVID-19 between spouses: Evidence from longitudinal data in Singapore," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-31, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324113
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324113
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0324113&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0324113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0324113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.