IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0322372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social prescribing to improve health and well-being of patients presenting with non-medical health related social needs in primary care: Study protocol of a multi-center randomized controlled pragmatic feasibility trial

Author

Listed:
  • Hendrik Napierala
  • Niklas Jeske
  • Stephanie Roll
  • Juliane Köberlein-Neu
  • Wolfram J Herrmann

Abstract

Background: Non-medical health related social problems are highly prevalent in primary care. Even though there is a wide range of non-clinical support and services available in German communities, which can potentially meet the needs of the affected patients, there are no formalized connections between these services and primary care. One potential solution is social prescribing (SP) providing general practitioners (GPs) with a non-medical referral option, which can accompany existing treatments to improve health and well-being. The goal of this trial is to test the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial and potential benefit of SP in the primary care setting in Germany. Methods: This trial is designed as a multi-center, two-armed, open, exploratory, individually randomized (2:1) controlled, pragmatic, feasibility trial. 300 adult patients presenting with one or more non-medical health-related social needs will be recruited in GP practices in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany. Participants in the intervention group will receive a referral to a link worker. The link worker assesses the social needs, agrees on a goal and sets up an action plan together with the patient. The link worker then connects the patient to suitable non-clinical support and services in the community (e.g., volunteering opportunities). The GP is informed about the actions taken through a feedback form. Participants in the control group will receive treatment-as-usual plus a brochure with information about local offers of non-clinical support and services in the community. Follow-up per patient is 6 months with measurements at 3 and 6 months. Primary endpoint is the feasibility of the trial measured by (1) proportion of participants who have at least one appointment with the link worker (intervention arm only), (2) proportion of participants that drop out of the trial before the 6-month follow-up (both arms). Secondary endpoints include further feasibility endpoints (acceptability, practicality, demand), clinical endpoints such the health status and wellbeing, and a goal-based outcome for the intervention group. The trial is accompanied by a process evaluation, including qualitative episodic interviews with patients and stakeholders. Furthermore, a description of selected economic consequences of SP and its intervention costs will be conducted. Discussion: This trial will assess the feasibility of implementing SP in the German primary care setting and will provide information and data necessary to plan a confirmatory trial. Implementing SP could be an adequate solution to address psychosocial problems in primary care. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Registry, DRKS-ID: DRKS00034654. Registered on August 27th.2024. https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00034654

Suggested Citation

  • Hendrik Napierala & Niklas Jeske & Stephanie Roll & Juliane Köberlein-Neu & Wolfram J Herrmann, 2025. "Social prescribing to improve health and well-being of patients presenting with non-medical health related social needs in primary care: Study protocol of a multi-center randomized controlled pragmati," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322372
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322372
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322372&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0322372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.