IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0318780.html

Financial cost of assisted reproductive technology for patients in high-income countries: A systematic review protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Purity Njagi
  • Wim Groot
  • Jelena Arsenijevic
  • Gitau Mburu
  • Georgina Chambers
  • Carlos Calhaz-Jorge
  • James Kiarie

Abstract

Background: Infertility affects one in six people globally, with similar prevalence rates across high-income and low- and middle-income countries. Technological advancements, particularly in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), have improved fertility treatment options. Although access to ART is presumed to be better in high-income countries (HICs), economic factors and eligibility restrictions could still impact effective utilization in these settings. Informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocols (PRISMA-P), this protocol outlines the methodological and analytical approaches to examine the ART costs paid by patients in HICs and the correlation with economic indicators and ART regulatory frameworks. Methods: Following the PRISMA approach, we will search for articles indexed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Latin American & Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS). Grey literature from relevant organizations’ virtual databases will also be searched. The review will encompass studies published between 2001 and 2024, with the primary outcome being ART direct medical and direct non-medical costs, while secondary outcomes shall include ART financing arrangements. The review will synthesize ART costs, adjusting them to USD Purchasing Power Parity for cross-country comparison, and correlate findings with GNI per capita and ART financing policies. The Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs (ICROMS) tool will be utilized to evaluate the quality of the included studies. We will conduct a meta-analysis if the studies provide sufficient cost-effect size estimates. Discussion: The review findings will contribute to our understanding of the potential financial burden faced by (disadvantaged) individuals in HICs due to ART costs. Additionally, the review shall highlight the implications that ART financing policies have in enhancing access and affordability, offering valuable insights for healthcare planning and policy formulation. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal article and relevant international conferences. Trial registration: Systematic review registration: PROSPERO number: CRD42023487655.

Suggested Citation

  • Purity Njagi & Wim Groot & Jelena Arsenijevic & Gitau Mburu & Georgina Chambers & Carlos Calhaz-Jorge & James Kiarie, 2025. "Financial cost of assisted reproductive technology for patients in high-income countries: A systematic review protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318780
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318780
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0318780&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0318780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    2. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Santos Urbina & Sofía Villatoro & Jesús Salinas, 2021. "Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Nadine Desrochers & Adèle Paul‐Hus & Jen Pecoskie, 2017. "Five decades of gratitude: A meta‐synthesis of acknowledgments research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2821-2833, December.
    5. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    6. Alene Sze Jing Yong & Yi Heng Lim & Mark Wing Loong Cheong & Ednin Hamzah & Siew Li Teoh, 2022. "Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(6), pages 1037-1057, August.
    7. Sarah H. Son-Theroux & Olivera J. Bogunovic, 2025. "Meeting Carer Health Information Needs in Mental Health: An Integrative Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 34(5), pages 244-254, June.
    8. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    9. García-Poole, Chloe & Byrne, Sonia & Rodrigo, María José, 2019. "How do communities intervene with adolescents at psychosocial risk? A systematic review of positive development programs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 194-209.
    10. Qing Ye & Bao-Xin Qian & Wei-Li Yin & Feng-Mei Wang & Tao Han, 2016. "Association between the HFE C282Y, H63D Polymorphisms and the Risks of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 5,758 Cases and 14,741 Controls," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Bishal Mohindru & David Turner & Tracey Sach & Diana Bilton & Siobhan Carr & Olga Archangelidi & Arjun Bhadhuri & Jennifer A. Whitty, 2020. "Health State Utility Data in Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 13-25, March.
    12. Neal R. Haddaway & Matthew J. Page & Chris C. Pritchard & Luke A. McGuinness, 2022. "PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    13. Ding Zhu & Mindan Wu & Yuan Cao & Shihua Lin & Nanxia Xuan & Chen Zhu & Wen Li & Huahao Shen, 2018. "Heated humidification did not improve compliance of positive airway pressure and subjective daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Pelai, Ricardo & Hagerman, Shannon M. & Kozak, Robert, 2020. "Biotechnologies in agriculture and forestry: Governance insights from a comparative systematic review of barriers and recommendations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    15. Cocco, Edoardo & Hashimoto, Yuji Z. & Chopin, Julien, 2025. "Child sexual abuse in the catholic church: A scoping review of characteristics, prevalence, and explanatory factors," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    16. Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Altaf & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Amir Mosavi, 2021. "Systematic Review of Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement and a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-38, April.
    17. Joesri Mohamad Saber & Kardina Kamaruddin, 2025. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Training, Competencies, and Job Readiness in the Hotel and Tourism Industry: Trends and Future Directions," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(14), pages 282-297, February.
    18. Mekuriaw Nibret Aweke & Elsa Awoke Fentie & Muluken Chanie Agimas & Lemlem Daniel Baffa & Ever Siyoum Shewarega & Aysheshim Kassahun Belew & Esmael Ali Muhammad & Berhanu Mengistu, 2025. "Folic acid supplementation during preconception period in sub-Saharan African countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-24, January.
    19. Claudia Peters & Agnessa Kozak & Albert Nienhaus & Anja Schablon, 2020. "Risk of Occupational Latent Tuberculosis Infection among Health Personnel Measured by Interferon-Gamma Release Assays in Low Incidence Countries—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Sehee Kim & Mihyeon Park & Sukhee Ahn, 2022. "The Impact of Antepartum Depression and Postpartum Depression on Exclusive Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(5), pages 866-880, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0318780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.