IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316538.html

Does management support drive sustained agile usage? a serial mediation model and cIPMA perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Uthpala Wijesinghe
  • Vidara Mapitiyage
  • Chathurya Wickramarathne
  • Chamoda Wickramage
  • Krishantha Wisenthige
  • Chathuni Aluthwala

Abstract

Agile software development is immensely popular in the industry, but most teams struggle to sustain its use. Human factors like management support, agile training, agile mindset, and team resilience are often neglected, hindering long-term success. However, research has not explored their underlying mechanisms in depth. Therefore, this study examines if management support impacts the sustained usage of agile methodologies within software development teams. It subsequently investigates the individual and serial mediating effects of agile training, the agile mindset, and team resilience on this relationship. Additionally, it compares the importance and performance of management support, agile training, the agile mindset, and team resilience in infusing agile practices. Finally, it determines these antecedents’ necessity for the enduring success of agile application. Data collected from 391 agile software development professionals using a structured questionnaire. Partial-least-squares structural equation modelling, importance-performance map analysis and necessary condition analysis were used to investigate relationships. The findings underscore the pivotal role of management support in infusing agile practices. Agile training, mindset, and team resilience emerge as critical mediators, with a strong serial mediation effect. While management support is paramount, its practical implementation falls short within teams. All four antecedents are found to be necessary for optimal agile sustainment. Thus, this study significantly advances theoretical understanding by introducing a serial mediation model that elucidates their mechanisms in impacting agile infusion. It extends prior organisational-level findings to the team-level. The study’s quantitative verification of qualitative findings strengthens their generalisability to a broader spectrum of teams. It pioneers in expounding the constructs’ relative importance, performance and necessity, to offer actionable insights for agile practitioners. Finally, it provides methodological guidance to apply importance performance map analysis and necessary condition analysis in agile software development research.

Suggested Citation

  • Uthpala Wijesinghe & Vidara Mapitiyage & Chathurya Wickramarathne & Chamoda Wickramage & Krishantha Wisenthige & Chathuni Aluthwala, 2025. "Does management support drive sustained agile usage? a serial mediation model and cIPMA perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-40, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316538
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316538
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316538&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:tsa:wpaper:00104mgt is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Hauff, Sven & Richter, Nicole Franziska & Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M., 2024. "Importance and performance in PLS-SEM and NCA: Introducing the combined importance-performance map analysis (cIPMA)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Shikha Sharma & Sanjeev K. Sharma, 2020. "Probing the Links Between Team Resilience, Competitive Advantage, and Organizational Effectiveness: Evidence from Information Technology Industry," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(2), pages 289-307, July.
    4. K. Jöreskog, 1971. "Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 36(4), pages 409-426, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsonaka, R. & Moustaki, I., 2007. "Parameter constraints in generalized linear latent variable models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4164-4177, May.
    2. Jorgensen, Bradley S. & Wilson, Mathew A. & Heberlein, Thomas A., 2001. "Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 133-148, January.
    3. Mary Corcoran, 1980. "Sex Differences in Measurement Error in Status Attainment Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 199-217, November.
    4. José Plaza-Úbeda & Jerónimo Burgos-Jiménez & Eva Carmona-Moreno, 2010. "Measuring Stakeholder Integration: Knowledge, Interaction and Adaptational Behavior Dimensions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 419-442, May.
    5. Jane, Joan & Lago, Alejandro & Ariño, Africa, 2005. "Measuring the performance of international logistics outsourcing partnerships: A dyadic perspective analysis," IESE Research Papers D/608, IESE Business School.
    6. John Tisak & William Meredith, 1989. "Exploratory longitudinal factor analysis in multiple populations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(2), pages 261-281, June.
    7. Hoshino, Takahiro, 2008. "A Bayesian propensity score adjustment for latent variable modeling and MCMC algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1413-1429, January.
    8. Adam Carle, 2010. "Interpreting the results of studies using latent variable models to assess data quality: an empirical example using confirmatory factor analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 483-497, April.
    9. Jéssica dos Santos Leite Gonella & Moacir Godinho Filho & Gilberto Miller Devós Ganga & Fabiane Leticia Lizarelli, 2024. "From awareness to action: Understanding the relationship between circular economy and favourable evaluation towards sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8679-8694, December.
    10. Yiu-Fai Yung, 1997. "Finite mixtures in confirmatory factor-analysis models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 297-330, September.
    11. Abbasi, Amir Zaib & Qummar, Hamza & Bashir, Shahid & Aziz, Shahab & Ting, Ding Hooi, 2024. "Customer engagement in Saudi food delivery apps through social media marketing: Examining the antecedents and consequences using PLS-SEM and NCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Ryan Atkins & Yuliya Yurova & Arvind Gudi & Cynthia Ruppel, 2022. "Ambidextrous Learning in Buyer-Supplier Relationships: The Role of Strategic and Operational Information Sharing," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Takahiro Hoshino & Hiroshi Kurata & Kazuo Shigemasu, 2006. "A Propensity Score Adjustment for Multiple Group Structural Equation Modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 71(4), pages 691-712, December.
    14. P. Bentler, 1986. "Structural modeling and psychometrika: An historical perspective on growth and achievements," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 35-51, March.
    15. Tahir Ahmad & Amy Van Looy, 2021. "Development and testing of an explorative BPM acceptance model: Insights from the COVID-19 pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, November.
    16. Karoui, Sedki & Behi, Azza Temessek & Fehri, Dorsaf & Belaid, Samy & Lacoeuilhe, Jérôme, 2024. "Predicting label brand loyalty: A comparison of two models using a partial least square-structural equation modeling," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Junxian Shen & Hongfeng Zhang & Cora Un In Wong & Jianhui Chen & Lianping Ren, 2025. "Relationship between childhood socio-economic status and wellness tourism intention: a combined PLS-SEM and NCA methods," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Lee, Crystal T. & Shen, Yung-Cheng, 2024. "Exploring determinants of non-fungible token creators’ engagement behaviors on metaverse-based NFT platforms: A multi-analytical SEM-IPMA method," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    19. Ibrahim A. Elshaer, 2022. "Dimensionality Analysis of Entrepreneurial Resilience amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Models with Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Bui Quang Hung & Trinh Thuy Anh & Nguyen Thi Thu Thao & Nguyen Pham Kien Minh, 2020. "The effects of firm’s innovation on customer’s loyalty: A case study of Saigon COOP," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 10(1), pages 82-100.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.