IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316538.html

Does management support drive sustained agile usage? a serial mediation model and cIPMA perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Uthpala Wijesinghe
  • Vidara Mapitiyage
  • Chathurya Wickramarathne
  • Chamoda Wickramage
  • Krishantha Wisenthige
  • Chathuni Aluthwala

Abstract

Agile software development is immensely popular in the industry, but most teams struggle to sustain its use. Human factors like management support, agile training, agile mindset, and team resilience are often neglected, hindering long-term success. However, research has not explored their underlying mechanisms in depth. Therefore, this study examines if management support impacts the sustained usage of agile methodologies within software development teams. It subsequently investigates the individual and serial mediating effects of agile training, the agile mindset, and team resilience on this relationship. Additionally, it compares the importance and performance of management support, agile training, the agile mindset, and team resilience in infusing agile practices. Finally, it determines these antecedents’ necessity for the enduring success of agile application. Data collected from 391 agile software development professionals using a structured questionnaire. Partial-least-squares structural equation modelling, importance-performance map analysis and necessary condition analysis were used to investigate relationships. The findings underscore the pivotal role of management support in infusing agile practices. Agile training, mindset, and team resilience emerge as critical mediators, with a strong serial mediation effect. While management support is paramount, its practical implementation falls short within teams. All four antecedents are found to be necessary for optimal agile sustainment. Thus, this study significantly advances theoretical understanding by introducing a serial mediation model that elucidates their mechanisms in impacting agile infusion. It extends prior organisational-level findings to the team-level. The study’s quantitative verification of qualitative findings strengthens their generalisability to a broader spectrum of teams. It pioneers in expounding the constructs’ relative importance, performance and necessity, to offer actionable insights for agile practitioners. Finally, it provides methodological guidance to apply importance performance map analysis and necessary condition analysis in agile software development research.

Suggested Citation

  • Uthpala Wijesinghe & Vidara Mapitiyage & Chathurya Wickramarathne & Chamoda Wickramage & Krishantha Wisenthige & Chathuni Aluthwala, 2025. "Does management support drive sustained agile usage? a serial mediation model and cIPMA perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-40, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316538
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316538
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316538&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:tsa:wpaper:00104mgt is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Hauff, Sven & Richter, Nicole Franziska & Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M., 2024. "Importance and performance in PLS-SEM and NCA: Introducing the combined importance-performance map analysis (cIPMA)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Shikha Sharma & Sanjeev K. Sharma, 2020. "Probing the Links Between Team Resilience, Competitive Advantage, and Organizational Effectiveness: Evidence from Information Technology Industry," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(2), pages 289-307, July.
    4. Jan Dul & Sven Hauff & Ricarda B. Bouncken, 2023. "Correction: Necessary condition analysis (NCA): review of research topics and guidelines for good practice," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1535-1537, May.
    5. K. Jöreskog, 1971. "Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 36(4), pages 409-426, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahman, Syed Mahmudur & Carlson, Jamie & Chowdhury, Noman H. & Gudergan, Siegfried P. & Wetzels, Martin & Ringle, Christian M. & Grewal, Dhruv, 2026. "Omnichannel safe customer experience: how should it be measured? Does it affect customer well-being and retailers’ performance?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Abbasi, Amir Zaib & Qummar, Hamza & Bashir, Shahid & Aziz, Shahab & Ting, Ding Hooi, 2024. "Customer engagement in Saudi food delivery apps through social media marketing: Examining the antecedents and consequences using PLS-SEM and NCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Dul, Jan, 2024. "A different causal perspective with Necessary Condition Analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    4. Magno, Francesca & Cassia, Fabio, 2024. "Predicting restaurants’ surplus food platform continuance: Insights from the combined use of PLS-SEM and NCA and predictive model comparisons," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Yi-Man Teng & Kun-Shan Wu & Zhezhou Li, 2026. "The socio-technical engine driving hotel live streaming engagement: insights from PLS-SEM, NCA, and cIPMA," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Cai Li & Agyemang Kwasi Sampene & Adnan Khan & John Wiredu, 2025. "Environmental orientations to Innovation Ecosystem: the role of green transition, perceived environmental uncertainty and green transformational leadership," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 48-71, March.
    7. Randy Riggs & Carmen M. Felipe & José L. Roldán & Juan C. Real, 2025. "Deepening big data sustainable value creation: insights using IPMA, NCA, and cIPMA," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(4), pages 1000-1019, December.
    8. Troiville, Julien & Moisescu, Ovidiu I. & Radomir, Lăcrămioara, 2025. "Using necessary condition analysis to complement multigroup analysis in partial least squares structural equation modeling," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. neetu singh, 2026. "Direct and predictive effects of PAKSERV dimensions and Schwartz cultural values on Gen Z satisfaction and loyalty in fashion retail," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Nathenael Fentaw Ayele & Manjit Singh, 2026. "Toward Sustainable Performance of Commercial Banks: A Necessary Conditions Analysis in Ethiopian Context," SAGE Open, , vol. 16(2), pages 21582440261, May.
    11. Md. Rashed & Md. Kamal Uddin & Mohammad Fakhrul Islam & Md. Faisal-E-Alam & Hasanuzzaman Tushar & Md Emon Ahmed, 2025. "Building Resilient Organizations: The Role of Technological Capability, Innovation Leadership, and Sustainability," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(4), pages 963-995, December.
    12. Tsonaka, R. & Moustaki, I., 2007. "Parameter constraints in generalized linear latent variable models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4164-4177, May.
    13. Jorgensen, Bradley S. & Wilson, Mathew A. & Heberlein, Thomas A., 2001. "Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 133-148, January.
    14. Mary Corcoran, 1980. "Sex Differences in Measurement Error in Status Attainment Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 199-217, November.
    15. José Plaza-Úbeda & Jerónimo Burgos-Jiménez & Eva Carmona-Moreno, 2010. "Measuring Stakeholder Integration: Knowledge, Interaction and Adaptational Behavior Dimensions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 419-442, May.
    16. Mohammad Fakhrul Islam & Mohammad Imran Hossain & Md. Rashed & Md. Naeemur Rahman & Mohammad Imtiaz Hossain & Md. Faisal-E-Alam, 2025. "Strategizing for Sustainability: Examining the Dynamic Interplay of the Circular Economy, Green Technology Innovation, and Green Performance," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(4), pages 935-961, December.
    17. Jane, Joan & Lago, Alejandro & Ariño, Africa, 2005. "Measuring the performance of international logistics outsourcing partnerships: A dyadic perspective analysis," IESE Research Papers D/608, IESE Business School.
    18. Joana Morgado Oliveira & Carlos F. Gomes, 2025. "Critical factors for the success of Sustainable Development Goal 12 in the digital transformation era: The effect of ISO 14001," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 788-803, January.
    19. John Tisak & William Meredith, 1989. "Exploratory longitudinal factor analysis in multiple populations," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(2), pages 261-281, June.
    20. Cayetano Medina-Molina & Noemí Pérez-Macías & Sierra Rey-Tienda, 2024. "Strategies for urban cycling: an analysis through generalized analytic induction," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 21(4), pages 963-997, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.