IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability and validity of the original and brief German version of the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS): Longitudinal study findings

Author

Listed:
  • Franziska Lehnig
  • Katja Linde
  • Viktoria Schmidt
  • Michaela Nagl
  • Julia Martini
  • Holger Stepan
  • Anette Kersting

Abstract

Background: Maternal-foetal attachment (MFA) seems essential for adapting to motherhood and the healthy development of the child, with direct implications for clinical practice. It is often assessed using the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS), which covers two dimensions: quality and intensity of attachment. However, studies including the MAAS presented missing or inadequate psychometric properties. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of both the original and the recently introduced brief German version of the MAAS. Materials and methods: Data from 184 pregnant women from a longitudinal study were used. Women (≥ 18 years old) were recruited between the 18th and 22nd weeks of gestation while waiting for routine prenatal diagnostic appointments. Participants answered the MAAS, together with other questionnaires measuring maternal mental health, self-esteem, and social support. For both versions of the MAAS (19 items vs. 13 items), item characteristics, confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were calculated and compared. Moreover, associations between the brief German MAAS and theoretically related constructs were analysed using correlation coefficients. Results: In this study, item analyses revealed better psychometric properties for the brief German MAAS than for the original MAAS, with a significant reduction in items with inadequate discriminatory power. The internal consistency (α ≥ .69) and test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ .62) were acceptable to good for both MAAS versions. With regard to structural validity, factor analysis of the German MAAS presented acceptable to good global model fit indices for the model with correlated factors (GFI > .90; RMSEA ≤ .08; SRMR

Suggested Citation

  • Franziska Lehnig & Katja Linde & Viktoria Schmidt & Michaela Nagl & Julia Martini & Holger Stepan & Anette Kersting, 2024. "Reliability and validity of the original and brief German version of the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS): Longitudinal study findings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316374
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316374
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316374&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316374?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aickin, M. & Gensler, H., 1996. "Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: The Bonferroni vs Holm methods," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(5), pages 726-728.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyojung Tak & Gregory Ruhnke & Ya-Chen Shih, 2015. "The Association between Patient-Centered Attributes of Care and Patient Satisfaction," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 8(2), pages 187-197, April.
    2. Colette Cunningham-Myrie & Katherine P Theall & Novie Younger-Coleman & Lisa-Gaye Greene & Parris Lyew-Ayee & Rainford Wilks, 2021. "Associations of neighborhood physical and crime environments with obesity-related outcomes in Jamaica," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Eleonora Cataldo & Maddalena Fucile & Giovan Battista Mattii, 2022. "Effects of Kaolin and Shading Net on the Ecophysiology and Berry Composition of Sauvignon Blanc Grapevines," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, March.
    4. repec:osf:osfxxx:uczaw_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Van de Velde, Liesbeth & Verbeke, Wim & Popp, Michael & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2010. "The importance of message framing for providing information about sustainability and environmental aspects of energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5541-5549, October.
    6. Mahamed G. H. Omran & Maurice Clerc & Fatme Ghaddar & Ahmad Aldabagh & Omar Tawfik, 2022. "Permutation Tests for Metaheuristic Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Natalia Nehrebecka, 2017. "Probability-of-default curve calibration and validation of internal rating systems," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Statistical implications of the new financial landscape, volume 43, Bank for International Settlements.
    8. José‐Luis Pinto‐Prades & José‐María Abellán‐Perpiñán, 2005. "Measuring the health of populations: the veil of ignorance approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(1), pages 69-82, January.
    9. Ruhm, Christopher J., 2003. "Good times make you sick," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 637-658, July.
    10. Paolo Finotelli & Ottavia Dipasquale & Isa Costantini & Alessia Pini & Francesca Baglio & Giuseppe Baselli & Paolo Dulio & Mara Cercignani, 2018. "Exploring resting-state functional connectivity invariants across the lifespan in healthy people by means of a recently proposed graph theoretical model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, November.
    11. Yuetong Chen & Hao Wang & Baolong Zhang & Wei Zhang, 2022. "A method of measuring the article discriminative capacity and its distribution," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3317-3341, June.
    12. Rozgonjuk, Dmitri & Schmitz, Florian & Kannen, Christopher & Montag, Christian, 2021. "Cognitive ability and personality: Testing broad to nuanced associations with a smartphone app," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    13. Hein, Ilka & Cecil, Julia & Lermer, Eva, 2024. "Acceptance and motivational effect of AI-driven feedback in the workplace: An experimental study with direct replication," OSF Preprints uczaw, Center for Open Science.
    14. Carl Berning & Bernd Weiß, 2016. "Publication bias in the German social sciences: an application of the caliper test to three top-tier German social science journals," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 901-917, March.
    15. Lennart Reifels & Amy Morgan & Lay San Too & Marisa Schlichthorst & Michelle Williamson & Helen Jordan, 2021. "What Works in Community-Led Suicide Prevention: Perspectives of Wesley LifeForce Network Coordinators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Ju-Yu Yen & Yi-Chun Yeh & Peng-Wei Wang & Tai-Ling Liu & Yun-Yu Chen & Chih-Hung Ko, 2017. "Emotional Regulation in Young Adults with Internet Gaming Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Chun-Hao Li & Ming-Chang Tsai, 2014. "Is the Easy Life Always the Happiest? Examining the Association of Convenience and Well-Being in Taiwan," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 673-688, July.
    18. Zoilo Emilio García-Batista & Kiero Guerra-Peña & Antonio Cano-Vindel & Solmary Xiomara Herrera-Martínez & Leonardo Adrián Medrano, 2018. "Validity and reliability of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) in general and hospital population of Dominican Republic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, June.
    19. Tulowiecki, Stephen J., 2014. "Using vegetation data within presettlement land survey records for species distribution modeling: A tale of two datasets," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 291(C), pages 109-120.
    20. Shannon M Lynch & Nandita Mitra & Michelle Ross & Craig Newcomb & Karl Dailey & Tara Jackson & Charnita M Zeigler-Johnson & Harold Riethman & Charles C Branas & Timothy R Rebbeck, 2017. "A Neighborhood-Wide Association Study (NWAS): Example of prostate cancer aggressiveness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, March.
    21. A. L. Morrison & S. Rozak & A. U. Gold & J. E. Kay, 2020. "Quantifying student engagement in learning about climate change using galvanic hand sensors in a controlled educational setting," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 17-36, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.