IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316287.html

An optimized machine learning framework for predicting and interpreting corporate ESG greenwashing behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Fanlong Zeng
  • Jintao Wang
  • Chaoyan Zeng

Abstract

The accurate prediction and interpretation of corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) greenwashing behavior is crucial for enhancing information transparency and improving regulatory effectiveness. This paper addresses the limitations in hyperparameter optimization and interpretability of existing prediction models by introducing an optimized machine learning framework. The framework integrates an Improved Hunter-Prey Optimization (IHPO) algorithm, an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) theory to predict and interpret corporate ESG greenwashing behavior. Initially, a comprehensive ESG greenwashing prediction dataset was developed through an extensive literature review and expert interviews. The IHPO algorithm was then employed to optimize the hyperparameters of the XGBoost model, forming an IHPO-XGBoost ensemble learning model for predicting corporate ESG greenwashing behavior. Finally, SHAP was used to interpret the model’s prediction outcomes. The results demonstrate that the IHPO-XGBoost model achieves outstanding performance in predicting corporate ESG greenwashing, with R², RMSE, MAE, and adjusted R² values of 0.9790, 0.1376, 0.1000, and 0.9785, respectively. Compared to traditional HPO-XGBoost models and XGBoost models combined with other optimization algorithms, the IHPO-XGBoost model exhibits superior overall performance. The interpretability analysis using SHAP theory highlights the key features influencing the prediction outcomes, revealing the specific contributions of feature interactions and the impacts of individual sample features. The findings provide valuable insights for regulators and investors to more effectively identify and assess potential corporate ESG greenwashing behavior, thereby enhancing regulatory efficiency and investment decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Fanlong Zeng & Jintao Wang & Chaoyan Zeng, 2025. "An optimized machine learning framework for predicting and interpreting corporate ESG greenwashing behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316287
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316287
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316287&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerdien de Vries & Bart W. Terwel & Naomi Ellemers & Dancker D. L. Daamen, 2015. "Sustainability or Profitability? How Communicated Motives for Environmental Policy Affect Public Perceptions of Corporate Greenwashing," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 142-154, May.
    2. Jia Liao & Yun Zhan & Xiaoyang Zhao, 2023. "Two tigers cannot live on the same mountain: The impact of the second largest shareholder on controlling shareholder’s tunneling behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Ke Peng & Yan Peng & Wenguang Li, 2023. "Research on customer churn prediction and model interpretability analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-26, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Devy Mawarnie Puspitasari & Jacky Chin & Sunita Dasman, 2025. "Determinants and Prediction Model for Rural Bank Sustainability in Indonesia Post-COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Isabelly Alves Alvares dos Santos & Ana Cláudia de Araújo Moxotó & Edjard de Souza Mota, 2025. "Greenwashing in Brazilian Corporations: A Machine Learning Approach to Unmask the Discourse‐Practice Gap," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 8214-8224, November.
    3. Cordeiro, Cheryl Marie & Adomaitis, Laurynas & Huang, Lei, 2026. "The AI-policy-governance nexus: How regulation and AI shift corporate governance toward stakeholders," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Ille, Sebastian & Carrera, Edgar J. Sanchez, 2025. "Why Do Firms Choose to Greenwash: An Evolutionary Analysis of Greenwashing Incentives and Deterrents," MPRA Paper 126152, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Cerchione & Renato Passaro & Viviana Sicardi, 2025. "Do no Significant Harm (DNSH) Principle in Corporate Sustainability Strategies: Towards a Methodological Framework," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 7528-7552, November.
    2. Francesca Bernini & Fabio La Rosa, 2024. "Research in the greenwashing field: concepts, theories, and potential impacts on economic and social value," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 405-444, June.
    3. Siri Boe‐Lillegraven & Joris Demmers, 2025. "Leveling up on labels? Consumer preferences for firm‐level eco‐labels as substitutes for or complements to product‐level eco‐labels," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 1920-1944, March.
    4. Arslan, Ahmad & Haapanen, Lauri & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, Pia & Tarba, Shlomo Y. & Alon, Ilan, 2021. "Climate change, consumer lifestyles and legitimation strategies of sustainability-oriented firms," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 720-730.
    5. Lars Moratis & Max van Egmond, 2018. "Concealing social responsibility? Investigating the relationship between CSR, earnings management and the effect of industry through quantitative analysis," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Li, Kevin X. & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Shipping industry's sustainability communications to public in social media: A longitudinal analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 123-134.
    7. Anat Toder‐Alon & Eyal Rosenstreich & Tali Te'eni Harari, 2019. "Give or take? Consumers' ambivalent perspectives on the relationship between a firm's corporate social responsibility engagement and its responsible tax payments," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 872-884, July.
    8. Thomas Koch & Nora Denner, 2025. "What is greenwashing – a scoping review of greenwashing definitions and development of the Need-for-Balance Model," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Cao, June & Huang, Zijie & Shahid, Ahmad Usman, 2025. "Fostering environmental integrity via investor-focused communications: Private in-house meeting disclosures and greenwashing behaviors," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    10. Kesen Zhang & Bilal Ahmed & Ruping Wang & Baoying Gu, 2025. "The Influence of Internal Governance and External Legitimacy on Greenwashing: A Digitalization Perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4881-4909, February.
    11. Ye Chen & Naiding Yang, 2026. "Investor’s Explicit and Implicit Attributions for CSR Motives: Neuroscientific Insights," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 205(1), pages 109-137, April.
    12. Anis Ur Rehman & Sushant Kumar & Rsha Alghafes & Laura Broccardo & Ajay Kumar Patel, 2025. "Role of Greenwashing in Influencing Brand Attitude and Consumption: Identifying Sustainable Business Strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 6686-6703, September.
    13. Zhaokun Guo & Weiyan Jiang & Kunhui Ye, 2025. "Interplay of ESG, Trust, and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence From China’s Listed Companies," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    14. Santhiya Ramasamy & Karpal S. Dara Singh & Azlan Amran & Mehran Nejati, 2020. "Linking human values to consumer CSR perception: The moderating role of consumer skepticism," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1958-1971, July.
    15. Ivo Hristov & Andrea Appolloni, 2022. "Stakeholders' engagement in the business strategy as a key driver to increase companies' performance: Evidence from managerial and stakeholders' practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1488-1503, May.
    16. Francesca Bernini & Marco Giuliani & Fabio La Rosa, 2024. "Measuring greenwashing: A systematic methodological literature review," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 649-667, October.
    17. Mitra Salimi & Francesco Tuscolano & Outi Niininen & Outi Uusitalo, 2026. "The Role of Social Media in Exposing Greenwashing: Consumer Sentiments and Discussions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 2360-2383, March.
    18. Tatiana Chopova & Naomi Ellemers & Elena Sinelnikova, 2024. "Morality matters: social psychological perspectives on how and why CSR activities and communications affect stakeholders’ support - experimental design evidence for the mediating role of perceived organizational morality comparing WEIRD (UK) and non-," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Jonathan Luffarelli & Amrou Awaysheh, 2018. "The Impact of Indirect Corporate Social Performance Signals on Firm Value: Evidence from an Event Study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 295-310, May.
    20. Antonio Prencipe & Danilo Boffa & Christian Corsi, 2025. "Sustainability‐Oriented Businesses and Earnings Management. What Is the True Relationship? Evidence From Italian Benefit Corporations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 4671-4689, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.