IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0316287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An optimized machine learning framework for predicting and interpreting corporate ESG greenwashing behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Fanlong Zeng
  • Jintao Wang
  • Chaoyan Zeng

Abstract

The accurate prediction and interpretation of corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) greenwashing behavior is crucial for enhancing information transparency and improving regulatory effectiveness. This paper addresses the limitations in hyperparameter optimization and interpretability of existing prediction models by introducing an optimized machine learning framework. The framework integrates an Improved Hunter-Prey Optimization (IHPO) algorithm, an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) theory to predict and interpret corporate ESG greenwashing behavior. Initially, a comprehensive ESG greenwashing prediction dataset was developed through an extensive literature review and expert interviews. The IHPO algorithm was then employed to optimize the hyperparameters of the XGBoost model, forming an IHPO-XGBoost ensemble learning model for predicting corporate ESG greenwashing behavior. Finally, SHAP was used to interpret the model’s prediction outcomes. The results demonstrate that the IHPO-XGBoost model achieves outstanding performance in predicting corporate ESG greenwashing, with R², RMSE, MAE, and adjusted R² values of 0.9790, 0.1376, 0.1000, and 0.9785, respectively. Compared to traditional HPO-XGBoost models and XGBoost models combined with other optimization algorithms, the IHPO-XGBoost model exhibits superior overall performance. The interpretability analysis using SHAP theory highlights the key features influencing the prediction outcomes, revealing the specific contributions of feature interactions and the impacts of individual sample features. The findings provide valuable insights for regulators and investors to more effectively identify and assess potential corporate ESG greenwashing behavior, thereby enhancing regulatory efficiency and investment decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Fanlong Zeng & Jintao Wang & Chaoyan Zeng, 2025. "An optimized machine learning framework for predicting and interpreting corporate ESG greenwashing behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316287
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316287
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316287&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0316287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ke Peng & Yan Peng & Wenguang Li, 2023. "Research on customer churn prediction and model interpretability analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Gerdien de Vries & Bart W. Terwel & Naomi Ellemers & Dancker D. L. Daamen, 2015. "Sustainability or Profitability? How Communicated Motives for Environmental Policy Affect Public Perceptions of Corporate Greenwashing," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 142-154, May.
    3. Jia Liao & Yun Zhan & Xiaoyang Zhao, 2023. "Two tigers cannot live on the same mountain: The impact of the second largest shareholder on controlling shareholder’s tunneling behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, June & Huang, Zijie & Shahid, Ahmad Usman, 2025. "Fostering environmental integrity via investor-focused communications: Private in-house meeting disclosures and greenwashing behaviors," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. Ivo Hristov & Andrea Appolloni, 2022. "Stakeholders' engagement in the business strategy as a key driver to increase companies' performance: Evidence from managerial and stakeholders' practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1488-1503, May.
    3. Jonathan Luffarelli & Amrou Awaysheh, 2018. "The Impact of Indirect Corporate Social Performance Signals on Firm Value: Evidence from an Event Study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 295-310, May.
    4. Vera Ferrón‐Vílchez & Jesus Valero‐Gil & Inés Suárez‐Perales, 2021. "How does greenwashing influence managers' decision‐making? An experimental approach under stakeholder view," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 860-880, March.
    5. Ivo Hristov & Andrea Appolloni & Antonio Chirico, 2022. "The adoption of the key performance indicators to integrate sustainability in the business strategy: A novel five‐dimensional framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3216-3230, November.
    6. Jennifer L. Robertson & A. Wren Montgomery & Timur Ozbilir, 2023. "Employees' response to corporate greenwashing," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4015-4027, November.
    7. Nguyen, Nga & Priporas, Constantinos-Vasilios & McPherson, Mark & Manyiwa, Simon, 2023. "CSR-related consumer scepticism: A review of the literature and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Liao, Feimei & Sun, Yinghao & Xu, Shulin, 2023. "Financial report comment letters and greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    9. Johan Graafland, 2018. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Put Reputation at Risk by Inviting Activist Targeting? An Empirical Test among European SMEs," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Stephanie Mansourian & Daniel Vallauri, 2023. "Unravelling the extent of tree planting by corporations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1514-1523, May.
    11. Xuhui Peng & Jingduan Li & Qingliang Tang & Yi‐Chen Lan & Xinjian Cui, 2024. "Do environmental scores become multinational corporations' strategic “greenwashing” tool for window‐dressing carbon reduction? A cross‐cultural analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2084-2115, March.
    12. Emmanuel Lawal & Gökan May & Bojan Stahl, 2017. "The Significance of Corporate Social Disclosure for High‐Tech Manufacturing Companies: Focus on Employee and Community Aspects of Sustainable Development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 295-311, July.
    13. Carlos Ignacio Gallo Aguila & María del Pilar Castro Arellano & Marco Antonio Rodríguez Vega & Eliana Maritza Barturen Mondragón & María del Pilar Quezada Castro & Guillermo Alexander Quezada Cast, 2024. "Trends in Scientific Production on Greenwashing based on Scopus (1990-2023)," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(4), pages 464-471, July.
    14. Paolo Esposito & Emanuele Doronzo & Vincenzo Riso & Massimiliano Tufo, 2025. "Sustainability in Energy Companies Under the Lens of Cultural Pressures: When Do We Talk of Greenwashing?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3814-3831, May.
    15. Szerena Szabo & Jane Webster, 2021. "Perceived Greenwashing: The Effects of Green Marketing on Environmental and Product Perceptions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(4), pages 719-739, July.
    16. Sajid Ullah & Naveed Ahmad & Farman Ullah Khan & Alina Badulescu & Daniel Badulescu, 2021. "Mapping Interactions among Green Innovations Barriers in Manufacturing Industry Using Hybrid Methodology: Insights from a Developing Country," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-25, July.
    17. Juan Andres Bernal‐Conesa & Carmen de Nieves Nieto & Antonio Juan Briones‐Peñalver, 2017. "CSR Strategy in Technology Companies: Its Influence on Performance, Competitiveness and Sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 96-107, March.
    18. Lasarov, Wassili & Mai, Robert & Krause, Jan S. & Schmidt, Ulrich & Hoffmann, Stefan, 2021. "Too Cold to be Skeptical: How Ambient Temperature Moderates the Effects of CSR Communication," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Chen, Qi & Duan, Yongrui, 2023. "Impact of information disclosure on global supply chain greenwashing: Is more information transparency always better?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    20. Civilai Leckie & Daniel Rayne & Lester W. Johnson, 2021. "Promoting Customer Engagement Behavior for Green Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0316287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.