IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0314629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paw pressure and gait in middle-aged client-owned cats with and without naturally-occurring musculoskeletal disease

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Dowgray
  • Eithne Comerford
  • Alexander J German
  • James Gardiner
  • Gina Pinchbeck
  • Karl T Bates

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disease (MSD) is common in ageing cats, resulting in chronic pain and mobility impairment, but diagnosis can be challenging. We hypothesised that there would be differences between cats with and without MSD in paw pressure and spatiotemporal and kinetic gait metrics. A cohort of 53 cats, aged between 7 and 10 years from the North West of the United Kingdom, underwent an orthopaedic examination and walked on a pressure sensitive walkway. Thirty-one of the cats (58%) were determined to be apparently-healthy, based on a normal orthopaedic examination and having no history of MSD, whilst the remaining 22 cats (42%) had findings consistent with MSD; 13/22 cats (59%) had multiple limb involvement, 7/22 (32%) had forelimb involvement and 2/22 (9%) had hindlimb involvement. Bodyweight (P = 0.048) and body condition score (BCS; P = 0.015) were both greater in cats with MSD (mean bodyweight 5.4 ± 1.35 kg; median BCS 6, IQR 6–7.75) compared with apparently-healthy cats (mean bodyweight 4.7 ± 0.94 kg; median BCS 5, IQR 4.5–6.5). There was a relatively large intra-cat variation in spatiotemporal and kinetic gait variables (coefficient of variation >3.0%), whilst a linear mixed-effects model suggested no significant difference in spatiotemporal or kinetic gait variables between apparently-healthy cats and those with MSD. Palmar and plantar pressure asymmetry was assessed by pedobarographic statistical parametric mapping (pSPM) within each individual cat, with no significant difference (P = 0.353) between the apparently heathy cats and those with MSD as to the presence or absence of asymmetry. Given the marked intra-cat variation and the ‘multi-limb’ nature of MSD in this cohort, it was not possible to differentiate healthy cats from those with MSD based on spatiotemporal and kinetic gait metrics or paw pressure asymmetry. Future work should examine gait in cats with defined musculoskeletal disorders (e.g. hip dysplasia) and also to track longitudinal changes within individual cats to better establish age-related trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Dowgray & Eithne Comerford & Alexander J German & James Gardiner & Gina Pinchbeck & Karl T Bates, 2024. "Paw pressure and gait in middle-aged client-owned cats with and without naturally-occurring musculoskeletal disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314629
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314629
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314629&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0314629?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. Le Quang & P. Maitre & A. Colin & E. Viguier, 2008. "Spatial, temporal and kinetic evaluation of normal cats at walk, using a pressure walkway," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(S1), pages 137-138.
    2. Wickham, Hadley, 2007. "Reshaping Data with the reshape Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 21(i12).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Augustinus, Benno A. & Blum, Moshe & Citterio, Sandra & Gentili, Rodolfo & Helman, David & Nestel, David & Schaffner, Urs & Müller-Schärer, Heinz & Lensky, Itamar M., 2022. "Ground-truthing predictions of a demographic model driven by land surface temperatures with a weed biocontrol cage experiment," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    2. Miller, Christine M.F. & Waterhouse, Hannah & Harter, Thomas & Fadel, James G. & Meyer, Deanne, 2020. "Quantifying the uncertainty in nitrogen application and groundwater nitrate leaching in manure based cropping systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Sean McKenzie & Hilary Parkinson & Jane Mangold & Mary Burrows & Selena Ahmed & Fabian Menalled, 2018. "Perceptions, Experiences, and Priorities Supporting Agroecosystem Management Decisions Differ among Agricultural Producers, Consultants, and Researchers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    4. C. J. Torrecilla-Salinas & O. Troyer & M. J. Escalona & M. Mejías, 2019. "A Delphi-based expert judgment method applied to the validation of a mature Agile framework for Web development projects," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 9-40, March.
    5. Priyanga Dilini Talagala & Rob J Hyndman & Kate Smith-Miles & Sevvandi Kandanaarachchi & Mario A Munoz, 2018. "Anomaly detection in streaming nonstationary temporal data," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 4/18, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    6. Thelma Dede Baddoo & Zhijia Li & Yiqing Guan & Kenneth Rodolphe Chabi Boni & Isaac Kwesi Nooni, 2020. "Data-Driven Modeling and the Influence of Objective Function Selection on Model Performance in Limited Data Regions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Luiz A. Domeignoz-Horta & Seraina L. Cappelli & Rashmi Shrestha & Stephanie Gerin & Annalea K. Lohila & Jussi Heinonsalo & Daniel B. Nelson & Ansgar Kahmen & Pengpeng Duan & David Sebag & Eric Verrecc, 2024. "Plant diversity drives positive microbial associations in the rhizosphere enhancing carbon use efficiency in agricultural soils," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Paul J McMurdie & Susan Holmes, 2014. "Waste Not, Want Not: Why Rarefying Microbiome Data Is Inadmissible," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Priscila Villalobos Perna & Mirko Di Febbraro & Maria Laura Carranza & Flavio Marzialetti & Michele Innangi, 2023. "Remote Sensing and Invasive Plants in Coastal Ecosystems: What We Know So Far and Future Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Bikram K. Das & Robiul Islam Rubel & Surbhi Gupta & Yajun Wu & Lin Wei & Volker S. Brözel, 2022. "Impacts of Biochar-Based Controlled-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers on Soil Prokaryotic and Fungal Communities," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Stefan LINGNER & Eiko THIESSEN & Kerrin MÜLLER & Eberhard HARTUNG, 2018. "Dry Biomass Estimation of Hedge Banks: Allometric Equation vs. Structure from Motion via Unmanned Aerial Vehicle," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(4), pages 149-156.
    12. França, Lucas Gabriel Souza & Montoya, Pedro & Miranda, José Garcia Vivas, 2019. "On multifractals: A non-linear study of actigraphy data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 514(C), pages 612-619.
    13. Wenjun Chen & Jordan S. Brown & Tao He & Wei-Sheng Wu & Shikui Tu & Zhiping Weng & Donglei Zhang & Heng-Chi Lee, 2022. "GLH/VASA helicases promote germ granule formation to ensure the fidelity of piRNA-mediated transcriptome surveillance," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Javier García-Algarra & Gonzalo Gómez-Bengoechea & Mary Luz Mouronte-López, 2025. "Convergence Speed and Growth Patterns: A Dynamical Systems Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 65(2), pages 615-636, February.
    15. Ashton S. Holub & Sarah G. Choudury & Ekaterina P. Andrianova & Courtney E. Dresden & Ricardo Urquidi Camacho & Igor B. Zhulin & Aman Y. Husbands, 2024. "START domains generate paralog-specific regulons from a single network architecture," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Lisa Biber‐Freudenberger & Candan Ergeneman & Jan Janosch Förster & Thomas Dietz & Jan Börner, 2020. "Bioeconomy futures: Expectation patterns of scientists and practitioners on the sustainability of bio‐based transformation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1220-1235, September.
    17. Röseler, Lukas & Bögler, Hannah L. & Koßmann, Lisa & Krueger, Sabine M. & Bickenbach, Sabrina L. C. & Bühler, Ricarda & della Guardia, Jasmin & Köppel, Lisa-Marie A. & Möhring, Jarl & Ponader, Susanne, 2024. "Need for Cognition, Cognitive Load, and Forewarning do not Moderate Anchoring Effects. A Replication Study of Epley & Gilovich (Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2005; Psychological Science, 2006," Journal of Comments and Replications in Economics (JCRE), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3, pages 1-42.
    18. Sara Söderqvist & Annika Viljamaa & Natalie Geyer & Anna-Lena Keller & Kseniya Ruksha & Carina Strell & Neda Hekmati & Alexandra Niculae & Jennie Engstrand & Ernesto Sparrelid & Caroline Salmén & Tâni, 2025. "An injury-associated lobular microniche is associated with the classical tumor cell phenotype in pancreatic cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. repec:plo:pone00:0061217 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. repec:plo:pone00:0178783 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Cornelius J. König & Clemens B. Fell & Linus Kellnhofer & Gabriel Schui, 2015. "Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1931-1952, December.
    22. repec:osf:socarx:zyc6s_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Antonio Alvarado & Emily M Mader & Danielle Buttke & Laura C Harrington, 2022. "Southwestern national park service employee risk, knowledge, and concern for triatomine exposure: A qualitative analysis using a novel knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0314629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.