IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0312130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of production capacity for open-pit coal mines under uncertainty: A model based on economies of scale

Author

Listed:
  • Shuai Wang
  • Bo Cao
  • Runcai Bai
  • Guangwei Liu

Abstract

The determination of optimal production capacity for open-pit mines is influenced by various economic and technical factors and is highly susceptible to uncertainties. To effectively address the impact of uncertainty on capacity planning, this study develops a production capacity planning model for open-pit coal mines, based on the theory of economies of scale and incorporating multiple uncertainty constraints. A novel method is proposed to quantify and propagate the uncertainties of key capacity control factors, alongside a comprehensive uncertainty analysis framework for total revenue. Using a large-scale open-pit mine as a case study, the relationships and calculation tables for the uncertainties of key control factors are provided. Based on this, a mathematical expression for total revenue under the influence of multiple uncertainties is formulated, and the optimal capacity range is calculated. The application of the model is demonstrated through this case study, revealing that the uncertainties in production costs and coal prices are (-13.05%, +27.68%) and (-10.79%, +10.79%) respectively. Subsequently, risk-tolerant capacity planning recommendations are proposed, effectively mitigating the impact of uncertainties on production capacity determination.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuai Wang & Bo Cao & Runcai Bai & Guangwei Liu, 2025. "Determination of production capacity for open-pit coal mines under uncertainty: A model based on economies of scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312130
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312130
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0312130&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0312130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandra M. Newman & Enrique Rubio & Rodrigo Caro & Andrés Weintraub & Kelly Eurek, 2010. "A Review of Operations Research in Mine Planning," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 222-245, June.
    2. Riesgo García, María Victoria & Krzemień, Alicja & Manzanedo del Campo, Miguel Ángel & Escanciano García-Miranda, Carmen & Sánchez Lasheras, Fernando, 2018. "Rare earth elements price forecasting by means of transgenic time series developed with ARIMA models," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 95-102.
    3. Buelga Díaz, Arturo & Diego Álvarez, Isidro & Castañón Fernández, César & Krzemień, Alicja & Iglesias Rodríguez, Francisco Javier, 2021. "Calculating ultimate pit limits and determining pushbacks in open-pit mining projects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. H. Christopher Frey & David E. Burmaster, 1999. "Methods for Characterizing Variability and Uncertainty: Comparison of Bootstrap Simulation and Likelihood‐Based Approaches," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 109-130, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Epstein & Marcel Goic & Andrés Weintraub & Jaime Catalán & Pablo Santibáñez & Rodolfo Urrutia & Raúl Cancino & Sergio Gaete & Augusto Aguayo & Felipe Caro, 2012. "Optimizing Long-Term Production Plans in Underground and Open-Pit Copper Mines," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 4-17, February.
    2. Amina Lamghari & Roussos Dimitrakopoulos & Jacques Ferland, 2015. "A hybrid method based on linear programming and variable neighborhood descent for scheduling production in open-pit mines," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 555-582, November.
    3. Madaleno, Mara & Taskin, Dilvin & Dogan, Eyup & Tzeremes, Panayiotis, 2023. "A dynamic connectedness analysis between rare earth prices and renewable energy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    4. McKenna, Claire & Chalabi, Zaid & Epstein, David & Claxton, Karl, 2010. "Budgetary policies and available actions: A generalisation of decision rules for allocation and research decisions," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 170-181, January.
    5. César Flores-Fonseca & Rodrigo Linfati & John Willmer Escobar, 2022. "Exact algorithms for production planning in mining considering the use of stockpiles and sequencing of power shovels in open-pit mines," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2529-2553, July.
    6. Christina N. Burt & Lou Caccetta, 2014. "Equipment Selection for Surface Mining: A Review," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 143-162, April.
    7. W. Brian Lambert & Andrea Brickey & Alexandra M. Newman & Kelly Eurek, 2014. "Open-Pit Block-Sequencing Formulations: A Tutorial," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 127-142, April.
    8. K. Sirinanda & M. Brazil & P. Grossman & J. Rubinstein & D. Thomas, 2016. "Gradient-constrained discounted Steiner trees II: optimally locating a discounted Steiner point," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 515-532, March.
    9. Renaud Chicoisne & Daniel Espinoza & Marcos Goycoolea & Eduardo Moreno & Enrique Rubio, 2012. "A New Algorithm for the Open-Pit Mine Production Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 517-528, June.
    10. Nicolas Miconnet & Marie Cornu & Annie Beaufort & Laurent Rosso & Jean‐Baptiste Denis, 2005. "Uncertainty Distribution Associated with Estimating a Proportion in Microbial Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 39-48, February.
    11. Régis Pouillot & Nicolas Miconnet & Anne‐Laure Afchain & Marie Laure Delignette‐Muller & Annie Beaufort & Laurent Rosso & Jean‐Baptiste Denis & Marie Cornu, 2007. "Quantitative Risk Assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in French Cold‐Smoked Salmon: I. Quantitative Exposure Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 683-700, June.
    12. Martin L. Smith & Stewart J. Wicks, 2014. "Medium-Term Production Scheduling of the Lumwana Mining Complex," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 176-194, April.
    13. Nancel-Penard, Pierre & Morales, Nelson & Cornillier, Fabien, 2022. "A recursive time aggregation-disaggregation heuristic for the multidimensional and multiperiod precedence-constrained knapsack problem: An application to the open-pit mine block sequencing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1088-1099.
    14. Nakousi, C. & Pascual, R. & Anani, A. & Kristjanpoller, F. & Lillo, P., 2018. "An asset-management oriented methodology for mine haul-fleet usage scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 336-344.
    15. Jélvez, Enrique & Morales, Nelson & Nancel-Penard, Pierre & Peypouquet, Juan & Reyes, Patricio, 2016. "Aggregation heuristic for the open-pit block scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1169-1177.
    16. Kwame Awuah-Offei & Sisi Que & Atta Ur Rehman, 2021. "Evaluating Mine Design Alternatives for Social Risks Using Discrete Choice Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    17. Tabesh, Mohammad & Moradi Afrapoli, Ali & Askari-Nasab, Hooman, 2023. "A two-stage simultaneous optimization of NPV and throughput in production planning of open pit mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    18. Pérez, Juan & Maldonado, Sebastián & González-Ramírez, Rosa, 2018. "Decision support for fleet allocation and contract renegotiation in contracted open-pit mine blasting operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 59-69.
    19. Gonzalo Muñoz & Daniel Espinoza & Marcos Goycoolea & Eduardo Moreno & Maurice Queyranne & Orlando Rivera Letelier, 2018. "A study of the Bienstock–Zuckerberg algorithm: applications in mining and resource constrained project scheduling," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 501-534, March.
    20. Yufeng Chen & Biao Zheng, 2019. "What Happens after the Rare Earth Crisis: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0312130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.