IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0308631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI can see you: Machiavellianism and extraversion are reflected in eye-movements

Author

Listed:
  • Elina Tsigeman
  • Viktoria Zemliak
  • Maxim Likhanov
  • Kostas A Papageorgiou
  • Yulia Kovas

Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies showed an association between personality traits and individual patterns of visual behaviour in laboratory and other settings. The current study extends previous research by measuring multiple personality traits in natural settings; and by comparing accuracy of prediction of multiple machine learning algorithms. Methods: Adolescent participants (N = 35) completed personality questionnaires (Big Five Inventory and Short Dark Triad Questionnaire) and visited an interactive museum while their eye movements were recorded with head-mounted eye tracking. To predict personality traits the eye-movement data was analysed using eight machine-learning methods: Random Forest, Adaboost, Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, k Nearest Neighbours, Decision Tree and a three-layer Perceptron. Results and discussion: Extracted eye movement features introduced to machine learning algorithms predicted personality traits with above 33% chance accuracy (34%–48%). This result is comparable to previous ecologically valid studies, but lower than in laboratory-based research. Better prediction was achieved for Machiavellianism and Extraversion compared to other traits (10 and 9 predictions above the chance level by different algorithms from different parts of the recording). Conscientiousness, Narcissism and Psychopathy were not reliably predicted from eye movements. These differences in predictability across traits might be explained by differential activation of different traits in different situations, such as new vs. familiar, exciting vs. boring, and complex vs. simple settings. In turn, different machine learning approaches seem to be better at capturing specific gaze patterns (e.g. saccades), associated with specific traits evoked by the situation. Further research is needed to gain better insights into trait-situation-algorithm interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Elina Tsigeman & Viktoria Zemliak & Maxim Likhanov & Kostas A Papageorgiou & Yulia Kovas, 2024. "AI can see you: Machiavellianism and extraversion are reflected in eye-movements," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308631
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308631
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0308631&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0308631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel N. Jones & Steven M. Mueller, 2022. "Is Machiavellianism Dead or Dormant? The Perils of Researching a Secretive Construct," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 535-549, March.
    2. Nachiappan Valliappan & Na Dai & Ethan Steinberg & Junfeng He & Kantwon Rogers & Venky Ramachandran & Pingmei Xu & Mina Shojaeizadeh & Li Guo & Kai Kohlhoff & Vidhya Navalpakkam, 2020. "Accelerating eye movement research via accurate and affordable smartphone eye tracking," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Battocletti, Vittoria & Desiato, Alfredo & Romano, Alessandro & Sotis, Chiara & Tröger, Tobias, 2025. "Climate pledges and greenwashing: Information provision does not work," LawFin Working Paper Series 57, Goethe University, Center for Advanced Studies on the Foundations of Law and Finance (LawFin).
    2. Borozan, Miloš & Loreta, Cannito & Riccardo, Palumbo, 2022. "Eye-tracking for the study of financial decision-making: A systematic review of the literature," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    3. Mehrzad B. Baktash & Uwe Jirjahn, 2023. "Are Managers More Machiavellian Than Other Employees?," Research Papers in Economics 2023-07, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    4. Fischbacher, Urs & Hausfeld, Jan & Renerte, Baiba, 2022. "Strategic incentives undermine gaze as a signal of prosocial motives," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 63-91.
    5. Jirjahn, Uwe & Mohrenweiser, Jens, 2023. "Variable Payment Schemes and Productivity: Do Individual-Based Schemes Really Have a Stronger Influence than Collective Ones?," IZA Discussion Papers 16267, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Jiazhang Wang & Tianfu Wang & Bingjie Xu & Oliver Cossairt & Florian Willomitzer, 2025. "Accurate eye tracking from dense 3D surface reconstructions using single-shot deflectometry," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Xiaozhi Yang & Ian Krajbich, 2021. "Webcam-based online eye-tracking for behavioral research," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(6), pages 1485-1505, November.
    8. Moutusy Maity & Nandita Roy & Doyeeta Majumder & Prasanta Chakravarty, 2024. "Revisiting the Received Image of Machiavelli in Business Ethics Through a Close Reading of The Prince and Discourses," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(2), pages 231-252, May.
    9. Battocletti, Vittoria & Desiato, Alfredo & Romano, Alessandro & Sotis, Chiara & Tröger, Tobias, 2025. "Climate pledges and greenwashing: Information provision does not work," SAFE Working Paper Series 447, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    10. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:6:p:1485-1505 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0308631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.