IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0305096.html

Remote working and experiential wellbeing: A latent lifestyle perspective using UK time use survey before and during COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Jerry Chen
  • Li Wan

Abstract

Mental health in the UK had deteriorated compared with pre-pandemic trends. Existing studies on heterogenous wellbeing changes associated COVID-19 tend to segment population based on isolated socio-economic and demographic indicators, notably gender, income and ethnicity, while a more holistic and contextual understanding of such heterogeneity among the workforce seems lacking. This study addresses this gap by 1) combining UK time use surveys collected before and during COVID-19, 2) identifying latent lifestyles within three working mode groups (commuter, homeworker and hybrid worker) using latent class model, and 3) quantifying nuanced experiential wellbeing (ExWB) changes across workers of distinct lifestyles. The direction and magnitude of ExWB changes were not uniform across activity types, time of day, and lifestyles. The direction of ExWB change during the daytime activities window varied in accordance with lifestyle classifications. Specifically, ExWB decreased for all homeworkers but increased significantly for certain hybrid workers. Magnitude of ExWB change correlated strongly with lifestyle. To understand the significant heterogeneity in ExWB outcomes, a spatial-temporal conceptualisation of working flexibility is developed to explicate the strong yet complex correlations between wellbeing and lifestyles. The implications to post-pandemic “back-to-work” policies are 1) continued expansion of hybrid working optionality, 2) provide wider support for lifestyle adaptation and transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerry Chen & Li Wan, 2024. "Remote working and experiential wellbeing: A latent lifestyle perspective using UK time use survey before and during COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305096
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305096
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0305096&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0305096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Batty & Judith Clifton & Peter Tyler & Li Wan, 2022. "The post-Covid city [Mobility, environment, and inequalities in the post-Covid city]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(3), pages 447-457.
    2. Ferdinando Monte & Charly Porcher & Esteban Rossi-Hansberg, 2026. "Remote Work and City Structure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 116(8), pages 3152-3196, August.
    3. Arthur A. Stone & Stefan Schneider & Alan Krueger & Joseph E. Schwartz & Angus Deaton, 2018. "Experiential Wellbeing Data from the American Time Use Survey: Comparisons with Other Methods and Analytic Illustrations with Age and Income," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 359-378, February.
    4. Yungsoo Lee, 2021. "Activity Profiles among Older Adults: Latent Class Analysis Using the Korean Time Use Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Muzhi Zhou & Man-Yee Kan, 2021. "The varying impacts of COVID-19 and its related measures in the UK: A year in review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis & Brent H. Meyer, 2021. "COVID-19 Is a Persistent Reallocation Shock," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 111, pages 287-291, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Foliano, Francesca & Tonei, Valentina & Sevilla, Almudena, 2024. "Social restrictions, leisure and well-being," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Thi Truong An Hoang & Andreas Knabe, 2021. "Time Use, Unemployment, and Well-Being: An Empirical Analysis Using British Time-Use Data," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 2525-2548, August.
    3. Rémi Yin & Anthony Lepinteur & Andrew E Clark & Conchita d'Ambrosio, 2021. "Life Satisfaction and the Human Development Index Across the World," Working Papers halshs-03174513, HAL.
    4. Balgová, Mária & Trenkle, Simon & Zimpelmann, Christian & Pestel, Nico, 2022. "Job search during a pandemic recession: Survey evidence from the Netherlands," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    5. Asako Chiba & Kazuya Haganuma & Taisuke Nakata & Thuy Linh Nguyen & Reo Takaku, 2026. "COVID-19 Risk Perceptions After the End of the Public Health Emergency," Working Papers e224, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.
    6. Fernando E. Alvarez & Francisco J. Buera & Nicholas Trachter, 2026. "Technology Adoption and Optimal Policy," Working Papers 2026-59, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    7. Kasyanenko,Sergiy & Kenworthy,Philip George & Kilic Celik,Sinem & Ruch,Franz Ulrich & Vashakmadze,Ekaterine T. & Wheeler,Collette Mari, 2023. "The Past and Future of RegionalPotential Growth : Hopes, Fears, and Realities," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10368, The World Bank.
    8. Figura, Andrew & Waller, Chris, 2024. "What does the beveridge curve tell us about the likelihood of soft landings?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    9. Barrero, Jose Maria & Bloom, Nick & Davis, Steven J., 2020. "Why Working From Home Will Stick," SocArXiv wfdbe, Center for Open Science.
    10. Dong, Ding & Liu, Zheng & Wang, Pengfei, 2025. "Turbulent business cycles," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Enghin Atalay, 2024. "A twenty-first century of solitude? Time alone and together in the United States," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(1), pages 1-33, March.
    12. Jean-Victor Alipour, 2026. "Performance Pay in the Hybrid Work Economy," CESifo Working Paper Series 12680, CESifo.
    13. Lorenzo Aldeco Leo & Alejandrina Salcedo, 2024. "Remote Work and High Proximity Employment in Mexico," Working Papers 2024-17, Banco de México.
    14. Tito Boeri & Pierre Cahuc, 2022. "Labor Market Insurance Policies in the XXI Century," Post-Print hal-03878719, HAL.
    15. Leila Gautham & Clemens Hetschko & Peter Howley, 2025. "Not All Leisure Is Created Equal: Income-Induced Constraints on the Enjoyment of Leisure," CESifo Working Paper Series 12169, CESifo.
    16. Serdar Birinci & Yusuf Mercan & Kurt See, 2024. "Mismatch Unemployment During COVID-19 and the Post-Pandemic Labor Shortages," Research Working Paper RWP 24-10, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    17. Anna Davies & Betsy Donald & Mia Gray, 2023. "The power of platforms—precarity and place," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(2), pages 245-256.
    18. Nolan, Anne & Smyth, Emer, 2022. "Disrupted transitions: young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS142.
    19. Bick, Alexander & Blandin, Adam & Mertens, Karel & Rubinton, Hannah, 2024. "Work from Home and Migration," CEPR Discussion Papers 19101, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    20. Daniel S. Hamermesh, 2020. "Life satisfaction, loneliness and togetherness, with an application to Covid-19 lock-downs," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 983-1000, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0305096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.