IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0304519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing institutional conflicts: Stakeholder accounts of communication between conflict of interest and technology transfer offices

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew S McCoy
  • Michaela Ward
  • Rebecca Neergaard
  • Steven Joffe
  • Julia E Szymczak

Abstract

There have been repeated calls for academic institutions to develop policies and procedures to manage institutional conflicts of interest (ICOI) arising from technology transfer activities. While prior research has examined adoption of ICOI policies by medical schools and universities, little is known about how these institutions handle ICOI in practice, hindering the development of evidence-based recommendations to improve ICOI management. To address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 senior administrators responsible for research integrity and conflict of interest issues at academic institutions. Data were analyzed using a descriptive qualitative content analysis approach, combining flexible coding to index the interview data with close examination, interpretation, and synthesis of coded content. Participants identified communication and information sharing between conflict of interest (COI) and technology transfer (TT) offices as a critical factor in the effective management of ICOI and suggested several strategies to strengthen coordination between these offices. These findings suggest that academic research institutions could strengthen COI programs by taking measures to improve communication and information sharing between COI and TT offices.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew S McCoy & Michaela Ward & Rebecca Neergaard & Steven Joffe & Julia E Szymczak, 2024. "Managing institutional conflicts: Stakeholder accounts of communication between conflict of interest and technology transfer offices," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0304519
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304519
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304519&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0304519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O’Kane, Conor & Mangematin, Vincent & Geoghegan, Will & Fitzgerald, Ciara, 2015. "University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 421-437.
    2. Michelle M Mello & Lindsey Murtagh & Steven Joffe & Patrick L Taylor & Yelena Greenberg & Eric G Campbell, 2018. "Beyond financial conflicts of interest: Institutional oversight of faculty consulting agreements at schools of medicine and public health," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Brantnell, Anders & Baraldi, Enrico, 2022. "Understanding the roles and involvement of technology transfer offices in the commercialization of university research," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Conor O'Kane & Vincent Mangematin & Will Geoghegan & Ciara Fitzgerald, 2015. "University Technology Transfer offices : the search for identity to build legimacy," Post-Print hal-01072998, HAL.
    5. Walsh, John P. & Huang, Hsini, 2014. "Local context, academic entrepreneurship and open science: Publication secrecy and commercial activity among Japanese and US scientists," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 245-260.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aydemir, Nisa Yazici & Huang, Wan-Ling & Welch, Eric W., 2022. "Late-stage academic entrepreneurship: Explaining why academic scientists collaborate with industry to commercialize their patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Conor O’Kane & Urs Daellenbach & Sally Davenport & Simon Wakeman, 2024. "Stimulating R&D and Commercialization Activity in New Zealand: An Overview and Case Analysis of Callaghan Innovation’s Grants and Technology Incubator Programme," Annals of Science and Technology Policy, now publishers, vol. 8(1–2), pages 176-211, September.
    3. Hsieh Ru-Mei & Kelley Donna, 2020. "A Study of Key Indicators of Development for University-Based Entrepreneurship Ecosystems in Taiwan," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Laura Kreiling & Ahmed Bounfour, 2020. "A practice-based maturity model for holistic TTO performance management: development and initial use," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1718-1747, December.
    5. O'Kane, Conor & Mangematin, Vincent & Zhang, Jing A. & Cunningham, James A., 2020. "How university-based principal investigators shape a hybrid role identity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Delorme, Donatienne, 2023. "The role of proximity in the design of innovation intermediaries' business models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Albats, Ekaterina & Alexander, Allen T. & Cunningham, James A., 2022. "Traditional, virtual, and digital intermediaries in university-industry collaboration: exploring institutional logics and bounded rationality," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    8. Jianqiang Chen & Pei-Fang Hsieh & Po-Hsuan Hsu, 2024. "Recent Development of Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Programs in Taiwan," Annals of Science and Technology Policy, now publishers, vol. 8(1–2), pages 96-118, September.
    9. Soares, Thiago J. & Torkomian, Ana L.V., 2021. "TTO's staff and technology transfer: Examining the effect of employees' individual capabilities," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Noack, Anika & Jacobsen, Heike, 2021. "Transfer scouts: from intermediation to co-constructors of new knowledge and technologies in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    11. Lee, Kyootai & Jung, Hyun Ju, 2021. "Does TTO capability matter in commercializing university technology? Evidence from longitudinal data in South Korea," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    12. Kwak, Kiho & Yoon, Hyungseok (David), 2020. "Unpacking transnational industry legitimacy dynamics, windows of opportunity, and latecomers’ catch-up in complex product systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(4).
    13. Muralidharan Loganathan & M. H. Bala Subrahmanya, 2023. "Efficiency of Entrepreneurial Universities in India: A Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 1120-1144, June.
    14. Lutz Göcke & Kristina Hülsebusch & Matthias Menter, 2022. "The legitimacy of corporate entrepreneurship: a structured literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 385-416, June.
    15. Christopher S. Hayter & Andrew J. Nelson & Stephanie Zayed & Alan C. O’Connor, 2018. "Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 1039-1082, August.
    16. A. Alexander & D. P. Martin & C. Manolchev & K. Miller, 2020. "University–industry collaboration: using meta-rules to overcome barriers to knowledge transfer," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 371-392, April.
    17. Giuseppe Criaco & Davide Hahn & Tommaso Minola & Daniel Pittino, 2025. "The role of non-economic goals in academic spin-offs," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 668-691, April.
    18. Igors Skute, 2019. "Opening the black box of academic entrepreneurship: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(1), pages 237-265, July.
    19. Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes & Bruno Brandão Fischer & Sergio Salles-Filho & Nicholas Vonortas, 2024. "Drivers of Entrepreneurial Performance: An Assessment of the PIPE Program in Brazil," Annals of Science and Technology Policy, now publishers, vol. 8(1–2), pages 40-63, September.
    20. Fan-Chuan Tseng & Mu-Hsuan Huang & Dar-Zen Chen, 2020. "Factors of university–industry collaboration affecting university innovation performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 560-577, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0304519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.