IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0291497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deviation of peak hours for metro stations based on least square support vector machine

Author

Listed:
  • Lijie Yu
  • Mengying Cui
  • Shian Dai

Abstract

The station-level ridership during the peak hour is one of the key indicators for the design of station size and relevant facilities. However, with the operation of metro system, it cannot be ignored that, in many cities, the station peak and the city peak may not be simultaneously occurred. As the current ridership forecasting methods use the city peak as the point of reference, stations with wide differences of ridership in between would experience disorders due to serious underestimates of passenger demand during the actual peak. Accordingly, this study fully considers the phenomenon that the metro station peak is not identical to the city peak and focuses on the concept of the peak deviation coefficient (PDC), the ratio of the station peak ridership to the city peak ridership. It investigates how metro ridership determinants affects the PDC using the least square support vector machine (LSSVM) model. A land-use function complementarity index is employed as one of the independent variables, which is newly proposed in this study that describes the relationship of the commute land use around an individual station with that along the whole network. This method can help to resolve the ridership amplification indicator for a fine-grained station-level forecasting. The results for Xi’an metro indicate that the LSSVM is an effective method to scrutinize the nonlinear effects of e.g., land use attributes, on the temporal distribution features of the metro ridership. Compared to the ratio of commute land use measured for individual stations, the land-use function complementarity index can better explain and predict the severity of peak deviation phenomenon, controlling other independent variables in the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijie Yu & Mengying Cui & Shian Dai, 2023. "Deviation of peak hours for metro stations based on least square support vector machine," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291497
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291497
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291497&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0291497?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gutiérrez, Javier & Cardozo, Osvaldo Daniel & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2011. "Transit ridership forecasting at station level: an approach based on distance-decay weighted regression," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1081-1092.
    2. Chakour, Vincent & Eluru, Naveen, 2016. "Examining the influence of stop level infrastructure and built environment on bus ridership in Montreal," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 205-217.
    3. Cui, Boer & DeWeese, James & Wu, Hao & King, David A. & Levinson, David & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2022. "All ridership is local: Accessibility, competition, and stop-level determinants of daily bus boardings in Portland, Oregon," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Mengying Cui & David Levinson, 2018. "Accessibility analysis of risk severity," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1029-1050, July.
    5. Li, Shaoying & Lyu, Dijiang & Huang, Guanping & Zhang, Xiaohu & Gao, Feng & Chen, Yuting & Liu, Xiaoping, 2020. "Spatially varying impacts of built environment factors on rail transit ridership at station level: A case study in Guangzhou, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Lijie Yu & Quan Chen & Kuanmin Chen, 2019. "Deviation of Peak Hours for Urban Rail Transit Stations: A Case Study in Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Vergel-Tovar, C. Erik & Rodriguez, Daniel A., 2018. "The ridership performance of the built environment for BRT systems: Evidence from Latin America," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 172-184.
    8. Feng Xie & David M. Levinson, 2011. "Evolving Transportation Networks," Transportation Research, Economics and Policy, Springer, number 978-1-4419-9804-0, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Fan & Yang, Linchuan & Han, Chunyang & Tang, Jinjun & Li, Zhitao, 2022. "A network-distance-based geographically weighted regression model to examine spatiotemporal effects of station-level built environments on metro ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu & Liu, Chao, 2019. "How does the station-area built environment influence Metrorail ridership? Using gradient boosting decision trees to identify non-linear thresholds," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-78.
    3. Du, Qiang & Zhou, Yuqing & Huang, Youdan & Wang, Yalei & Bai, Libiao, 2022. "Spatiotemporal exploration of the non-linear impacts of accessibility on metro ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Su, Shiliang & Zhao, Chong & Zhou, Hao & Li, Bozhao & Kang, Mengjun, 2022. "Unraveling the relative contribution of TOD structural factors to metro ridership: A novel localized modeling approach with implications on spatial planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    5. Lanjing Wang & Chunli Zhao & Xiaofei Liu & Xumei Chen & Chaoyang Li & Tao Wang & Jiani Wu & Yi Zhang, 2021. "Non-Linear Effects of the Built Environment and Social Environment on Bus Use among Older Adults in China: An Application of the XGBoost Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Merkebe Getachew Demissie & Lina Kattan, 2022. "Understanding the temporal and spatial interactions between transit ridership and urban land-use patterns: an exploratory study," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 385-417, June.
    7. Ingvardson, Jesper Bláfoss & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2018. "How urban density, network topology and socio-economy influence public transport ridership: Empirical evidence from 48 European metropolitan areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 50-63.
    8. Tu, Wei & Cao, Rui & Yue, Yang & Zhou, Baoding & Li, Qiuping & Li, Qingquan, 2018. "Spatial variations in urban public ridership derived from GPS trajectories and smart card data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 45-57.
    9. Diab, Ehab & Kasraian, Dena & Miller, Eric J. & Shalaby, Amer, 2020. "The rise and fall of transit ridership across Canada: Understanding the determinants," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 101-112.
    10. Wang, Jing & Wan, Feng & Dong, Chunjiao & Yin, Chaoying & Chen, Xiaoyu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal effects of built environment factors on varying rail transit station ridership patterns," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    11. Aston, Laura & Currie, Graham & Kamruzzaman, Md. & Delbosc, Alexa & Teller, David, 2020. "Study design impacts on built environment and transit use research," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Marques, Samuel de França & Pitombo, Cira Souza, 2023. "Local modeling as a solution to the lack of stop-level ridership data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    13. Jiaoe Wang & Yanan Li & Jingjuan Jiao & Haitao Jin & Fangye Du, 2023. "Bus ridership and its determinants in Beijing: A spatial econometric perspective," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 383-406, April.
    14. Rao, Fujie & Pafka, Elek, 2021. "Shopping morphologies of urban transit station areas: A comparative study of central city station catchments in Toronto, San Francisco, and Melbourne," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    15. Simon Berrebi & Sanskruti Joshi & Kari E Watkins, 2020. "On Ridership and Frequency," Papers 2002.02493, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    16. Andersson, David Emanuel & Shyr, Oliver F. & Yang, Jimmy, 2021. "Neighbourhood effects on station-level transit use: Evidence from the Taipei metro," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Lyons, Torrey & Ewing, Reid & Tian, Guang, 2025. "Coverage vs frequency: Is spatial coverage or temporal frequency more impactful on transit ridership?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    18. Montero-Lamas, Yaiza & Fernández-Casal, Rubén & Varela-García, Francisco-Alberto & Orro, Alfonso & Novales, Margarita, 2024. "A spatial statistical approach to estimate bus stop demand using GIS-processed data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    19. Wu, Hao & Lee, Jinwoo (Brian) & Levinson, David, 2023. "The node-place model, accessibility, and station level transit ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    20. Karnberger, Stephan & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2020. "Network–wide prediction of public transportation ridership using spatio–temporal link–level information," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.