IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0291031.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

”What’s up with price controls?” Stakeholders’ views on the regulation of pharmaceutical pricing in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Ye Shing Lourdes Loh
  • Audrey K L Siah
  • Sharon G M Koh
  • Wing Loong Cheong
  • Tin Tin Su

Abstract

Escalating costs have made the accessibility of drugs one of the biggest challenges faced by the Malaysian government. The government agreed to regulate drug prices by means of external reference pricing, but its proposed policy had a setback owing to much opposition from the pharmaceutical industry. The policy did gain support from the public and from non-governmental organisations because it ensured easy access to affordable medicines. Comments from public consultations with key stakeholders were used to explore stakeholders’ perceptions of the external reference pricing policy. A total of 140 comments were analysed for this study. Stakeholders’ views were classified as being from the Socioeconomic, industrial, and government sectors. To summarise, the government must carefully manage and consider stakeholders’ views to ensure a sound policy. Using Mendelow’s stakeholder mapping, this study mapped out stakeholders’ views in a systematic approach. The classification of different stakeholders’ views and recommendations led to suggestions for reviewing current practices in pharmaceutical pricing regulations in the Malaysian healthcare system. The analyses can be extended to other countries that face similar concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye Shing Lourdes Loh & Audrey K L Siah & Sharon G M Koh & Wing Loong Cheong & Tin Tin Su, 2023. "”What’s up with price controls?” Stakeholders’ views on the regulation of pharmaceutical pricing in Malaysia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291031
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291031&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0291031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0216563 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Boris Kaiser & Christian Schmid, 2016. "Does Physician Dispensing Increase Drug Expenditures? Empirical Evidence from Switzerland," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(1), pages 71-90, January.
    3. Shui Ling Wong & Saliza Ibrahim & Norazlin Abdul Kadir & Salbiah Mohd Salleh, 2019. "Access and Affordability of Medicines in Malaysia: Need for a National Pricing Policy," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 641-654, October.
    4. Luca Maini & Fabio Pammolli, 2023. "Reference Pricing as a Deterrent to Entry: Evidence from the European Pharmaceutical Market," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 345-383, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Müller, Tobias & Schmid, Christian & Gerfin, Michael, 2023. "Rents for Pills: Financial incentives and physician behavior," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Daniel Burkhard & Christian P. R. Schmid & Kaspar Wüthrich, 2019. "Financial incentives and physician prescription behavior: Evidence from dispensing regulations," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(9), pages 1114-1129, September.
    3. Alexander Ahammer & Ivan Zilic, 2017. "Do Financial Incentives Alter Physician Prescription Behavior? Evidence from Random Patient-GP Allocations," Working Papers 1701, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    4. Stacherl, Barbara & Renner, Anna-Theresa & Weber, Daniela, 2023. "Financial incentives and antibiotic prescribing patterns: Evidence from dispensing physicians in a public healthcare system," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    5. Ben Greiner & Le Zhang & Chengxiang Tang, 2017. "Separation of prescription and treatment in health care markets: A laboratory experiment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(S3), pages 21-35, December.
    6. Huong Thi Thanh Nguyen & Dai Xuan Dinh & Trung Duc Nguyen & Van Minh Nguyen, 2021. "Availability, prices and affordability of essential medicines: A cross-sectional survey in Hanam province, Vietnam," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Luke Connelly & Gianluca Fiorentini & Marica Iommi, 2022. "Supply-side solutions targeting demand-side characteristics: causal effects of a chronic disease management program on adherence and health outcomes," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(7), pages 1203-1220, September.
    8. Boris Kaiser, 2017. "Gender-specific practice styles and ambulatory health care expenditures," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(9), pages 1157-1179, December.
    9. Olivia Bodnar & Hugh Gravelle & Nils Gutacker & Annika Herr, 2024. "Financial incentives and prescribing behavior in primary care," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 696-713, April.
    10. Fabienne Loetscher, Christian P.R. Schmid, Michael Gerfin, "undated". "The effect of higher out-of-pocket payments on drug prices and demand," Diskussionsschriften dp2405, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    11. Lagarde, Mylène & Blaauw, Duane, 2022. "Overtreatment and benevolent provider moral hazard: Evidence from South African doctors," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Chi Shen & Qiwei Deng & Sha Lai & Liu Yang & Dantong Zhao & Yaxin Zhao & Zhongliang Zhou, 2024. "New evidence on supplier-induced demand in China’s public tertiary hospitals: is the cost of hospitalization higher in the off-season?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(6), pages 951-962, August.
    13. Giovanny Leon & Christophe Carbonel & Aparajit Rampuria & Ravindra Singh Rajpoot & Parth Joshi & Panos Kanavos, 2025. "An assessment of the implications of distribution remuneration and taxation policies on the final prices of prescription medicines: evidence from 35 countries," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 26(3), pages 513-536, April.
    14. Hjalmarsson, Linn & Schmid, Christian P.R. & Schreiner, Nicolas, 2024. "A Prescription for Knowledge: Patient Information and Generic Substitution," Working papers 2024/05, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    15. Zhou, Cuihua & Hao, Yifei & Lan, Yanfei & Li, Weifeng, 2023. "To introduce or not? Strategic analysis of hospital operations with telemedicine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 292-307.
    16. Henry, Edward & Cullinan, John, 2021. "Mental health spillovers from serious family illness: Doubly robust estimation using EQ-5D-5L population normative data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    17. Lagarde, Mylène & Blaauw, Duane, 2022. "Overtreatment and benevolent provider moral hazard: evidence from South African doctors," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115383, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Antonova, Anastasiia & Matvieiev, Mykhailo, 2025. "News and firm entry: The role of the waiting option," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    19. Rachamin, Yael & Meier, Rahel & Valeri, Fabio & Rosemann, Thomas & Muheim, Leander, 2021. "Physician-dispensing as a determinant of clinical and process measurements in patients at increased cardiovascular risk: A cross-sectional study in Swiss general practice," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(10), pages 1305-1310.
    20. Leon, Giovanny & Carbonel, Christophe & Rampuria, Aparajit & Singh Rajpoot, Ravindra & Joshi, Parth & Kanavos, Panos, 2025. "An assessment of the implications of distribution remuneration and taxation policies on the final prices of prescription medicines: evidence from 35 countries," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124243, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.