IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0287313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breaking the mold: Study strategies of students who improve their achievement on introductory biology exams

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda J Sebesta
  • Elena Bray Speth

Abstract

Students’ use of learning strategies (i.e., what students do when studying) is linked to their achievement in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) courses, and several study strategies have been individually associated with course and exam grades in multiple contexts. In this study, we surveyed students in a learner-centered, large-enrollment introductory biology course about their study strategies. We aimed to identify groups of strategies that students often reported together, possibly reflecting broader approaches to studying. Exploratory factor analysis revealed three groups of study strategies frequently co-reported (which we named housekeeping strategies, use of course materials, and metacognitive strategies). These strategy groups map onto a model of learning that associates specific suites of strategies to phases of learning, which correspond to different levels of cognitive and metacognitive engagement. Consistent with previous work, only some study strategies were significantly associated with exam scores: students reporting higher use of course materials and of metacognitive strategies earned higher scores on the first course exam. Students who improved on the subsequent course exam reported increasing their use of housekeeping strategies and of course materials. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of students’ approaches to studying in introductory college biology and of the relationships between study strategies and achievement. This work may support instructors in adopting intentional classroom practices to foster students’ development as self-regulated learners, able to identify expectations and criteria for success and to implement appropriate and effective study strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda J Sebesta & Elena Bray Speth, 2023. "Breaking the mold: Study strategies of students who improve their achievement on introductory biology exams," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0287313
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287313
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287313&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0287313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prof. N. A. Khan, 2007. "Productivity of Human Resource in Higher Education," Journal of Commerce and Trade, Society for Advanced Management Studies, vol. 2(2), pages 54-62, October.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0213827 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Kara, Elif & Tonin, Mirco & Vlassopoulos, Michael, 2021. "Class size effects in higher education: Differences across STEM and non-STEM fields," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Oecd, 2007. "On the Edge: Securing a Sustainable Future for Higher Education," OECD Education Working Papers 7, OECD Publishing.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0189610 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goller, Daniel & Diem, Andrea & Wolter, Stefan C., 2023. "Sitting next to a dropout: Academic success of students with more educated peers," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Opatrny, Matej & Havranek, Tomas & Irsova, Zuzana & Scasny, Milan, 2023. "Publication Bias and Model Uncertainty in Measuring the Effect of Class Size on Achievement," CEPR Discussion Papers 18159, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Stratton, Leslie S., 2017. "Housing Prices, Unemployment Rates, Disadvantage, and Progress toward a Degree," IZA Discussion Papers 10941, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Kerry Shephard & Kim Brown & Tess Guiney, 2017. "Researching the Professional-Development Needs of Community-Engaged Scholars in a New Zealand University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-11, July.
    5. James Swansson & Deborah Blackman, 2009. "Governance in Australian Universities: Where Next?," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 7(2), pages 39-46, 07.
    6. Giovanni Gallo & Claudia Garofoli, 2023. "Proxying the socio-economic background through real estate values. An application on performances of university students," Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP) 0184, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    7. Bernhofer, Juliana & Tonin, Mirco, 2022. "The effect of the language of instruction on academic performance," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Bucci, Alberto & Carbonari, Lorenzo & Trivin, Pedro & Trovato, Giovanni, 2025. "Human capital-based growth with depopulation and class-size effects: theory and empirics," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29, pages 1-1, January.
    9. Ross Guest & Nicholas Rohde & Saroja Selvanathan & Tommy Soesmanto, 2017. "Student satisfaction and online teaching," Discussion Papers in Economics economics:201707, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    10. Xuehan Zhou & Liping Ma & Shangcong Bu & Wei Ha, 2025. "Class Size and Student Academic and Behavioral Performance in College Synchronous Online Courses," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 66(3), pages 1-33, May.
    11. Modena, Francesca & Rettore, Enrico & Tanzi, Giulia Martina, 2022. "Asymmetries in the gender effect of high-performing peers: Evidence from tertiary education," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Hua Cheng & Zhiying Zhang & Qing Huang & Zhongju Liao, 2020. "The effect of university–industry collaboration policy on universities’ knowledge innovation and achievements transformation: based on innovation chain," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 522-543, April.
    13. Daniel Goller & Andrea Diem & Stefan C. Wolter, 2022. "Sitting next to a dropout: Study success of students with peers that came to the lecture hall by a different route," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0190, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    14. Michele Gubello & Nora Strecker, 2024. "A Theory of Perverse Redistribution in Higher Education and Income Tax Progressivity in Europe," LIS Working papers 889, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    15. Philip Vaughter & Tarah Wright & Marcia McKenzie & Lauri Lidstone, 2013. "Greening the Ivory Tower: A Review of Educational Research on Sustainability in Post-Secondary Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Aloys Prinz & Thomas Ehrmann, 2022. "Academia as a league system," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(7), pages 1065-1092, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0287313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.