IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0286148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability of online dental final exams in the pre and post COVID-19 era: A comparative study

Author

Listed:
  • Hung Trong Hoang
  • Phuong Thao Nguyen
  • Nam Cong-Nhat Huynh
  • Tam Thi-Thanh Nguyen
  • Trang Thi Huyen Tu
  • Michael George Botelho
  • Lan Van Nguyen
  • Kaori Shima
  • Tomonori Sasahira

Abstract

Amidst the fourth COVID-19 wave in Viet Nam, national lockdowns necessitated the closure of numerous dental schools. To assess DDS (Doctor of Dental Surgery) graduation exams, this study analyzed their 2021 implementation in comparison to onsite exams conducted in 2020 and 2022 at the Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam (FOS-UMPH). The final online examination comprises two main sessions: a synchronous online examination using FOS-UMPH e-Learning for theories (consisting of 200 MCQs and 3 written tests with 3 clinical situations needed be solved) and a synchronous online examination using Microsoft Teams for practicum (comprising of 12 online OSCE stations). The final grades were evaluated using the same metrics in face-to-face final examinations in 2022 and 2020. A total of 114, 112 and 95 students were recruited for the first-time exams in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. In order to analyze the reliability, histogram and k-mean clustering were employed. The histograms from 2020, 2021 and 2022 showed a striking similarity. However, fewer students failed in 2021 and 2022 (13% and 12.6%, respectively) compared to 2020 (28%), with clinical problem-solving part grades (belonging to theory session) being notably higher in 2021 and 2022. Intriguingly, the MCQ Score results showed the identical patterns. The courses of orthodontics, dental public health, and pediatrics subjects (in the group of prevention and development dentistry) stood out for their exceptional accuracy across both sessions. After examining data gathered over three years, we identified three distinct clusters: the first comprised of scattered average and low scores, the second characterized by high scores but unstable and scattered and the third cluster boasting consistently high and centered scores. According to our study, online and onsite traditional graduation exam results are relatively equivalent, but additional measures are necessary to standardize the final examination and adapt to the new normal trend in dental education.

Suggested Citation

  • Hung Trong Hoang & Phuong Thao Nguyen & Nam Cong-Nhat Huynh & Tam Thi-Thanh Nguyen & Trang Thi Huyen Tu & Michael George Botelho & Lan Van Nguyen & Kaori Shima & Tomonori Sasahira, 2023. "Reliability of online dental final exams in the pre and post COVID-19 era: A comparative study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-13, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286148
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286148
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0286148&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0286148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. A. Hartigan & M. A. Wong, 1979. "A K‐Means Clustering Algorithm," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 28(1), pages 100-108, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kolos Cs. Ágoston & Marianna E.-Nagy, 2024. "Mixed integer linear programming formulation for K-means clustering problem," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 32(1), pages 11-27, March.
    2. Zhang, Weibin & Zha, Huazhu & Zhang, Shuai & Ma, Lei, 2023. "Road section traffic flow prediction method based on the traffic factor state network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 618(C).
    3. Jelle R Dalenberg & Luca Nanetti & Remco J Renken & René A de Wijk & Gert J ter Horst, 2014. "Dealing with Consumer Differences in Liking during Repeated Exposure to Food; Typical Dynamics in Rating Behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    4. Custodio João, Igor & Lucas, André & Schaumburg, Julia & Schwaab, Bernd, 2023. "Dynamic clustering of multivariate panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    5. Gnidchenko, A., 2025. "World trade concentration and product market segregation," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 66(1), pages 36-53.
    6. Kumar, Sandeep & Chakraverty, S. & Sethi, Narayan, 2025. "Assessing changes in wealth index using primary survey data," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Utkarsh J. Dang & Michael P.B. Gallaugher & Ryan P. Browne & Paul D. McNicholas, 2023. "Model-Based Clustering and Classification Using Mixtures of Multivariate Skewed Power Exponential Distributions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 40(1), pages 145-167, April.
    8. Bernd Scherer & Diogo Judice & Stephan Kessler, 2010. "Price reversals in global equity markets," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(5), pages 332-345, December.
    9. Ugofilippo Basellini & Carlo Giovanni Camarda, 2020. "Modelling COVID-19 mortality at the regional level in Italy," Working Papers axq0sudakgkzhr-blecv, French Institute for Demographic Studies.
    10. Evgeny Kagan & Alexander Novoselsky & Alexander Rybalov, 2025. "Fuzzy Clustering with Uninorm-Based Distance Measure," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Jing Xiao & Qiongqiong Xu & Chuanli Wu & Yuexia Gao & Tianqi Hua & Chenwu Xu, 2016. "Performance Evaluation of Missing-Value Imputation Clustering Based on a Multivariate Gaussian Mixture Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Humberto Elias Garcia Lopes & Marlusa de Sevilha Gosling, 2021. "Cluster Analysis in Practice: Dealing with Outliers in Managerial Research," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(1), pages 200081-2000.
    13. Mónika-Anetta Alt & Vizeli Ibolya, 2021. "Identifying Relevant Segments of Potential Banking Chatbot Users Based on Technology Adoption Behavior," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 33(2), pages 165-183.
    14. Naderi, Mehrdad & Hung, Wen-Liang & Lin, Tsung-I & Jamalizadeh, Ahad, 2019. "A novel mixture model using the multivariate normal mean–variance mixture of Birnbaum–Saunders distributions and its application to extrasolar planets," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 126-138.
    15. Alan Fernihough & Kevin Hjortshøj, 2021. "Coal and the European Industrial Revolution," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(635), pages 1135-1149.
    16. Mohiuddin, Hossain & Fitch-Polse, Dillon T. & Handy, Susan L., 2024. "Examining market segmentation to increase bike-share use and enhance equity: The case of the greater Sacramento region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 279-290.
    17. Hyukjun Gweon, 2023. "A power-controlled reliability assessment for multi-class probabilistic classifiers," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 17(4), pages 927-949, December.
    18. Owen Forbes & Edgar Santos-Fernandez & Paul Pao-Yen Wu & Hong-Bo Xie & Paul E Schwenn & Jim Lagopoulos & Lia Mills & Dashiell D Sacks & Daniel F Hermens & Kerrie Mengersen, 2023. "clusterBMA: Bayesian model averaging for clustering," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-23, August.
    19. HaiYun Wang & JianPing Zhao & ChunHou Zheng & YanSen Su, 2022. "scDSSC: Deep Sparse Subspace Clustering for scRNA-seq Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Roberto Benocci & Giovanni Brambilla & Alessandro Bisceglie & Giovanni Zambon, 2020. "Eco-Acoustic Indices to Evaluate Soundscape Degradation Due to Human Intrusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0286148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.