IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0280014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of life in adults with Down syndrome: A mixed methods systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Ogochukwu Ann Ijezie
  • Jane Healy
  • Philip Davies
  • Emili Balaguer-Ballester
  • Vanessa Heaslip

Abstract

Background: As the life expectancy of adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with Down syndrome increases for a plethora of reasons including recognition of rights, access, and technological and medical advances, there is a need to collate evidence about their quality of life. Objective: Using Schalock and Verdugo’s multidimensional quality of life assessment model, this systematic review aimed to identify, synthesise and integrate the quantitative and qualitative evidence on quality of life in adults with Down syndrome via self-and proxy-reporting. Methods: Five databases were systematically searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify relevant articles published between 1980 and 2022 along with grey literature and reference lists from relevant studies. A mixed methods systematic review was performed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology using the convergent integrated approach. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Thirty-nine studies were included: 20 quantitative, 17 qualitative, and 2 mixed methods studies. The synthesised findings were grouped into the 8 core domains of quality of life: personal development, self-determination, interpersonal relations, social inclusion, rights, emotional, physical and material well-being. Of the 39 studies, 30 (76.92%) reported on emotional well-being and 10 (25.64%) on rights. Only 7 (17.94%) studies reported that adults with Down syndrome have a good quality of life centred around self-determination and interpersonal relations. Most adults with Down syndrome wanted to become more independent, have relationships, participate in the community, and exercise their human rights. Self-reported quality of life from adults with Down syndrome was rated higher than proxy reported quality of life. Discrepancies in quality of life instruments were discovered. Conclusion: This review highlighted the need for a better systematic approach to improving the quality of life in adults with Down syndrome in targeted areas. Future research is required to evaluate self-and proxy-reporting methods and culture-specific quality of life instruments that are more appropriate for adults with Down syndrome. In addition, further studies should consider including digital assistive technologies to obtain self-reported quality of life data in adults with Down syndrome. International prospective register of systematic reviews registration number: CRD42019140056.

Suggested Citation

  • Ogochukwu Ann Ijezie & Jane Healy & Philip Davies & Emili Balaguer-Ballester & Vanessa Heaslip, 2023. "Quality of life in adults with Down syndrome: A mixed methods systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-27, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280014
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280014
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0280014&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0280014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albrecht, Gary L. & Devlieger, Patrick J., 1999. "The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 977-988, April.
    2. Venera Krasniqi & Katerina Zdravkova & Fisnik Dalipi, 2022. "Impact of Assistive Technologies to Inclusive Education and Independent Life of Down Syndrome Persons: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Mario Fernando Jojoa-Acosta & Sara Signo-Miguel & Maria Begoña Garcia-Zapirain & Mercè Gimeno-Santos & Amaia Méndez-Zorrilla & Chandan J. Vaidya & Marta Molins-Sauri & Myriam Guerra-Balic & Olga Bruna, 2021. "Executive Functioning in Adults with Down Syndrome: Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Inhibitory Capacity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Anna Lee & Kathleen Knafl & Marcia Van Riper, 2021. "Family Variables and Quality of Life in Children with Down Syndrome: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-27, January.
    5. Ruth Cabeza-Ruiz & Francisco Javier Alcántara-Cordero & Isaac Ruiz-Gavilán & Antonio Manuel Sánchez-López, 2019. "Feasibility and Reliability of a Physical Fitness Test Battery in Individuals with Down Syndrome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-11, July.
    6. Fatma Haddad & Jenny Bourke & Kingsley Wong & Helen Leonard, 2018. "An investigation of the determinants of quality of life in adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Jannike Gottschalk Ballo, 2020. "Labour Market Participation for Young People with Disabilities: The Impact of Gender and Higher Education," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(2), pages 336-355, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anita Hubley & Lara Russell & Anita Palepu & Stephen Hwang, 2014. "Subjective Quality of Life Among Individuals who are Homeless: A Review of Current Knowledge," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 509-524, January.
    2. S. Bentolhoda Mousavi & Dusica Lecic-Tosevski & Hassan Khalili & S. Zeinab Mousavi, 2020. "To be able, or disable, that is the question: A critical discussion on how language affects the stigma and self-determination in people with parability," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(5), pages 424-430, August.
    3. Octave Jokung & Serge Macé, 2013. "Long-term health investment when people underestimate their adaptation to old age-related health problems," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(6), pages 1003-1013, December.
    4. Thébaut, Clémence, 2013. "Dealing with moral dilemma raised by adaptive preferences in health technology assessment: The example of growth hormones and bilateral cochlear implants," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 102-109.
    5. Chen, Duan-Rung & Chang, Ly-Yun & Yang, Meng-Li, 2008. "Gender-specific responses to social determinants associated with self-perceived health in Taiwan: A multilevel approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(10), pages 1630-1640, November.
    6. Thomas Butt & Adnan Tufail & Gary Rubin, 2017. "Health State Utility Values for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Review and Advice," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 23-32, February.
    7. Banister, David & Bowling, Ann, 2004. "Quality of life for the elderly: the transport dimension," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 105-115, April.
    8. Carole Bonnet & Sandrine Juin & Anne Laferrère, 2019. "Private Financing of Long‑Term Care: Income, Savings and Reverse Mortgages," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 507-508, pages 5-24.
    9. Alison Dougall & Francisca Martinez Pereira & Gustavo Molina & Caroline Eschevins & Blánaid Daly & Denise Faulks, 2018. "Identifying common factors of functioning, participation and environment amongst adults requiring specialist oral health care using the International Classification of Functioning, disability and heal," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Marchesano, Katia & Musella, Marco, 2020. "Does volunteer work affect life satisfaction of participants with chronic functional limitations? An empirical investigation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    11. Schünemann, Johannes & Strulik, Holger & Trimborn, Timo, 2017. "Going from bad to worse: Adaptation to poor health health spending, longevity, and the value of life," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 130-146.
    12. Anna Demianova & Anna Lukiyanova, 2016. "The impact of disability status on labor supply in Russia," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 44, pages 50-74.
    13. Ann Bowling & Zahava Gabriel, 2004. "An Integrational Model of Quality of Life in Older Age. Results from the ESRC/MRC HSRC Quality of Life Survey in Britain," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 1-36, October.
    14. Carlos Capella-Peris & Mary M. Cosgrove & Irene C. Chrismer & M. Sonia Razaqyar & Jeffrey S. Elliott & Anna Kuo & Magalie Emile-Backer & Katherine G. Meilleur, 2020. "Understanding Symptoms in RYR1-Related Myopathies: A Mixed-Methods Analysis Based on Participants’ Experience," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 13(4), pages 423-434, August.
    15. Macé, Serge & Le Lec, Fabrice, 2011. "On fatalistic long-term health behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 434-439, June.
    16. Ballo, Jannike Gottschalk, 2023. "Is the disability wage gap a gendered inequality? Evidence from a 13-year full population study from Norway," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    17. Tracey McDonald & Frances Russell, 2019. "Long‐Term Care Quality‐of‐Life Scale utility in community home care," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 494-500, December.
    18. Leena Eklund Karlsson & Kristine Crondahl & Fredrik Sunnemark & Åsa Andersson, 2013. "The Meaning of Health, Well-Being, and Quality of Life Perceived by Roma People in West Sweden," Societies, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Marta Barazzetta & Simon Appleton & Trudy Owens, 2020. "Hedonic Adaptation to Treatment: Evidence from a Medical Intervention," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 613-629, March.
    20. Yen, Dorothy & Cohen, Geraldine & Wei, Liyuan & Asaad, Yousra, 2022. "Towards a framework of healthy aging practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 176-187.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0280014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.