IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0273108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Living with a left ventricular assist device: Capturing recipients experiences using group concept mapping software

Author

Listed:
  • Anita L Slade
  • Margaret E O’Hara
  • David Quinn
  • Laura Marley
  • Stephen Griffith
  • Melanie Calvert
  • M Sayeed Haque
  • Hoong Sern Lim
  • Philippa Doherty
  • Deirdre A Lane

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation significantly impacts on a recipient’s symptoms and quality of life. Capturing their experiences and post implant journey is an important part of clinical practice, research and device design evolution. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are a useful tool for capturing that experience. However, patient reported outcome measures need to reflect recipients’ experiences. Discussions with a patient partner group found that none of the frequently used cardiology PROMs captured their unique experiences. Aims: To capture the experiences and important issues for LVAD recipients. Develop a conceptual map of domains and items that should be reflected in patient reported outcomes. Methods: Group concept mapping (GCM) web-based software was used to remotely capture and structure recipients’ experiences across a wide geographical area. GCM is a semi-quantitative mixed method consisting of 3 stages: item generation, item sorting and rating (importance, relevance and frequency). Patient partners were involved in all aspects of the study design and development. Results: 18 LVAD recipients consented to take part. 101 statements were generated and multi-dimensional scaling, and hierarchical cluster analysis identified 9 clusters. Cluster themes included: Activities, Partner/family support, Travel, Mental wellbeing, Equipment and clothing, Physical and cognitive limitations, LVAD Restrictions, LVAD Challenges and positive impact of the LVAD (LVAD Positives). LVAD Positives were scored highest across all the rating variables, e.g., frequency (2.85), relevance (2.44) and importance (2.21). Other domains rated high for importance included physical and cognitive limitations (2.19), LVAD restrictions (2.11), Partner/family support (2.02), and Equipment and clothing (2.01). Conclusion: Online GCM software facilitated the inclusion of geographically dispersed recipients and provided useful insights into the experiences of LVAD recipients. The conceptual framework identifies important domains and items that should be prioritised and included in patient reported outcomes in future research, LVAD design evolution, and clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Anita L Slade & Margaret E O’Hara & David Quinn & Laura Marley & Stephen Griffith & Melanie Calvert & M Sayeed Haque & Hoong Sern Lim & Philippa Doherty & Deirdre A Lane, 2022. "Living with a left ventricular assist device: Capturing recipients experiences using group concept mapping software," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0273108
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273108
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273108&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0273108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosas, Scott R. & Kane, Mary, 2012. "Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 236-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Borge & Stefanie Bröring, 2020. "What affects technology transfer in emerging knowledge areas? A multi-stakeholder concept mapping study in the bioeconomy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 430-460, April.
    2. Amal Chakraborty & Natasha J. Howard & Mark Daniel & Alwin Chong & Nicola Slavin & Alex Brown & Margaret Cargo, 2021. "Prioritizing Built Environmental Factors to Tackle Chronic and Infectious Diseases in Remote Northern Territory (NT) Communities of Australia: A Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Chun, JongSerl & Kim, Jinyung & Lee, Serim, 2023. "Development of a cyberbullying victimization scale for adolescents in South Korea," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Stephen T. Homer, 2023. "Perceptions of smart sustainable cities: a scale development study," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3363-3388, August.
    5. Sandesh Pantha & Martin Jones & Richard Gray, 2022. "Development of a Guideline to Enhance the Reporting of Concept Mapping Research: Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-9, June.
    6. Rosas, Scott R. & Ridings, John W., 2017. "The use of concept mapping in measurement development and evaluation: Application and future directions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 265-276.
    7. Miller, J. Jay & Duron, Jacquelynn F. & Donohue-Dioh, Jessica & Geiger, Jennifer M., 2018. "Conceptualizing effective legal representation for Foster youth: A group concept mapping study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 271-278.
    8. Janet Gray & Carrie Petrucci & Connie Engel & Nyisha Green-Washington & Nancy Buermeyer, 2024. "Development of Systemic Interventions to Decrease Breast Cancer Risk: A Group Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Herbell, Kayla & Albright, Nathaniel & Berger, Sophie & Stanek, Charis & Helsabeck, Nathan P., 2025. "Identifying family engagement priorities in youth residential treatment settings: A group concept mapping study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Marta Roczniewska & Emma Hedberg Rundgren & Henna Hasson & Arnold B. Bakker & Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, 2022. "How Should Job Crafting Interventions Be Implemented to Make Their Effects Last? Protocol for a Group Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-10, October.
    11. Erin A. Smyth & Alex Donaldson & Michael K. Drew & Miranda Menaspa & Jennifer Cooke & Sara A. Guevara & Craig Purdam & Craig Appaneal & Rebecca Wiasak & Liam Toohey, 2022. "What Contributes to Athlete Performance Health? A Concept Mapping Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Jay Miller, J. & Benner, Kalea & Thrasher, Shawndaya & Pope, Natalie & Dumas, Tamikia & Damron, Larry J. & Segress, Melissa & Niu, Chunling, 2017. "Planning a mentorship initiative for foster parents: Does gender matter?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 78-84.
    13. Rosas, Scott R. & Smith, Corey & Eenigenburg, Avery & BaileyShea, Chelsea & Jerome, Kathleen & Millane, Maureen, 2022. "A large-scale, geographical approach to using group concept mapping for planning: The Teen Opinions Count (TOC) project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Houle, Andrée-Anne & Besnard, Thérèse & Bérubé, Annie & Dagenais, Christian, 2018. "Factors that influence parent recruitment into prevention programs in early childhood: A concept map of parents', practitioners', and administrators' points of view," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 127-136.
    15. Valenti, Michael & Celedonia, Karen L. & Wall-Parker, April & Strickler, Amy, 2020. "Trust is essential: Identifying trust building techniques from youth providers across the service array," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    16. Orsi, Rebecca, 2017. "Use of multiple cluster analysis methods to explore the validity of a community outcomes concept map," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 277-283.
    17. Dave, Gaurav & Frerichs, Leah & Jones, Jennifer & Kim, Mimi & Schaal, Jennifer & Vassar, Stefanie & Varma, Deepthi & Striley, Catherine & Ruktanonchai, Corrine & Black, Adina & Hankins, Jennifer & Lov, 2018. "Conceptualizing trust in community-academic research partnerships using concept mapping approach: A multi-CTSA study," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 70-78.
    18. Ashlee N. Sawyer & Madison Combs & Viktor Clark & Eric K. Soule & Joseph G. L. Lee & Alison B. Breland, 2023. "Reactions to a Hypothetical Menthol Cigarette Ban among Sexual- and Gender-Minoritized Communities: A Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.
    19. Stoyanov, Slavi & Jablokow, Kathryn & Rosas, Scott R. & Wopereis, Iwan G.J.H. & Kirschner, Paul A., 2017. "Concept mapping—An effective method for identifying diversity and congruity in cognitive style," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 238-244.
    20. Askelson, Natoshia & Ryan, Grace & McRee, Annie-Laurie & Farris, Paige E. & Shannon, Jackilen & Hanson, Jessica & Kenyon, DenYelle Baete & Daly, Eliza & Avdic, Lejla, 2021. "Using concept mapping to identify opportunities for HPV vaccination efforts: Perspectives from the Midwest and West Coast," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0273108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.