IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0270587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the socio-demographic, economic and clinical (SDEC) factors on health related quality of life (HRQoL) of hypertensive patients using EQ-5D-5L scoring algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Nousheen Aslam
  • Muhammad Harris Shoaib
  • Rabia Bushra
  • Saima Asif
  • Yusra Shafique

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the various socio-demographic, economic, and clinical variables (SDECVs) which influence the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of hypertensive patients. Three hundred and fifty hypertensive patients participated in this study through a structured questionnaire and EQ 5D 5L. 211(60.28%) participants had stage 1, and 139 (39.7%) had stage 2 hypertension. No participants reported severe problems in any domain on EQ 5D 5L. Generalize Linear Model (GLM) was used to assess the association between HRQoL and SDECVs. The mean utility and VAS score was 0.64 (±0.15) and 63.17 (±11.01) respectively. The participants of the stage 1 hypertension group had a significantly better score on each domain of EQ 5D 5L as compared to stage 1 (0.027, 0.010, 0.00, 0.00, 0.048). No participant in either group reported extreme problems in any domain. Among socio-demographic factors, the males, non-smokers, income sharing, and healthy normal hypertensive patients had better HRQoL (0.009, 0.016, 0.019, and 0.003). A lower cost of treatment was also associated with better HRQoL (0.017). Among clinical variables, stage 1 hypertension had better HRQoL than stage 2(0.035). The number of prescribed antihypertensive drugs had no effect on the quality of life (0.253), however, the non-pharmacologic interventions such as reduction in salt and oil consumption (0.035), reduction in beverages consumption (0.0014) and increased water intake (0.010) had resulted in better QoL. The patients who reported dizziness had poor HRQoL while patients who had cardiac problems and diabetes reported a significantly lower EQ-VAS score. The effect of gender on the HRQoL of hypertensive patients who had comorbid conditions was significant in the case of renal, respiratory, visual problems, and dizziness where females had a lesser utility score than males. The study reports on significant determinants which should be taken into account in an attempt to improve the health-related quality of life of hypertensive patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Nousheen Aslam & Muhammad Harris Shoaib & Rabia Bushra & Saima Asif & Yusra Shafique, 2022. "Evaluating the socio-demographic, economic and clinical (SDEC) factors on health related quality of life (HRQoL) of hypertensive patients using EQ-5D-5L scoring algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0270587
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0270587
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0270587&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0270587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. M. Arif & Shujaat Farooq, 2014. "Rural Poverty Dynamics in Pakistan: Evidence from Three Waves of the Panel Survey," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 71-98.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amjad, Rashid, 2017. "Remittances and Poverty: A Comparison of Bangladesh and Pakistan, 2000–2016," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 40(3-4), pages 75-104, Sep-Dec.
    2. Rashid Amjad, 2012. "Stagflation, the Labor Market Impact, and the Poverty Puzzle in Pakistan: A Preliminary Analysis," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 17(Special E), pages 51-71, September.
    3. Rishi Kumar, 2022. "Household poverty dynamics in tribal Madhya Pradesh, India: A case study of 54 villages," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 184-203, June.
    4. Tabish Nawab & Saqlain Raza & Malik Shahzad Shabbir & Ghulam Yahya Khan & Sana Bashir, 2023. "Multidimensional poverty index across districts in Punjab, Pakistan: estimation and rationale to consolidate with SDGs," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1301-1325, February.
    5. Xuefang Liang & Yousheng Zhang & Junhui Tan & Hong Chen & Malik Shahzad Shabbir, 2024. "The Dynamic Relationship Between Multidimensional Energy Poverty and Social Wellbeing’s," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 641-654, January.
    6. Atta Khan & Abdul Saboor & Ikram Ali & Wasim Malik & Khalid Mahmood, 2016. "Urbanization of multidimensional poverty: empirical evidences from Pakistan," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 439-469, January.
    7. Hameed, Abdul & Padda, Ihtsham ul Haq & Karim, Shahid, 2016. "Multidimensional Poverty Mapping for Rural Pakistan," MPRA Paper 85022, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Ayuya, Oscar I. & Gido, Eric O. & Bett, Hillary K. & Lagat, Job K. & Kahi, Alexander K. & Bauer, Siegfried, 2015. "Effect of Certified Organic Production Systems on Poverty among Smallholder Farmers: Empirical Evidence from Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 27-37.
    9. Shujaat Farooq & Durr-e Nayab, 2023. "The Role of BISP’s Unconditional Cash Transfers in Alleviating Extreme Poverty in Pakistan: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis for the Period 2011–2019," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 439-464, April.
    10. Rashida Haq, 2015. "Shocks as a Source of Vulnerability: An Empirical Investigation from Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 54(3), pages 245-272.
    11. Abdul Saboor & Maria Manzoor & Atta Khan, 2016. "Time use poverty and gender inequality: empirical evidences from Punjab," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 421-438, January.
    12. Rashida Haq, 2012. "Shocks as a Source of Vulnerability: An Empirical Investigation from Pakistan," Poverty and Social Dynamics Paper Series 2012:06, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    13. Abdul Hameed & Zara Qaiser, 2019. "Estimating Social Exclusion in Rural Pakistan: A Contribution to Social Development Policies," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 11(1), pages 103-122, March.
    14. Shujaat Farooq & Zunaira Younais, 2018. "Do Non-farm Enterprises Offer Pathways for Upward Mobility in Rural Pakistan? Evidence from Panel Dataset," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 57(2), pages 203-221.
    15. Muhammad Jehangir Khan & G. M. Arif, 2016. "Household Charity in Pakistan: Magnitude, Determinants and Its Importance for the Well-being of Society," PIDE-Working Papers 2016:141, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    16. G. M. Arif & Durr-e-Nayab & Shujaat Farooq & Saman Nazir & Maryam Naeem Satti, 2012. "Welfare Impact of the Health Intervention in Pakistan: The Case of Lady Health Workers Programme," Poverty and Social Dynamics Paper Series 2012:07, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    17. Rashida Haq, 2015. "Quantifying Vulnerability to Poverty in a Developing Economy," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 54(4), pages 915-929.
    18. Shujaat Farooq & Usman Ahmad, 2020. "Economic Growth and Rural Poverty in Pakistan: A Panel Dataset Analysis," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(4), pages 1128-1150, September.
    19. Hania Afzal & Henna Ahsan, 2021. "Poverty Trend in Pakistan: A Glimpse from Last Two Decades," PIDE Knowledge Brief 2021:26, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    20. G. M. Arif & Shujaat Farooq & Saman Nazir & Maryam Satti, 2014. "Child Malnutrition and Poverty: The Case of Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 99-118.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0270587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.