IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0267178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survival and inactivation kinetics of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in irradiated and natural poultry litter microcosms

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Gutierrez
  • Keith R Schneider

Abstract

The use of poultry litter as a biological soil amendment presents a risk for the preharvest contamination of fresh produce by Salmonella. In order to properly assess this risk, it is important to understand the factors influencing the persistence of Salmonella in poultry litter. This research was performed to investigate the influence of indigenous microflora on the survival of Salmonella Typhimurium in poultry litter. Microcosms of irradiated (sterilized) and natural poultry litter were inoculated with S. Typhimurium, adjusted to pH 8.0, 0.92 water activity (aw), and stored at 30°C for 6 days. S. Typhimurium populations (log CFU g-1) declined in both litter treatments and there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in recovery between litter treatments on any sampling days (0 to 6). The pH of the natural litter significantly increased (P

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Gutierrez & Keith R Schneider, 2022. "Survival and inactivation kinetics of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in irradiated and natural poultry litter microcosms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0267178
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267178
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267178&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0267178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao Chen & Xiuping Jiang, 2014. "Microbiological Safety of Chicken Litter or Chicken Litter-Based Organic Fertilizers: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Sofia Soares & Carla Miranda & Ana Claudia Coelho & Henrique Trindade, 2023. "Occurrence of Coliforms and Enterococcus Species in Drinking Water Samples Obtained from Selected Dairy Cattle Farms in Portugal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.
    3. Muthu Manikandan & Sechul Chun & Zakayo Kazibwe & Judy Gopal & Udai Bhan Singh & Jae-Wook Oh, 2020. "Phenomenal Bombardment of Antibiotic in Poultry: Contemplating the Environmental Repercussions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. David Fangueiro & Paula Alvarenga & Rita Fragoso, 2021. "Horticulture and Orchards as New Markets for Manure Valorisation with Less Environmental Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, January.
    5. Xuanyang Li & Baoming Li & Qin Tong, 2020. "The Effect of Drying Temperature on Nitrogen Loss and Pathogen Removal in Laying Hen Manure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, January.
    6. Margaret Kyakuwaire & Giregon Olupot & Alice Amoding & Peter Nkedi-Kizza & Twaha Ateenyi Basamba, 2019. "How Safe is Chicken Litter for Land Application as an Organic Fertilizer?: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Edit Gorliczay & Imre Boczonádi & Nikolett Éva Kiss & Florence Alexandra Tóth & Sándor Attila Pabar & Borbála Biró & László Renátó Kovács & János Tamás, 2021. "Microbiological Effectivity Evaluation of New Poultry Farming Organic Waste Recycling," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Christy E. Manyi-Loh & Sampson N. Mamphweli & Edson L. Meyer & Golden Makaka & Michael Simon & Anthony I. Okoh, 2016. "An Overview of the Control of Bacterial Pathogens in Cattle Manure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-27, August.
    9. Bi, Shaojie & Qiao, Wei & Xiong, Linpeng & Ricci, Marina & Adani, Fabrizio & Dong, Renjie, 2019. "Effects of organic loading rate on anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 242-250.
    10. Karina Yévenes & Ekaterina Pokrant & Fernando Pérez & Ricardo Riquelme & Constanza Avello & Aldo Maddaleno & Betty San Martín & Javiera Cornejo, 2018. "Assessment of Three Antimicrobial Residue Concentrations in Broiler Chicken Droppings as a Potential Risk Factor for Public Health and Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Izabella Maj, 2022. "Significance and Challenges of Poultry Litter and Cattle Manure as Sustainable Fuels: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0267178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.