IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0253389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the performances of survival analysis regression models for analysis of conception modes and risk of type-1 diabetes among 1985–2015 Swedish birth cohort

Author

Listed:
  • Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe
  • Emma Norrman
  • Christina Bergh
  • Ulla-Britt Wennerholm
  • Max Petzold

Abstract

The goal is to examine the risk of conception mode-type-1 diabetes using different survival analysis modelling approaches and examine if there are differentials in the risk of type-1 diabetes between children from fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers. We aimed to compare the performances and fitness of different survival analysis regression models with the Cox proportional hazard (CPH) model used in an earlier study. The effect of conception modes and other prognostic factors on type-1 diabetes among children conceived either spontaneously or by assisted reproductive technology (ART) and its sub-groups was modelled in the earlier study. We used the information on all singleton children from the Swedish Medical Birth Register hosted by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, 1985 to 2015. The main explanatory variable was the mode of conception. We applied the CPH, parametric and flexible parametric survival regression (FPSR) models to the data at 5% significance level. Loglikelihood, Akaike and Bayesian information criteria were used to assess model fit. Among the 3,138,540 singletons, 47,938 (1.5%) were conceived through ART (11,211 frozen-thawed transfer and 36,727 fresh embryo transfer). In total, 18,118 (0.58%) of the children had type-1 diabetes, higher among (0.58%) those conceived spontaneously than the ART-conceived (0.42%). The median (Interquartile range (IQR)) age at onset of type-1 diabetes among spontaneously conceived children was 10 (14–6) years, 8(5–12) for ART, 6 (4–10) years for frozen-thawed embryo transfer and 9 (5–12) years for fresh embryo transfer. The estimates from the CPH, FPSR and parametric PH models are similar. There was no significant difference in the risk of type-1 diabetes among ART- and spontaneously conceived children; FPSR: (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) = 1.070; 95% Confidence Interval (CI):0.929–1.232, p = 0.346) vs CPH: (aHR = 1.068; 95%CI: 0.927–1.230, p = 0.361). A sub-analysis showed that the adjusted hazard of type-1 diabetes was 37% (aHR = 1.368; 95%CI: 1.013–1.847, p = 0.041) higher among children from frozen-thawed embryo transfer than among children from spontaneous conception. The hazard of type-1 diabetes was higher among children whose mothers do not smoke (aHR = 1.296; 95%CI:1.240–1.354, p

Suggested Citation

  • Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe & Emma Norrman & Christina Bergh & Ulla-Britt Wennerholm & Max Petzold, 2021. "Comparison of the performances of survival analysis regression models for analysis of conception modes and risk of type-1 diabetes among 1985–2015 Swedish birth cohort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0253389
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253389
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253389&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0253389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe & Karolina Karlsson & Jan Derks & Max Petzold, 2021. "Performance evaluation of survival regression models in analysing Swedish dental implant complication data with frailty," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Branko Miladinovic & Ambuj Kumar & Rahul Mhaskar & Sehwan Kim & Ronald Schonwetter & Benjamin Djulbegovic, 2012. "A Flexible Alternative to the Cox Proportional Hazards Model for Assessing the Prognostic Accuracy of Hospice Patient Survival," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-8, October.
    3. Benjamin Kearns & Matt D. Stevenson & Kostas Triantafyllopoulos & Andrea Manca, 2019. "Generalized Linear Models for Flexible Parametric Modeling of the Hazard Function," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 39(7), pages 867-878, October.
    4. Patrick Royston & Paul C. Lambert, 2011. "Flexible Parametric Survival Analysis Using Stata: Beyond the Cox Model," Stata Press books, StataCorp LP, number fpsaus, March.
    5. Paul C. Lambert & Patrick Royston, 2009. "Further development of flexible parametric models for survival analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 9(2), pages 265-290, June.
    6. Nicola Orsini, 2013. "Review of Flexible Parametric Survival Analysis Using Stata: Beyond the Cox Model by Patrick Royston and Paul C. Lambert," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 13(1), pages 212-216, March.
    7. Xudong Du & Mier Li & Ping Zhu & Ju Wang & Lisha Hou & Jijie Li & Hongdao Meng & Muke Zhou & Cairong Zhu, 2018. "Comparison of the flexible parametric survival model and Cox model in estimating Markov transition probabilities using real-world data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Kennedy N Otwombe & Max Petzold & Neil Martinson & Tobias Chirwa, 2014. "A Review of the Study Designs and Statistical Methods Used in the Determination of Predictors of All-Cause Mortality in HIV-Infected Cohorts: 2002–2011," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-6, February.
    9. Michael J. Crowther, 2019. "Multilevel mixed-effects parametric survival analysis: Estimation, simulation, and application," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 19(4), pages 931-949, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Royston, 2012. "Tools to simulate realistic censored survival-time distributions," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 12(4), pages 639-654, December.
    2. Noori Akhtar-Danesh, 2015. "A Comparison of Modeling Scales in Flexible Parametric Models," 2015 Stata Conference 15, Stata Users Group.
    3. Herrera Dappe,Matias & Melecky,Martin & Turkgulu,Burak, 2022. "Fiscal Risks from Early Termination of Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9972, The World Bank.
    4. H. Joseph Newton & Nicholas J. Cox, 2016. "The Stata Journal Editors' Prize 2016: Patrick Royston," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 16(4), pages 815-825, December.
    5. Ged Dempsey & Dan Hungerford & Phil McHale & Lauren McGarey & Edward Benison & Ben Morton, 2020. "Long term outcomes for elderly patients after emergency intensive care admission: A cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Herrera Dappe,Matias & Melecky,Martin & Turkgulu,Burak, 2022. "PPP Distress and Fiscal Contingent Liabilities in South Asia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10137, The World Bank.
    7. Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe & Karolina Karlsson & Jan Derks & Max Petzold, 2021. "Performance evaluation of survival regression models in analysing Swedish dental implant complication data with frailty," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Sambit Bhattacharyya & Michael Keller, 2021. "Resource Discovery and the Political Fortunes of National Leaders," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 88(349), pages 129-166, January.
    9. Jackson, Christopher, 2016. "flexsurv: A Platform for Parametric Survival Modeling in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 70(i08).
    10. Enzo Coviello, 2009. "Covariate-adjusted cumulative incidence in the presence of competing risks," Italian Stata Users' Group Meetings 2009 02, Stata Users Group.
    11. Erin E. Gabriel & Michael C. Sachs & Dean A. Follmann & Therese M‐L. Andersson, 2020. "A unified evaluation of differential vaccine efficacy," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1053-1063, December.
    12. Joshua S Davis & Vincent He & Nicholas M Anstey & John R Condon, 2014. "Long Term Outcomes Following Hospital Admission for Sepsis Using Relative Survival Analysis: A Prospective Cohort Study of 1,092 Patients with 5 Year Follow Up," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Talamas Marcos, Miguel Ángel, 2023. "Surviving Competition: Neighborhood Shops vs. Convenience Chains," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13018, Inter-American Development Bank.
    14. Iversen, Tor & Ching-to , Albert Ma, 2020. "Technology Adoption in Primary Health Care," HERO Online Working Paper Series 2020:4, University of Oslo, Health Economics Research Programme.
    15. Michael J. Crowther & Paul C. Lambert, 2012. "Simulating complex survival data," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 12(4), pages 674-687, December.
    16. Michael J. Crowther & Keith R. Abrams & Paul C. Lambert, 2013. "Joint modeling of longitudinal and survival data," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 13(1), pages 165-184, March.
    17. James P Cross & AustÄ— VaznonytÄ—, 2020. "Can we do what we say we will do? Issue salience, government effectiveness, and the legislative efficiency of Council Presidencies," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(4), pages 657-679, December.
    18. Ghanbariamin, Roksana & Chung, Bobby W., 2020. "The effect of the National Kidney Registry on the kidney-exchange market," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Martin Connock & Peter Auguste & Xavier Armoiry, 2021. "A comparison of published time invariant Markov models with Partitioned Survival models for cost effectiveness estimation; three case studies of treatments for glioblastoma multiforme," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(1), pages 89-100, February.
    20. Anne J Rerimoi & Momodou Jasseh & Schadrac C Agbla & Georges Reniers & Anna Roca & Ian M Timæus, 2019. "Under-five mortality in The Gambia: Comparison of the results of the first demographic and health survey with those from existing inquiries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0253389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.