IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0245824.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MultipleTesting.com: A tool for life science researchers for multiple hypothesis testing correction

Author

Listed:
  • Otília Menyhart
  • Boglárka Weltz
  • Balázs Győrffy

Abstract

Scientists from nearly all disciplines face the problem of simultaneously evaluating many hypotheses. Conducting multiple comparisons increases the likelihood that a non-negligible proportion of associations will be false positives, clouding real discoveries. Drawing valid conclusions require taking into account the number of performed statistical tests and adjusting the statistical confidence measures. Several strategies exist to overcome the problem of multiple hypothesis testing. We aim to summarize critical statistical concepts and widely used correction approaches while also draw attention to frequently misinterpreted notions of statistical inference. We provide a step-by-step description of each multiple-testing correction method with clear examples and present an easy-to-follow guide for selecting the most suitable correction technique. To facilitate multiple-testing corrections, we developed a fully automated solution not requiring programming skills or the use of a command line. Our registration free online tool is available at www.multipletesting.com and compiles the five most frequently used adjustment tools, including the Bonferroni, the Holm (step-down), the Hochberg (step-up) corrections, allows to calculate False Discovery Rates (FDR) and q-values. The current summary provides a much needed practical synthesis of basic statistical concepts regarding multiple hypothesis testing in a comprehensible language with well-illustrated examples. The web tool will fill the gap for life science researchers by providing a user-friendly substitute for command-line alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Otília Menyhart & Boglárka Weltz & Balázs Győrffy, 2021. "MultipleTesting.com: A tool for life science researchers for multiple hypothesis testing correction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0245824
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245824
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245824&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0245824?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bajgrowicz, Pierre & Scaillet, Olivier, 2012. "Technical trading revisited: False discoveries, persistence tests, and transaction costs," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(3), pages 473-491.
    2. Lihua Lei & William Fithian, 2018. "AdaPT: an interactive procedure for multiple testing with side information," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 80(4), pages 649-679, September.
    3. Cai, T. Tony & Sun, Wenguang, 2009. "Simultaneous Testing of Grouped Hypotheses: Finding Needles in Multiple Haystacks," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(488), pages 1467-1481.
    4. Efron B. & Tibshirani R. & Storey J.D. & Tusher V., 2001. "Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1151-1160, December.
    5. John D. Storey, 2002. "A direct approach to false discovery rates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(3), pages 479-498, August.
    6. Valentin Amrhein & Sander Greenland & Blake McShane, 2019. "Scientists rise up against statistical significance," Nature, Nature, vol. 567(7748), pages 305-307, March.
    7. Christopher R. Genovese & Kathryn Roeder & Larry Wasserman, 2006. "False discovery control with p-value weighting," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(3), pages 509-524, September.
    8. John P. A. Ioannidis, 2019. "Retiring statistical significance would give bias a free pass," Nature, Nature, vol. 567(7749), pages 461-461, March.
    9. James G. Scott & Ryan C. Kelly & Matthew A. Smith & Pengcheng Zhou & Robert E. Kass, 2015. "False Discovery Rate Regression: An Application to Neural Synchrony Detection in Primary Visual Cortex," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(510), pages 459-471, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikolaos Ignatiadis & Wolfgang Huber, 2021. "Covariate powered cross‐weighted multiple testing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(4), pages 720-751, September.
    2. Dennis Leung & Wenguang Sun, 2022. "ZAP: Z$$ Z $$‐value adaptive procedures for false discovery rate control with side information," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(5), pages 1886-1946, November.
    3. T. Tony Cai & Wenguang Sun & Weinan Wang, 2019. "Covariate‐assisted ranking and screening for large‐scale two‐sample inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 81(2), pages 187-234, April.
    4. Habiger, Joshua D. & Peña, Edsel A., 2014. "Compound p-value statistics for multiple testing procedures," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 153-166.
    5. Alejandro Ochoa & John D Storey & Manuel Llinás & Mona Singh, 2015. "Beyond the E-Value: Stratified Statistics for Protein Domain Prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Chen, Xiongzhi, 2019. "Uniformly consistently estimating the proportion of false null hypotheses via Lebesgue–Stieltjes integral equations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 724-744.
    7. Ang Li & Rina Foygel Barber, 2017. "Accumulation Tests for FDR Control in Ordered Hypothesis Testing," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(518), pages 837-849, April.
    8. Wesley Tansey & Yixin Wang & Raul Rabadan & David Blei, 2020. "Double Empirical Bayes Testing," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(S1), pages 91-113, December.
    9. Andrew Y. Chen, 2022. "Most claimed statistical findings in cross-sectional return predictability are likely true," Papers 2206.15365, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    10. Andrew Y. Chen, 2022. "Do t-Statistic Hurdles Need to be Raised?," Papers 2204.10275, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    11. Zhao, Haibing & Fung, Wing Kam, 2016. "A powerful FDR control procedure for multiple hypotheses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 60-70.
    12. Zhao, Haibing, 2014. "Adaptive FWER control procedure for grouped hypotheses," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 63-70.
    13. Vincent, Kendro & Hsu, Yu-Chin & Lin, Hsiou-Wei, 2021. "Investment styles and the multiple testing of cross-sectional stock return predictability," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    14. Tingting Cui & Pengfei Wang & Wensheng Zhu, 2021. "Covariate-adjusted multiple testing in genome-wide association studies via factorial hidden Markov models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(3), pages 737-757, September.
    15. Youngchao Ge & Sandrine Dudoit & Terence Speed, 2003. "Resampling-based multiple testing for microarray data analysis," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 12(1), pages 1-77, June.
    16. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    17. Dørum Guro & Snipen Lars & Solheim Margrete & Saebo Solve, 2011. "Smoothing Gene Expression Data with Network Information Improves Consistency of Regulated Genes," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, August.
    18. Sermpinis, Georgios & Hassanniakalager, Arman & Stasinakis, Charalampos & Psaradellis, Ioannis, 2021. "Technical analysis profitability and Persistence: A discrete false discovery approach on MSCI indices," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    19. Psaradellis, Ioannis & Laws, Jason & Pantelous, Athanasios A. & Sermpinis, Georgios, 2023. "Technical analysis, spread trading, and data snooping control," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 178-191.
    20. Guillermo Durand & Gilles Blanchard & Pierre Neuvial & Etienne Roquain, 2020. "Post hoc false positive control for structured hypotheses," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1114-1148, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0245824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.