IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0234603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The remanufacturing evaluation for feasibility and comprehensive benefit of retired grinding machine

Author

Listed:
  • Tianbai Ling
  • Yongyi He

Abstract

Grinding is the last and most important process of parts processing, the purpose is to achieve high precision and surface roughness. Therefore, grinding machine has the characteristics of high added value, high technology content and great remanufacturing value. However, the evaluation of machine tool remanufacturing is based on imprecise and fuzzy information at present. The aim of this study is to present the remanufacturing evaluation for feasibility and comprehensive benefit of retired grinder. Firstly, according to the unique structure of grinder, the feasibility evaluation model of grinder remanufacturing is established, including technical feasibility criterion, economic feasibility criterion and resource environment feasibility criterion. Secondly, the comprehensive benefit evaluation model of remanufacturing grinder is established, in which the weight of each evaluation criterion is determined by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Finally, combined with the remanufacturing case of the cylindrical grinder, the evaluation method is verified and analyzed. The results show that the remanufacturing of the waste grinding machine through the feasibility evaluation can obtain better comprehensive benefits, and the remanufacturer can get considerable benefits and reduce the potential risks in the remanufacturing process.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianbai Ling & Yongyi He, 2020. "The remanufacturing evaluation for feasibility and comprehensive benefit of retired grinding machine," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-33, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0234603
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234603
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234603&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0234603?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Korhonen, Pekka & Voutilainen, Raimo, 2006. "Finding the most preferred alliance structure between banks and insurance companies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 1285-1299, December.
    2. Pokharel, Shaligram & Liang, Yijiong, 2012. "A model to evaluate acquisition price and quantity of used products for remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 170-176.
    3. Martin Charter & Casper Gray, 2008. "Remanufacturing and product design," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3/4), pages 375-392.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gan, Shu-San & Pujawan, I. Nyoman & Suparno, & Widodo, Basuki, 2017. "Pricing decision for new and remanufactured product in a closed-loop supply chain with separate sales-channel," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 120-132.
    2. Gan, Shu San & Pujawan, I. Nyoman & Suparno, & Widodo, Basuki, 2015. "Pricing decision model for new and remanufactured short-life cycle products with time-dependent demand," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Sasha Shahbazi & Kerstin Johansen & Erik Sundin, 2021. "Product Design for Automated Remanufacturing—A Case Study of Electric and Electronic Equipment in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Yue Tan & Chunxiang Guo, 2019. "Research on Two-Way Logistics Operation with Uncertain Recycling Quality in Government Multi-Policy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Gönsch, Jochen, 2015. "A note on a model to evaluate acquisition price and quantity of used products for remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 277-284.
    6. Gunasekara, Lahiru & Robb, David J. & Zhang, Abraham, 2023. "Used product acquisition, sorting and disposition for circular supply chains: Literature review and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    7. Amin, Gholam R. & Ibn Boamah, Mustapha, 2023. "Modeling business partnerships: A data envelopment analysis approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 329-337.
    8. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2015. "Strategic and operational decisions under sales competition and collection competition for end-of-use products in remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 11-20.
    9. Pih-Shuw Chen & Jia-Jan Lee & Pei-Fen & Ou, 2020. "A Study of Taiwanese Banks’ Home Loan Life Insurance Attached to Home Loans," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11.
    10. Mohsen Zamani & Mahdi Abolghasemi & Seyed Mohammad Seyed Hosseini & Mir Saman Pishvaee, 2019. "Considering pricing and uncertainty in designing a reverse logistics network," Papers 1909.11633, arXiv.org.
    11. Georgios Lanaras-Mamounis & Anastasios Kipritsis & Thomas A. Tsalis & Konstantinos Ι. Vatalis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2022. "A Framework for Assessing the Contribution of Firms to Circular Economy: a Triple-Level Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    12. Gernot Lechner & Marc Reimann, 2013. "The effect of active used product acquisition on manufacturing and remanufacturing strategies," Working Paper Series, Social and Economic Sciences 2013-01, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Karl-Franzens-University Graz.
    13. Sarker, Bhaba R., 2014. "Consignment stocking policy models for supply chain systems: A critical review and comparative perspectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 52-67.
    14. Kumar Jena, Sarat & Sarmah, S.P, 2014. "Price competition and co-operation in a duopoly closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 346-360.
    15. Zhitao Xu & Shaligram Pokharel & Adel Elomri, 2023. "An eco-friendly closed-loop supply chain facing demand and carbon price uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 1041-1067, January.
    16. Liao, Haolan & Wu, Di & Wang, Yuhan & Lyu, Zeyu & Sun, Hongmei & Nie, Yongyou & He, He, 2022. "Impacts of carbon trading mechanism on closed-loop supply chain: A case study of stringer pallet remanufacturing," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    17. Kumar Mangla, Sachin & Börühan, Gülmüş & Ersoy, Pervin & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Song, Malin, 2021. "Impact of information hiding on circular food supply chains in business-to-business context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 1-18.
    18. Thanh-Tuyen Tran, 2019. "An Empirical Study by Applying Multi-Criteria Expertise Analytic Hierarchy Process Model in Evaluation," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 1-5.
    19. Sebsatiaan Lambalk & Frank Jan de Graaf, 2017. "Explaining the relationship between firm performance and corporate governance of Dutch non-life insurance companies: Dutch mutual and commercial companies compared," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 197-231, April.
    20. Zhigang Jiang & Shuo Zhu & Hua Zhang & Yanhong Wang, 2013. "Optimal Acquisition and Inventory Control for a Remanufacturing System," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-7, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0234603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.