IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0234469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of online communities and popularity of BBS in four Chinese universities

Author

Listed:
  • Hao-Nan Yang
  • Xin-Jian Xu
  • Haili Liang
  • Xiaofan Wang

Abstract

Online forums in Chinese universities play an important role in understanding collective behavior of college students. Of particular interest are community and popularity. We address these two issues by examining data from Bulletin Board Systems (BBSs) of four Chinese universities. To characterize users’ behavior, we introduce a hypothesis test to infer individual preferred boards, which yields a polarization of users. We also perform a multilevel algorithm to detect communities of each BBS network. We measure the similarity between the board-preferred polarization and the algorithmically identified community structure by quantitative and visual tools. The resulting discrepancy indicates that board labels are inadequate to represent underlying communities. To reveal online popularity, we employ latent Dirichlet allocation to mine topics from threads to compare popularity in different universities. Based on which, we implement the Cox-Stuart test to explore the change in popularity over time and reproduce significantly ascending and descending topics around a decade. Finally, we devise a two-step model based on users’ preference and interests to reproduce the observed connectivity patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao-Nan Yang & Xin-Jian Xu & Haili Liang & Xiaofan Wang, 2020. "A comparative study of online communities and popularity of BBS in four Chinese universities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0234469
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234469
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234469&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0234469?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeff Alstott & Ed Bullmore & Dietmar Plenz, 2014. "powerlaw: A Python Package for Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Distributions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Yi-Shan Sung & Dashun Wang & Soundar Kumara, 2018. "Uncovering the effect of dominant attributes on community topology: A case of facebook networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 1041-1052, October.
    3. Guillaume, Jean-Loup & Latapy, Matthieu, 2006. "Bipartite graphs as models of complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 371(2), pages 795-813.
    4. Yi-Shan Sung & Dashun Wang & Soundar Kumara, 0. "Uncovering the effect of dominant attributes on community topology: A case of facebook networks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-12.
    5. Mayer, Adalbert & Puller, Steven L., 2008. "The old boy (and girl) network: Social network formation on university campuses," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 329-347, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Arcidiacono & Esteban Aucejo & Andrew Hussey & Kenneth Spenner, 2013. "Racial Segregation Patterns in Selective Universities," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 1039-1060.
    2. Donald R. Davis & Jonathan I. Dingel & Joan Monras & Eduardo Morales, 2019. "How Segregated Is Urban Consumption?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(4), pages 1684-1738.
    3. Sumeet Kumar & Binxuan Huang & Ramon Alfonso Villa Cox & Kathleen M. Carley, 2021. "An anatomical comparison of fake-news and trusted-news sharing pattern on Twitter," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 109-133, June.
    4. Jorge Peña & Yannick Rochat, 2012. "Bipartite Graphs as Models of Population Structures in Evolutionary Multiplayer Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Gil S. Epstein & Odelia Heizler-Cohen, 2016. "The Formation of Immigrant Networks in the Short and the Long Run," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Marcos Hideyuki Yokoyama & Tomoki Sekiguchi, 2014. "The Use of Social Network Sites in the Workplace: a Case Study in Brazilian Companies," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 11(2), pages 87-114, March.
    7. Rediet Abebe & Nicole Immorlica & Jon Kleinberg & Brendan Lucier & Ali Shirali, 2022. "On the Effect of Triadic Closure on Network Segregation," Papers 2205.13658, arXiv.org.
    8. Rutten, Philip & Lees, Michael H. & Klous, Sander & Sloot, Peter M.A., 2021. "Intermittent and persistent movement patterns of dance event visitors in large sporting venues," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 563(C).
    9. Heather Mathews & Alexander Volfovsky, 2023. "Community informed experimental design," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(4), pages 1141-1166, October.
    10. repec:mod:depeco:0002 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Jovanovic, Franck & Schinckus, Christophe, 2016. "Breaking down the barriers between econophysics and financial economics," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 256-266.
    12. Murat, Marina, 2014. "Out of Sight, Not Out of Mind. Education Networks and International Trade," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 53-66.
    13. Rita Strohmaier & Marlies Schuetz & Simone Vannuccini, 2019. "A systemic perspective on socioeconomic transformation in the digital age," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(3), pages 361-378, September.
    14. Khalilzadeh, Jalayer, 2022. "It is a small world, or is it? A look into two decades of tourism system," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 606(C).
    15. Seth D. Zimmerman, 2019. "Elite Colleges and Upward Mobility to Top Jobs and Top Incomes," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(1), pages 1-47, January.
    16. Yann Bramoullé & Bernard Fortin, 2009. "The Econometrics of Social Networks," Cahiers de recherche 0913, CIRPEE.
    17. Murat Marina, 2017. "International Students and Investments Abroad," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-33, March.
    18. Schulz, Jan & Mayerhoffer, Daniel M., 2021. "A network approach to consumption," BERG Working Paper Series 173, Bamberg University, Bamberg Economic Research Group.
    19. Lockwood, Ben & Porcelli, Francesco & Redoano, Michela & Schiavone, Antonio, 2022. "Yardstick Competition in the Digital Age : Unveiling New Networks in Tax Competition," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1438, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    20. Li, Heyang & Wu, Meijun & Wang, Yougui & Zeng, An, 2022. "Bibliographic coupling networks reveal the advantage of diversification in scientific projects," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    21. Jiaqi Liang & Linjing Li & Daniel Zeng, 2018. "Evolutionary dynamics of cryptocurrency transaction networks: An empirical study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0234469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.