IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0185883.html

Productivity cost due to postpartum ill health: A cross-sectional study in Sri Lanka

Author

Listed:
  • Nuwan Darshana Wickramasinghe
  • Jennifer Horton
  • Ishani Darshika
  • Kaushila Dinithi Galgamuwa
  • Wasantha Pradeep Ranasinghe
  • Thilini Chanchala Agampodi
  • Suneth Buddhika Agampodi

Abstract

Objective: Even though postpartum morbidity continues to cause high disease burden in maternal morbidity and mortality across the globe, the literature pertaining to resultant productivity loss is scarce. Hence, the present study aimed at determining the productivity loss and associated cost of episodes of postpartum ill health. Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted in two Medical Officer of Heath areas in the Anuradhapura district, Sri Lanka in 2011, among 407 women residing in Anuradhapura district with an infant aged between 8 to 24 weeks. Validated interviewer administered questionnaires, including the IMMPACT productivity cost tool, were used to collect data on self-reported episodes of postpartum ill health. The productivity loss was calculated as the sum of days lost due to partial and total incapacitation. The adjusted productivity loss for coping strategies was calculated. Productivity cost, both total and adjusted, were calculated based on the mean daily per capita income of the study sample. Results: Of the 407 participants, 161(39.6%) reported at least one episode of postpartum illness. Hospitalisations were reported by 27 (16.8%) of all symptomatic postpartum women. Common symptoms of postpartum ill health were pain/infection at either episiotomy or surgical site (n = 44, 27.3%), lower abdominal pain (n = 40, 24.8%) and backache (n = 27, 16.8%). The mean productivity loss per episode of ill health was 15 days (SD = 7.8 days) and the mean productivity loss per episode after adjusting for coping strategies was 7.9 days (SD = 4.4 days). The mean productivity cost per an episode was US$ 34.2(95%CI US$ 26.7–41.6) and the mean productivity cost per an episode after adjusting for coping strategies was US$ 18.0 (95%CI US$ 14.1–22.0) Conclusions: The prevalence of self-reported postpartum ill health, associated productivity loss and cost were high in the study sample and the main contributors were preventable conditions including pain and infection. Thus, effective pain management and proper infection prevention and control measures are important in reducing the burden of postpartum illness and resultant productivity cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuwan Darshana Wickramasinghe & Jennifer Horton & Ishani Darshika & Kaushila Dinithi Galgamuwa & Wasantha Pradeep Ranasinghe & Thilini Chanchala Agampodi & Suneth Buddhika Agampodi, 2017. "Productivity cost due to postpartum ill health: A cross-sectional study in Sri Lanka," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0185883
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185883
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0185883&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0185883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suneth Agampodi & Thilini Agampodi & Nuwan Wickramasinghe & Santhushya Fernando & Umanga Chathurani & Wathsala Adhikari & Ishani Dharshika & Dhanaseela Nugegoda & Samath Dharmaratne & David Newlands, 2012. "Productivity Cost Due to Maternal Ill Health in Sri Lanka," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-5, August.
    2. repec:wbk:wbpubs:7039 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0185883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.