IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0145421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hardness Analysis and Empirical Studies of the Relations among Robustness, Topology and Flow in Dynamic Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Xing Zhou
  • Wei Peng
  • Zhen Xu
  • Bo Yang

Abstract

Network robustness is the ability of a network to maintain performance after disruption, thus it is an important index for network designers to refer to. Every actual network has its own topology structure, flow magnitude (scale) and flow distribution. How the robustness relates to these factors still remains unresolved. To analyze the relations, we first established a robustness problem model, studied the hardness of a special case of the model, and generated a lot of representative network instances. We conducted experiments on these instances, deleting 5% to 50% edges on each instance and found that the robustness of a network has an approximate linearity to its structural entropy and flow entropy, when the correlation coefficient between the structure and flow is fixed. We also found that robustness is unlikely to have a relation to the flow scale and edge scale in our model. The empirical studies thus can provide a way of quickly estimating the robustness of real-world networks by using the regression coefficients we obtained during the experiments. We conducted computation on a real-world dataset and got favorable results, which exhibited the effectiveness of the estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing Zhou & Wei Peng & Zhen Xu & Bo Yang, 2015. "Hardness Analysis and Empirical Studies of the Relations among Robustness, Topology and Flow in Dynamic Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-29, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0145421
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0145421
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0145421&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0145421?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy C Matisziw & Tony H Grubesic & Junyu Guo, 2012. "Robustness Elasticity in Complex Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Sun, Shiwen & Li, Ruiqi & Wang, Li & Xia, Chengyi, 2015. "Reduced synchronizability of dynamical scale-free networks with onion-like topologies," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 249-256.
    3. Sun, Shiwen & Liu, Zhongxin & Chen, Zengqiang & Yuan, Zhuzhi, 2007. "Error and attack tolerance of evolving networks with local preferential attachment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 373(C), pages 851-860.
    4. Réka Albert & Hawoong Jeong & Albert-László Barabási, 2000. "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6794), pages 378-382, July.
    5. Chen, Zengqiang & Dehmer, Matthias & Shi, Yongtang, 2015. "Bounds for degree-based network entropies," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 265(C), pages 983-993.
    6. Jose L. Walteros & Panos M. Pardalos, 2012. "Selected Topics in Critical Element Detection," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Nicholas J. Daras (ed.), Applications of Mathematics and Informatics in Military Science, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 9-26, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. López, Fernando A. & Páez, Antonio & Carrasco, Juan A. & Ruminot, Natalia A., 2017. "Vulnerability of nodes under controlled network topology and flow autocorrelation conditions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 77-87.
    2. Liu, Xiaoxiao & Sun, Shiwen & Wang, Jiawei & Xia, Chengyi, 2019. "Onion structure optimizes attack robustness of interdependent networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).
    3. Milena Oehlers & Benjamin Fabian, 2021. "Graph Metrics for Network Robustness—A Survey," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-48, April.
    4. repec:plo:pone00:0135333 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Alice Paul & Susan E. Martonosi, 2024. "The all-pairs vitality-maximization (VIMAX) problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 1019-1048, July.
    6. Jalili, Mahdi, 2011. "Error and attack tolerance of small-worldness in complex networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 422-430.
    7. Liu, Xiaolei & Lei, Zengxiang & Duan, Zhengyu, 2024. "Assessing metro network vulnerability with turn-back operations: A Monte Carlo method," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 646(C).
    8. Sun, Shiwen & Li, Ruiqi & Wang, Li & Xia, Chengyi, 2015. "Reduced synchronizability of dynamical scale-free networks with onion-like topologies," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 249-256.
    9. Hao, Yucheng & Jia, Limin & Wang, Yanhui, 2020. "Edge attack strategies in interdependent scale-free networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    10. Ma, A. & Mondragón, R.J., 2012. "Evaluation of network robustness using a node tearing algorithm," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(24), pages 6674-6681.
    11. Wang, Zhuoyang & Chen, Guo & Hill, David J. & Dong, Zhao Yang, 2016. "A power flow based model for the analysis of vulnerability in power networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 460(C), pages 105-115.
    12. Ryan M. Hynes & Bernardo S. Buarque & Ronald B. Davies & Dieter F. Kogler, 2020. "Hops, Skip & a Jump - The Regional Uniqueness of Beer Styles," Working Papers 202013, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    13. Lenore Newman & Ann Dale, 2007. "Homophily and Agency: Creating Effective Sustainable Development Networks," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 79-90, February.
    14. Aybike Ulusan & Ozlem Ergun, 2018. "Restoration of services in disrupted infrastructure systems: A network science approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, February.
    15. Yang, Hyeonchae & Jung, Woo-Sung, 2016. "Structural efficiency to manipulate public research institution networks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 21-32.
    16. Alexander Shiroky & Andrey Kalashnikov, 2021. "Mathematical Problems of Managing the Risks of Complex Systems under Targeted Attacks with Known Structures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-11, October.
    17. Anand, Kartik & Gai, Prasanna & Marsili, Matteo, 2012. "Rollover risk, network structure and systemic financial crises," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 1088-1100.
    18. Yao, Jialing & Sun, Bingbin & Xi, lifeng, 2019. "Fractality of evolving self-similar networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 515(C), pages 211-216.
    19. Sanjeev Goyal & Adrien Vigier, 2014. "Attack, Defence, and Contagion in Networks," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 81(4), pages 1518-1542.
    20. Britta Hoyer & Kris De Jaegher, 2023. "Network disruption and the common-enemy effect," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(1), pages 117-155, March.
    21. Zhou, Yaoming & Wang, Junwei, 2018. "Efficiency of complex networks under failures and attacks: A percolation approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 658-664.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0145421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.