IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0012782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using ESPEN data for evidence-based control of neglected tropical diseases in sub-Saharan Africa: A comprehensive model-based geostatistical analysis of soil-transmitted helminths

Author

Listed:
  • Jessie Jane Khaki
  • Mark Minnery
  • Emanuele Giorgi

Abstract

Background: The Expanded Special Project for the Elimination of Neglected Tropical Diseases (ESPEN) was launched in 2019 by the World Health Organization and African nations to combat Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs), including Soil-transmitted helminths (STH), which still affect over 1.5 billion people globally. In this study, we present a comprehensive geostatistical analysis of publicly available STH survey data from ESPEN to delineate inter-country disparities in STH prevalence and its environmental drivers while highlighting the strengths and limitations that arise from the use of the ESPEN data. To achieve this, we also propose the use of calibration validation methods to assess the suitability of geostatistical models for disease mapping at the national scale. Methods: We analysed the most recent survey data with at least 50 geo-referenced observations, and modelled each STH species data (hookworm, roundworm, whipworm) separately. Binomial geostatistical models were developed for each country, exploring associations between STH and environmental covariates, and were validated using the non-randomized probability integral transform. We produced pixel-, subnational-, and country-level prevalence maps for successfully calibrated countries. All the results were made publicly available through an R Shiny application. Results: Among 35 countries with STH data that met our inclusion criteria, the reported data years ranged from 2004 to 2018. Models from 25 countries were found to be well-calibrated. Spatial patterns exhibited significant variation in STH species distribution and heterogeneity in spatial correlation scale (1.14 km to 3,027.44 km) and residual spatial variation variance across countries. Conclusion: This study highlights the utility of ESPEN data in assessing spatial variations in STH prevalence across countries using model-based geostatistics. Despite the challenges posed by data sparsity which limit the application of geostatistical models, the insights gained remain crucial for directing focused interventions and shaping future STH assessment strategies within national control programs. Author summary: The Expanded Special Project for the Elimination of Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs, ESPEN) was established in 2019 to help monitor and control NTDs such as Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) in African countries. We carried out a geostatistical analysis of STH data for 35 countries from the ESPEN database. Separate geostatistical models were developed for each country to tailor the selection of spatial covariates and estimation of covariance parameters to the unique spatial patterns across countries. Moreover, it was observed that the geostatistical models exhibited inadequate calibration in some countries, and thus carrying out spatial predictions at unsampled locations was not possible. These findings urge caution in developing an Africa-wide model based solely on ESPEN data, given the observed heterogeneity in the model parameter estimates and the challenges encountered in model calibration across different species and countries. Despite challenges posed by data sparsity, the insights gained remain crucial for directing focused interventions and shaping future STH assessment strategies within national control programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessie Jane Khaki & Mark Minnery & Emanuele Giorgi, 2025. "Using ESPEN data for evidence-based control of neglected tropical diseases in sub-Saharan Africa: A comprehensive model-based geostatistical analysis of soil-transmitted helminths," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0012782
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0012782
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0012782&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012782?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giorgi, Emanuele & Diggle, Peter J., 2017. "PrevMap: An R Package for Prevalence Mapping," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 78(i08).
    2. Claudia Czado & Tilmann Gneiting & Leonhard Held, 2009. "Predictive Model Assessment for Count Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1254-1261, December.
    3. Peter J. Diggle & Emanuele Giorgi, 2016. "Model-Based Geostatistics for Prevalence Mapping in Low-Resource Settings," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(515), pages 1096-1120, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James Mitchell & Martin Weale, 2023. "Censored density forecasts: Production and evaluation," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(5), pages 714-734, August.
    2. Lu, Ye & Suthaharan, Neyavan, 2023. "Electricity price spike clustering: A zero-inflated GARX approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    3. Snyder, Ralph D. & Ord, J. Keith & Beaumont, Adrian, 2012. "Forecasting the intermittent demand for slow-moving inventories: A modelling approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 485-496.
    4. Diebold, Francis X. & Shin, Minchul & Zhang, Boyuan, 2023. "On the aggregation of probability assessments: Regularized mixtures of predictive densities for Eurozone inflation and real interest rates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    5. Antonio Bracale & Pasquale De Falco, 2015. "An Advanced Bayesian Method for Short-Term Probabilistic Forecasting of the Generation of Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Anja Mühlemann & Philip Stange & Antoine Faul & Serena Lozza-Fiacco & Rowan Iskandar & Manuela Moraru & Susanne Theis & Petra Stute & Ben D Spycher & David Ginsbourger, 2025. "Comparing imputation approaches to handle systematically missing inputs in risk calculators," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-26, January.
    7. Xueli Wang & Moqin Zhou & Jinzhu Jia & Zhi Geng & Gexin Xiao, 2018. "A Bayesian Approach to Real-Time Monitoring and Forecasting of Chinese Foodborne Diseases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Reihaneh Entezari & Patrick E. Brown & Jeffrey S. Rosenthal, 2020. "Bayesian spatial analysis of hardwood tree counts in forests via MCMC," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), June.
    9. Moritz Berger & Gerhard Tutz, 2021. "Transition models for count data: a flexible alternative to fixed distribution models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(4), pages 1259-1283, October.
    10. Julius Ssempiira & Betty Nambuusi & John Kissa & Bosco Agaba & Fredrick Makumbi & Simon Kasasa & Penelope Vounatsou, 2017. "Geostatistical modelling of malaria indicator survey data to assess the effects of interventions on the geographical distribution of malaria prevalence in children less than 5 years in Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Fabian Krüger & Sebastian Lerch & Thordis Thorarinsdottir & Tilmann Gneiting, 2021. "Predictive Inference Based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo Output," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(2), pages 274-301, August.
    12. Braun, Julia & Sabanés Bové, Daniel & Held, Leonhard, 2014. "Choice of generalized linear mixed models using predictive crossvalidation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 190-202.
    13. Christopher Gelpi & Nazli Avdan, 2018. "Democracies at risk? A forecasting analysis of regime type and the risk of terrorist attack," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 35(1), pages 18-42, January.
    14. Wei Wei & Leonhard Held, 2014. "Calibration tests for count data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(4), pages 787-805, December.
    15. Yuhyeong Jang & Raanju R. Sundararajan & Wagner Barreto-Souza & Elizabeth Wheaton-Paramo, 2024. "Determining economic factors for sex trafficking in the United States using count time series regression," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 337-354, July.
    16. Kheifets, Igor & Velasco, Carlos, 2017. "New goodness-of-fit diagnostics for conditional discrete response models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 135-149.
    17. Rossi, Barbara & Ganics, Gergely & Sekhposyan, Tatevik, 2020. "From Fixed-event to Fixed-horizon Density Forecasts: Obtaining Measures of Multi-horizon Uncertainty from Survey Density Foreca," CEPR Discussion Papers 14267, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Frank van Berkum & Katrien Antonio & Michel Vellekoop, 2021. "Quantifying longevity gaps using micro‐level lifetime data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(2), pages 548-570, April.
    19. Shi, Peng & Zhao, Zifeng, 2024. "Enhanced pricing and management of bundled insurance risks with dependence-aware prediction using pair copula construction," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(1).
    20. Gao, Lisa & Shi, Peng, 2022. "Leveraging high-resolution weather information to predict hail damage claims: A spatial point process for replicated point patterns," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 161-179.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0012782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.