IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0010360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic burden of dengue fever in China: A retrospective research study

Author

Listed:
  • Meng Xu
  • Nan Chang
  • Taotian Tu
  • Jimin Sun
  • Jinyong Jiang
  • Yu Xia
  • Wenge Tang
  • Hengqing Ji
  • Xiaotao Zhao
  • Jin Zhu
  • Li Qi
  • Xiaobo Liu
  • Qiyong Liu

Abstract

Background: Dengue fever has been a significant public health challenge in China. This will be particularly important in the context of global warming, frequent international travels, and urbanization with increasing city size and population movement. In order to design relevant prevention and control strategies and allocate health resources reasonably, this study evaluated the economic burden of dengue fever in China in 2019. Methods: The economic burden of dengue fever patients was calculated from both family and the organisation perspectives. A survey was conducted among 1,027 dengue fever patients in Zhejiang, Chongqing, and Yunnan Provinces. Treatment expenses, lost working days, and insurance reimbursement expenses information were collected to estimate the total economic burden of dengue fever patients in 2019. The expenditures related to dengue fever prevention and control from government, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), communities and subdistrict offices of 30 counties (or districts) in Zhejiang Province and Chongqing City were also collected. Results: The direct, indirect and total economic burden for dengue fever patients in 2019 in the three Provinces were about 36,927,380.00 Chinese Yuan (CNY), 10,579,572.00 CNY and 46,805,064.00 CNY, respectively. The costs for prevention and control of dengue fever for the counties (or districts) without cases, counties (or districts) with imported cases, and counties (or districts) with local cases are 205,800.00 CNY, 731,180.00 CNY and 6,934,378.00 CNY, respectively. The total investment of dengue fever prevention and control in the 30 counties in China in 2019 was approximately 3,166,660,240.00 CNY. Conclusion: The economic burden of dengue fever patients is relatively high, and medical insurance coverage should be increased to lighten patients’ direct medical economic burden. At the same time, the results suggests that China should increase funding for primary health service institutions to prevent dengue fever transmission. Author summary: Dengue fever is one of the most important arbovirus diseases in the world. The distribution of cases has also increased significantly with the number of affected areas the highest in history. Dengue fever mainly occurs in southern provinces in China and its epidemic showed a trend of high incidence in 2019. This study estimated the economic burden of dengue fever in China in 2019 from the perspectives of both family and organisation. We recruited 1,027 dengue fever patients from Zhejiang Province, Chongqing City and Yunnan Province. At the same time, the costs related to dengue fever prevention and control from governments, CDCs, communities and subdistrict offices of 30 counties located in Zhejiang Province and Chongqing City were also collected. The results showed that in family perspective, the total economic burden of dengue in 2019 is estimated to be 46,805,064.00 CNY. In terms of organization expenditures, the regions with a higher incidence had higher costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng Xu & Nan Chang & Taotian Tu & Jimin Sun & Jinyong Jiang & Yu Xia & Wenge Tang & Hengqing Ji & Xiaotao Zhao & Jin Zhu & Li Qi & Xiaobo Liu & Qiyong Liu, 2022. "Economic burden of dengue fever in China: A retrospective research study," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010360
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010360
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0010360&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margaret Chan & Michel Kazatchkine & Julian Lob-Levyt & Thoraya Obaid & Julian Schweizer & Michel Sidibe & Ann Veneman & Tadataka Yamada, 2010. "Meeting the Demand for Results and Accountability: A Call for Action on Health Data from Eight Global Health Agencies," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-4, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susan L. Greco & Anna Belova & Jin Huang, 2016. "Benefits of Decreased Mortality Risk from Reductions in Primary Mobile Source Fine Particulate Matter: A Limited Data Approach for Urban Areas Worldwide," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(9), pages 1783-1802, September.
    2. Valentin Seidler & Edson C. Utazi & Amelia B. Finaret & Sebastian Luckeneder & Gregor Zens & Maksym Bodarenko & Abigail W. Smith & Sarah E. K. Bradley & Andrew J. Tatem & Patrick Webb, 2025. "Subnational variations in the quality of household survey data in sub-Saharan Africa," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Cheryl Cashin, 2012. "Comparison of the Monitoring and Evaluation Systems of the World Bank and the Global Fund," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 26678, April.
    4. Peter Byass & Osman Sankoh & Stephen M Tollman & Ulf Högberg & Stig Wall, 2011. "Lessons from History for Designing and Validating Epidemiological Surveillance in Uncounted Populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-10, August.
    5. Lavinia Bianco & Salvatore Raffa & Paolo Fornelli & Rita Mancini & Angela Gabriele & Francesco Medici & Claudia Battista & Stefania Greco & Giuseppe Croce & Aldo Germani & Simona Petrucci & Paolo Anib, 2022. "From Survey Results to a Decision-Making Matrix for Strategic Planning in Healthcare: The Case of Clinical Pathways," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-30, June.
    6. Odgerel Chimed-Ochir & Diana Arachi & Tim Driscoll & Ro-Ting Lin & Jukka Takala & Ken Takahashi, 2020. "Burden of Mesothelioma Deaths by National Income Category: Current Status and Future Implications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Brianne Riehl & Hisham Zerriffi & Robin Naidoo, 2015. "Effects of Community-Based Natural Resource Management on Household Welfare in Namibia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    8. repec:plo:pone00:0027868 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Carr-Hill, Roy, 2013. "Missing Millions and Measuring Development Progress," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 30-44.
    10. Amanda Glassman, Denizhan Duran, 2012. "An Index of the Quality of Official Development Assistance in Health - Working Paper 287," Working Papers 287, Center for Global Development.
    11. Tanveer Ahmed Naveed & Imran Hussain Shah, 2024. "Assessing Child Health Disparities: Evidence from a Household-Based Health Index in Punjab, Pakistan," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(2), pages 779-814, April.
    12. Russell, Anna & Ghosh, Smita & Tiwari, Niharika & Valdez, Clarissa & Tally, Leigh & Templin, Lindsay & Pappas, Danielle & Gross, Samantha & Eskinder, Biniyam & Abayneh, Sisay Alemayehu & Kamga, Elizab, 2025. "Impact of a monitoring and evaluation training in 3 PEPFAR-supported countries," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0010360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.