IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0008805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economic impact and cost-effectiveness of combined vector-control and dengue vaccination strategies in Thailand: results from a dynamic transmission model

Author

Listed:
  • Gerhart Knerer
  • Christine S M Currie
  • Sally C Brailsford

Abstract

Background and aims: Dengue fever is a major public health problem in tropical/subtropical regions. Prior economic analyses have predominantly evaluated either vaccination or vector-control programmes in isolation and do not really consider the incremental benefits and cost-effectiveness of mixed strategies and combination control. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of single and combined approaches in Thailand. Methods: The impacts of different control interventions were analysed using a previously published mathematical model of dengue epidemiology and control incorporating seasonality, age structure, consecutive infection, cross protection, immune enhancement and combined vector-host transmission. An economic model was applied to simulation results to estimate the cost-effectiveness of 4 interventions and their various combinations (6 strategies): i) routine vaccination of 1-year olds; ii) chemical vector control strategies targeting adult and larval stages separately; iii) environmental management/ public health education and awareness [EM/ PHEA]). Payer and societal perspectives were considered. The health burden of dengue fever was assessed using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) lost. Costs and effects were assessed for 10 years. Costs were discounted at 3% annually and updated to 2013 United States Dollars. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out after strategies were rank-ordered by cost, with results presented in a table of incremental analysis. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were undertaken; and the impact and cost-effectiveness of Wolbachia was evaluated in exploratory scenario analyses. Results: From the payer and societal perspectives, 2 combination strategies were considered optimal, as all other control strategies were dominated. Vaccination plus adulticide plus EM/ PHEA was deemed cost-effective according to multiple cost-effectiveness criteria. From the societal perspective, incremental differences vs. adulticide and EM/ PHEA resulted in costs of $157.6 million and DALYs lost of 12,599, giving an expected ICER of $12,508 per DALY averted. Exploratory scenario analyses showed Wolbachia to be highly cost-effective ($343 per DALY averted) vs. other single control measures. Conclusions: Our model shows that individual interventions can be cost-effective, but that important epidemiological reductions and economic impacts are demonstrated when interventions are combined as part of an integrated approach to combating dengue fever. Exploratory scenario analyses demonstrated the potential epidemiological and cost-effective impact of Wolbachia when deployed at scale on a nationwide basis. Our findings were robust in the face of sensitivity analyses. Author summary: Dengue fever has become a major public health problem. It is considered one of the most important mosquito-borne viral diseases and occurs in >100 countries in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia-Pacific, the Americas, the Middle East, and Africa with >3 billion people at risk. Despite current control interventions against dengue fever in endemic countries, the disease is associated with considerable healthcare utilisation, personal costs to patients and caregivers, productivity loss and human suffering. Whilst the illness is well understood, there is also recognition that current control efforts focussing predominantly on Aedes aegypti control and elimination are less than optimal although may still have an important role to play in the short to medium term. In this study, we consider the cost-effectiveness of individual as well as mixed dengue control strategies in Thailand, embracing chemical interventions, public health education/ environmental control and paediatric vaccination using a dengue vaccine profile broadly consistent with (dengue) vaccines in late stage development. To anticipate the transition to possible new vector control technologies, we also carry out exploratory scenario analyses of the impact and cost-effectiveness of the release of Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes (which are less capable of spreading viruses). Our findings indicate that single dengue control interventions can be cost-effective weapons in reducing dengue infections, although their effectiveness may be additionally enhanced when combined.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerhart Knerer & Christine S M Currie & Sally C Brailsford, 2020. "The economic impact and cost-effectiveness of combined vector-control and dengue vaccination strategies in Thailand: results from a dynamic transmission model," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-32, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008805
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008805
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008805&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008805?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eunha Shim, 2017. "Cost-effectiveness of dengue vaccination in Yucatán, Mexico using a dynamic dengue transmission model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. A. Newall & M. Jit & R. Hutubessy, 2014. "Are Current Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds for Low- and Middle-Income Countries Useful? Examples from the World of Vaccines," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 525-531, June.
    3. Samir Bhatt & Peter W. Gething & Oliver J. Brady & Jane P. Messina & Andrew W. Farlow & Catherine L. Moyes & John M. Drake & John S. Brownstein & Anne G. Hoen & Osman Sankoh & Monica F. Myers & Dylan , 2013. "The global distribution and burden of dengue," Nature, Nature, vol. 496(7446), pages 504-507, April.
    4. David N Fisman & Ashleigh R Tuite, 2011. "Estimation of the Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination with Enhanced Effectiveness in Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-9, November.
    5. Donald S Shepard & Eduardo A Undurraga & Yara A Halasa, 2013. "Economic and Disease Burden of Dengue in Southeast Asia," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Céline Azémar & Rodolphe Desbordes, 2009. "Public Governance, Health and Foreign Direct Investment in Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 18(4), pages 667-709, August.
    7. Alsan, Marcella & Bloom, David E. & Canning, David, 2006. "The effect of population health on foreign direct investment inflows to low- and middle-income countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 613-630, April.
    8. Christopher Fitzpatrick & Alexander Haines & Mathieu Bangert & Andrew Farlow & Janet Hemingway & Raman Velayudhan, 2017. "An economic evaluation of vector control in the age of a dengue vaccine," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, August.
    9. Ary A Hoffmann & Inaki Iturbe-Ormaetxe & Ashley G Callahan & Ben L Phillips & Katrina Billington & Jason K Axford & Brian Montgomery & Andrew P Turley & Scott L O'Neill, 2014. "Stability of the wMel Wolbachia Infection following Invasion into Aedes aegypti Populations," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-9, September.
    10. Gerhart Knerer & Christine Currie & Sally Brailsford, 2015. "Impact of combined vector-control and vaccination strategies on transmission dynamics of dengue fever: a model-based analysis," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 205-217, June.
    11. Luis R Carrasco & Linda K Lee & Vernon J Lee & Eng Eong Ooi & Donald S Shepard & Tun L Thein & Victor Gan & Alex R Cook & David Lye & Lee Ching Ng & Yee Sin Leo, 2011. "Economic Impact of Dengue Illness and the Cost-Effectiveness of Future Vaccination Programs in Singapore," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Nina Alphey & Luke Alphey & Michael B Bonsall, 2011. "A Model Framework to Estimate Impact and Cost of Genetics-Based Sterile Insect Methods for Dengue Vector Control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-12, October.
    13. Carrasco, Luis R & Lee, Linda K & Lee, Vernon J & Ooi, Eng Eong & Shepard, Donald S & Thein, Tun L & Gan, Victor & Cook, Alex R & Lye, David & Ng, Lee Ching & Leo, Yee Sin, 2011. "Economic Impact of Dengue Illness and the Cost-Effectiveness of Future Vaccination Programs in Singapore," MPRA Paper 57761, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Eduardo A Undurraga & Yara A Halasa & Donald S Shepard, 2013. "Use of Expansion Factors to Estimate the Burden of Dengue in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guido España & Yutong Yao & Kathryn B Anderson & Meagan C Fitzpatrick & David L Smith & Amy C Morrison & Annelies Wilder-Smith & Thomas W Scott & T Alex Perkins, 2019. "Model-based assessment of public health impact and cost-effectiveness of dengue vaccination following screening for prior exposure," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Christopher Fitzpatrick & Alexander Haines & Mathieu Bangert & Andrew Farlow & Janet Hemingway & Raman Velayudhan, 2017. "An economic evaluation of vector control in the age of a dengue vaccine," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Eunha Shim, 2017. "Cost-effectiveness of dengue vaccination in Yucatán, Mexico using a dynamic dengue transmission model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Eduardo A Undurraga & Yara A Halasa & Donald S Shepard, 2013. "Use of Expansion Factors to Estimate the Burden of Dengue in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Le T P Nghiem & Tarek Soliman & Darren C J Yeo & Hugh T W Tan & Theodore A Evans & John D Mumford & Reuben P Keller & Richard H A Baker & Richard T Corlett & Luis R Carrasco, 2013. "Economic and Environmental Impacts of Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in Southeast Asia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-9, August.
    6. Mohd ‘Ammar Ihsan Ahmad Zamzuri & Farah Nabila Abd Majid & Rahmat Dapari & Mohd Rohaizat Hassan & Abd Majid Mohd Isa, 2022. "Perceived Risk for Dengue Infection Mediates the Relationship between Attitude and Practice for Dengue Prevention: A Study in Seremban, Malaysia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Rubini, Lauretta & Pollio, Chiara & Spigarelli, Francesca & Lv, Ping, 2021. "Regional social context and FDI. An empirical investigation on Chinese acquisitions in Europe," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 402-415.
    8. Donald S Shepard & Eduardo A Undurraga & Yara A Halasa, 2013. "Economic and Disease Burden of Dengue in Southeast Asia," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-12, February.
    9. Cleeve, Emmanuel A. & Debrah, Yaw & Yiheyis, Zelealem, 2015. "Human Capital and FDI Inflow: An Assessment of the African Case," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-14.
    10. Chiappini, Raphaël & Coupaud, Marine & Viaud, François, 2022. "Does attracting FDI affect population health? New evidence from a multi-dimensional measure of health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    11. Auliya A. Suwantika & Angga P. Kautsar & Woro Supadmi & Neily Zakiyah & Rizky Abdulah & Mohammad Ali & Maarten J. Postma, 2020. "Cost-Effectiveness of Dengue Vaccination in Indonesia: Considering Integrated Programs with Wolbachia -Infected Mosquitos and Health Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Elizabeth Asiedu & Yi Jin & Isaac K. Kanyama, 2015. "The impact of HIV/AIDS on foreign direct investment: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of African Trade, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Wooton, Ian & Darby, Julia & Desbordes, Rodolphe, 2009. "Does Public Governance Always Matter? How Experience of Poor Institutional Quality Influences FDI to the South," CEPR Discussion Papers 7533, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Pi Guo & Tao Liu & Qin Zhang & Li Wang & Jianpeng Xiao & Qingying Zhang & Ganfeng Luo & Zhihao Li & Jianfeng He & Yonghui Zhang & Wenjun Ma, 2017. "Developing a dengue forecast model using machine learning: A case study in China," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    15. Manjunath B Shankar & Rosa L Rodríguez-Acosta & Tyler M Sharp & Kay M Tomashek & Harold S Margolis & Martin I Meltzer, 2018. "Estimating dengue under-reporting in Puerto Rico using a multiplier model," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Burns, Darren K. & Jones, Andrew P. & Goryakin, Yevgeniy & Suhrcke, Marc, 2017. "Is foreign direct investment good for health in low and middle income countries? An instrumental variable approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 74-82.
    17. Polyxeni, Kechagia & Theodore, Metaxas, 2019. "An empirical investigation of FDI inflows in developing economies: Terrorism as a determinant factor," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    18. Adriana Zubieta-Zavala & Malaquias López-Cervantes & Guillermo Salinas-Escudero & Adrian Ramírez-Chávez & José Ramos Castañeda & Sendy Isarel Hernández-Gaytán & Juan Guillermo López Yescas & Luis Durá, 2018. "Economic impact of dengue in Mexico considering reported cases for 2012 to 2016," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Imad A. Moosa & Ebrahim Merza, 2022. "The effect of COVID-19 on foreign direct investment inflows: stylised facts and some explanations," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Juliane Sormain & Michael Ryan, 2023. "Regional healthcare infrastructure disparities and foreign direct investment into Europe," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 49-61.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.