IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0003005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inclusion of persons living with disabilities in a district-wide sanitation programme: A cross-sectional study in rural Malawi

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine Davies
  • Mindy Panulo
  • Clara MacLeod
  • Jane Wilbur
  • Tracy Morse
  • Kondwani Chidziwisano
  • Robert Dreibelbis

Abstract

Community-led total sanitation (CLTS) is embraced as a key strategy to achieve universal sanitation coverage (Sustainable Development Goal 6.2). Although inclusion is identified as a predictor of CLTS success, people living with disabilities are often excluded from community sanitation programmes and there is limited research exploring CLTS participation amongst people living with disabilities. This study aims to explore the extent to which people living with disabilities participated in a CLTS intervention delivered in rural Malawi using standard approaches. This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Chiradzulu district of Malawi. A household questionnaire was administered to collect information about CLTS participation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to compare participation in different CLTS activities between households with (n = 80) and without a member with a disability (n = 167), and between household members with (n = 55) and without a disability (n = 226). No difference in CLTS participation was observed at the household-level, but there were marked differences in CLTS participation between household members with and without a disability. Household members without a disability felt they could give more input in triggering activities (OR = 3.72, 95%CI 1.18–11.73), and reported higher participation in the transect walk (OR = 4.03, 95%CI 1.45–11.18), community action planning (OR = 2.89, 95%CI 1.36–6.13), and follow-up visits (OR = 3.37, 95%CI 1.78–6.40) compared to household members with disabilities. There was no difference in the likelihood of being invited to triggering (OR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.41–2.36), attending triggering (OR = 2.09, 95%CI 0.98–4.46), or participating in community mapping (OR = 2.38, 95%CI 0.71–7.98) between household members with and without a disability. This study revealed intra-household inequalities in CLTS participation. To improve participation in CLTS interventions, facilitators should be trained on action steps to make CLTS more inclusive. Further research could include an in-depth analysis of predictors of CLTS participation amongst people living with disabilities, including disability types, severity and age.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine Davies & Mindy Panulo & Clara MacLeod & Jane Wilbur & Tracy Morse & Kondwani Chidziwisano & Robert Dreibelbis, 2024. "Inclusion of persons living with disabilities in a district-wide sanitation programme: A cross-sectional study in rural Malawi," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003005
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003005&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zuin, Valentina & Delaire, Caroline & Peletz, Rachel & Cock-Esteb, Alicea & Khush, Ranjiv & Albert, Jeff, 2019. "Policy Diffusion in the Rural Sanitation Sector: Lessons from Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Rong Hoo & George Joseph & Rafael Rivera & Susanna Smets & Hanh Nguyen & Per Ljung & Sreymom Um & Georgia Davis & Jeff Albert, 2022. "Strategic complements: Poverty-targeted subsidy programs show additive benefits on household toilet purchases in rural Cambodia when coupled with sanitation marketing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Augsburg, Britta & Baquero, Juan P. & Gautam, Sanghmitra & Rodriguez-Lesmes, Paul, 2023. "Sanitation and marriage markets in India: Evidence from the Total Sanitation Campaign," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Saraswat, Deepak, 2024. "Gender composition of children and sanitation behavior in India," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Augsburg, Britta & Bancalari, Antonella & Durrani, Zara & Vaidyanathan, Madhav & White, Zach, 2022. "When nature calls back: Sustaining behavioral change in rural Pakistan," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    5. Chao Yang & Cui Huang, 2024. "Target-oriented policy diffusion analysis: a case study of China’s information technology policy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(3), pages 1347-1376, March.
    6. Abramovsky, Laura & Augsburg, Britta & Lührmann, Melanie & Oteiza, Francisco & Rud, Juan Pablo, 2023. "Community matters: Heterogeneous impacts of a sanitation intervention," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Valentina Zuin & Vandy Moung & Rachel Juay & Jessica Tribbe, 2024. "Jumping up the sanitation ladder in rural Cambodia: The role of remittances and peer-to-peer pressure in adopting high-quality latrines," PLOS Water, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Gautam, Sanghmitra & Gechter, Michael & Guiteras, Raymond P. & Mobarak, Ahmed Mushfiq, 2025. "To use financial incentives or not? Insights from experiments in encouraging sanitation investments in four countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Jessica Tribbe & Valentina Zuin & Caroline Delaire & Ranjiv Khush & Rachel Peletz, 2021. "How Do Rural Communities Sustain Sanitation Gains? Qualitative Comparative Analyses of Community-Led Approaches in Cambodia and Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Mohanty, Aatishya & Saxena, Akshar, 2023. "Diarrheal disease, sanitation, and culture in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    11. Cameron, Lisa & Santos, Paulo & Thomas, Milan & Albert, Jeff, 2021. "Sanitation, financial incentives and health spillovers: A cluster randomised trial," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    12. Hemez Ange Aurélien Kouassi & Harinaivo Anderson Andrianisa & Maïmouna Bologo Traoré & Seyram Kossi Sossou & Rikyelle Momo Nguematio & Maeva Dominique Djambou, 2023. "Acceptance Factors for the Social Norms Promoted by the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) Approach in the Rural Areas: Case Study of the Central-Western Region of Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Omololu Ebenezer Fagunwa & Thobile Mthiyane & Ayokunle Fagunwa & Kassim Idowu Olayemi & Alaoma Alozie & Helen Onyeaka & Adenike Akinsemolu & Adegbola Ojo, 2025. "Priority regions for eliminating open defecation in Africa: implications for antimicrobial resistance," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 2675-2699, January.
    14. Nguyen, Cuong Viet & Phung, Tung Duc, 2024. "Financial incentives for sanitation take-up: A randomized control trial in rural Vietnam," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    15. Revilla, Ma. Laarni D. & Qu, Fangqi & Seetharam, K E & Rao, Bhanoji, 2021. "“Sanitation” in the Top Development Journals: A Review," ADBI Working Papers 1253, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    16. Pakhtigian, Emily L. & Pattanayak, Subhrendu K., 2024. "Social setting, gender, and preferences for improved sanitation: Evidence from experimental games in rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.