IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0000721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What If…? Pandemic policy-decision-support to guide a cost-benefit-optimised, country-specific response

Author

Listed:
  • Giorgio Mannarini
  • Francesco Posa
  • Thierry Bossy
  • Lucas Massemin
  • Javier Fernandez-Castanon
  • Tatjana Chavdarova
  • Pablo Cañas
  • Prakhar Gupta
  • Martin Jaggi
  • Mary-Anne Hartley

Abstract

Background: After 18 months of responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, there is still no agreement on the optimal combination of mitigation strategies. The efficacy and collateral damage of pandemic policies are dependent on constantly evolving viral epidemiology as well as the volatile distribution of socioeconomic and cultural factors. This study proposes a data-driven approach to quantify the efficacy of the type, duration, and stringency of COVID-19 mitigation policies in terms of transmission control and economic loss, personalised to individual countries. Methods: We present What If…?, a deep learning pandemic-policy-decision-support algorithm simulating pandemic scenarios to guide and evaluate policy impact in real time. It leverages a uniquely diverse live global data-stream of socioeconomic, demographic, climatic, and epidemic trends on over a year of data (04/2020–06/2021) from 116 countries. The economic damage of the policies is also evaluated on the 29 higher income countries for which data is available. The efficacy and economic damage estimates are derived from two neural networks that infer respectively the daily R-value (RE) and unemployment rate (UER). Reinforcement learning then pits these models against each other to find the optimal policies minimising both RE and UER. Findings: The models made high accuracy predictions of RE and UER (average mean squared errors of 0.043 [CI95: 0.042–0.044] and 4.473% [CI95: 2.619–6.326] respectively), which allow the computation of country-specific policy efficacy in terms of cost and benefit. In the 29 countries where economic information was available, the reinforcement learning agent suggested a policy mix that is predicted to outperform those implemented in reality by over 10-fold for RE reduction (0.250 versus 0.025) and at 28-fold less cost in terms of UER (1.595% versus 0.057%). Conclusion: These results show that deep learning has the potential to guide evidence-based understanding and implementation of public health policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Giorgio Mannarini & Francesco Posa & Thierry Bossy & Lucas Massemin & Javier Fernandez-Castanon & Tatjana Chavdarova & Pablo Cañas & Prakhar Gupta & Martin Jaggi & Mary-Anne Hartley, 2022. "What If…? Pandemic policy-decision-support to guide a cost-benefit-optimised, country-specific response," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(8), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000721
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000721
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000721&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhixian Lin & Christopher M. Meissner, 2020. "Health vs. Wealth? Public Health Policies and the Economy During Covid-19," NBER Working Papers 27099, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Terrence Iverson & Edward Barbier, 2021. "National and Sub-National Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Bratianu Constantin, 2020. "Toward understanding the complexity of the COVID-19 crisis: a grounded theory approach," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(s1), pages 410-423, October.
    3. Kai Fischer & J. James Reade & W. Benedikt Schmal, 2021. "The Long Shadow of an Infection: COVID-19 and Performance at Work," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2021-17, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    4. Basco, Sergi & Domènech, Jordi & Rosés, Joan R., 2021. "The redistributive effects of pandemics: Evidence on the Spanish flu," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Shoji, Masahiro & Cato, Susumu & Iida, Takashi & Ishida, Kenji & Ito, Asei & McElwain, Kenneth, 2020. "COVID-19 and Social Distancing in the Absence of Legal Enforcement: Survey Evidence from Japan," MPRA Paper 101968, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Du, Xinming & Tan, Elaine & Elhan-Kayalar, Yesim & Sawada, Yasuyuki, 2022. "Economic Impact of COVID-19 Containment Policies: Evidence Based on Novel Surface Heat Data from the People’s Republic of China," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 673, Asian Development Bank.
    7. Jan Krzysztof Solarz & Krzysztof Waliszewski, 2020. "Holistic Framework for COVID-19 Pandemic as Systemic Risk," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 340-351.
    8. Vadim Elenev & Luis E. Quintero & Alessandro Rebucci & Emilia Simeonova, 2021. "Direct and Spillover Effects from Staggered Adoption of Health Policies: Evidence from COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Orders," NBER Working Papers 29088, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Chrys Esseau-Thomas & Omar Galarraga & Sherif Khalifa, 2022. "Epidemics, pandemics and income inequality," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Gopi Shah Goda & Emilie Jackson & Lauren Hersch Nicholas & Sarah See Stith, 2023. "The impact of Covid-19 on older workers’ employment and Social Security spillovers," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 813-846, April.
    11. Dorota Janiszewska & Vilde Hannevik Lien & Dariusz Kloskowski & Luiza Ossowska & Christian Dragin-Jensen & Marianna Strzelecka & Grzegorz Kwiatkowski, 2021. "Effects of COVID-19 Infection Control Measures on the Festival and Event Sector in Poland and Norway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Juan Gabriel Brida & Emiliano Alvarez & Erick Limas, 2021. "Clustering of time series for the analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic evolution," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(3), pages 1082-1096.
    13. Hunt Allcott & Levi Boxell & Jacob C. Conway & Billy A. Ferguson & Matthew Gentzkow & Benjamin Goldman, 2020. "What Explains Temporal and Geographic Variation in the Early US Coronavirus Pandemic?," NBER Working Papers 27965, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Hu, Maggie R. & Lee, Adrian D. & Zou, Dihan, 2021. "COVID-19 and Housing Prices: Australian Evidence with Daily Hedonic Returns," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    15. Ozkan, Aydin & Ozkan, Gulcin & Yalaman, Abdullah & Yildiz, Yilmaz, 2021. "Climate risk, culture and the Covid-19 mortality: A cross-country analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    16. Thuy D. Nguyen & Sumedha Gupta & Martin S. Andersen & Ana I. Bento & Kosali I. Simon & Coady Wing, 2021. "Impacts of state COVID‐19 reopening policy on human mobility and mixing behavior," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 88(2), pages 458-486, October.
    17. Francetic, Igor, 2021. "Bad law or implementation flaws? Lessons from the implementation of the new law on epidemics during the response to the first wave of COVID-19 in Switzerland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(10), pages 1285-1290.
    18. Emilio Barucci & Francesca Grassetti, 2024. "Pandemic Crisis, Power and the Role of the State," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 415-424, April.
    19. Juranek, Steffen & Paetzold, Jörg & Winner, Hannes & Zoutman, Floris T., 2020. "Labor Market Effects of COVID-19 in Sweden and its Neighbors: Evidence from Novel Administrative Data," Discussion Papers 2020/8, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    20. Vincenzo Carrieri & Maria De Paola & Francesca Gioia, 2021. "The health-economy trade-off during the Covid-19 pandemic: Communication matters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.