IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and predicting individual variation in COVID-19 vaccine-elicited antibody response in the general population

Author

Listed:
  • Naotoshi Nakamura
  • Yurie Kobashi
  • Kwang Su Kim
  • Hyeongki Park
  • Yuta Tani
  • Yuzo Shimazu
  • Tianchen Zhao
  • Yoshitaka Nishikawa
  • Fumiya Omata
  • Moe Kawashima
  • Makoto Yoshida
  • Toshiki Abe
  • Yoshika Saito
  • Yuki Senoo
  • Saori Nonaka
  • Morihito Takita
  • Chika Yamamoto
  • Takeshi Kawamura
  • Akira Sugiyama
  • Aya Nakayama
  • Yudai Kaneko
  • Yong Dam Jeong
  • Daiki Tatematsu
  • Marwa Akao
  • Yoshitaka Sato
  • Shoya Iwanami
  • Yasuhisa Fujita
  • Masatoshi Wakui
  • Kazuyuki Aihara
  • Tatsuhiko Kodama
  • Kenji Shibuya
  • Shingo Iwami
  • Masaharu Tsubokura

Abstract

As we learned during the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccines are one of the most important tools in infectious disease control. To date, an unprecedentedly large volume of high-quality data on COVID-19 vaccinations have been accumulated. For preparedness in future pandemics beyond COVID-19, these valuable datasets should be analyzed to best shape an effective vaccination strategy. We are collecting longitudinal data from a community-based cohort in Fukushima, Japan, that consists of 2,407 individuals who underwent serum sampling two or three times after a two-dose vaccination with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Using the individually reconstructed time courses of the vaccine-elicited antibody response based on mathematical modeling, we first identified basic demographic and health information that contributed to the main features of the antibody dynamics, i.e., the peak, the duration, and the area under the curve. We showed that these three features of antibody dynamics were partially explained by underlying medical conditions, adverse reactions to vaccinations, and medications, consistent with the findings of previous studies. We then applied to these factors a recently proposed computational method to optimally fit an “antibody score”, which resulted in an integer-based score that can be used as a basis for identifying individuals with higher or lower antibody titers from basic demographic and health information. The score can be easily calculated by individuals themselves or by medical practitioners. Although the sensitivity of this score is currently not very high, in the future, as more data become available, it has the potential to identify vulnerable populations and encourage them to get booster vaccinations. Our mathematical model can be extended to any kind of vaccination and therefore can form a basis for policy decisions regarding the distribution of booster vaccines to strengthen immunity in future pandemics.Author summary: This study investigates the dynamics of antibody responses following COVID-19 vaccination, with the aim of elucidating individual-level variability in immune responses. Using a mathematical model and longitudinal antibody measurements from a vaccination cohort in Fukushima, Japan, we reconstructed the time course of antibody dynamics after vaccination. The study showed that not everyone’s immune system responds equally to the vaccine. Some people may have lower antibody levels after vaccination, which could make them more susceptible to disease. We identified key factors that influence antibody responses, such as age, adverse reactions, comorbidities and medication use, and developed a personalized antibody score to predict individual antibody levels. These factors play a critical role in shaping the immune landscape following vaccination, highlighting the need for tailored approaches to assessing vaccine efficacy and recommending booster doses for vulnerable populations. The development of a personalized antibody score provides a practical tool for healthcare professionals to stratify individuals based on their predicted antibody levels, facilitating targeted interventions to enhance immune protection. The study underscores the importance of considering personal characteristics when assessing vaccine efficacy and suggests potential applications in guiding booster vaccination strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Naotoshi Nakamura & Yurie Kobashi & Kwang Su Kim & Hyeongki Park & Yuta Tani & Yuzo Shimazu & Tianchen Zhao & Yoshitaka Nishikawa & Fumiya Omata & Moe Kawashima & Makoto Yoshida & Toshiki Abe & Yoshik, 2024. "Modeling and predicting individual variation in COVID-19 vaccine-elicited antibody response in the general population," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000497
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000497
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000497&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000497?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junqing Xie & Shuo Feng & Xintong Li & Ester Gea-Mallorquí & Albert Prats-Uribe & Dani Prieto-Alhambra, 2022. "Comparative effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 vaccines against Covid-19 in people over 50," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Laura Pérez-Alós & Jose Juan Almagro Armenteros & Johannes Roth Madsen & Cecilie Bo Hansen & Ida Jarlhelt & Sebastian Rask Hamm & Line Dam Heftdal & Mia Marie Pries-Heje & Dina Leth Møller & Kamille F, 2022. "Modeling of waning immunity after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and influencing factors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Solís Arce, Julio S. & Warren, Shana S. & Meriggi, Niccolò F. & Scacco, Alexandra & McMurry, Nina & Voors, Maarten & Syunyaev, Georgiy & Malik, Amyn Abdul & Aboutajdine, Samya & Adeojo, Opeyemi & Anig, 2021. "COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in low- and middle-income countries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27, pages 1-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borisova, Ekaterina & Gründler, Klaus & Hackenberger, Armin & Harter, Anina & Potrafke, Niklas & Schoors, Koen, 2023. "Crisis experience and the deep roots of COVID-19 vaccination preferences," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Soheil Shayegh & Javier Andreu-Perez & Caroline Akoth & Xavier Bosch-Capblanch & Shouro Dasgupta & Giacomo Falchetta & Simon Gregson & Ahmed T Hammad & Mark Herringer & Festus Kapkea & Alvaro Labella , 2023. "Prioritizing COVID-19 vaccine allocation in resource poor settings: Towards an Artificial Intelligence-enabled and Geospatial-assisted decision support framework," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-11, August.
    3. Joseph Pateras & Preetam Ghosh, 2022. "A Computational Framework for Exploring SARS-CoV-2 Pharmacodynamic Dose and Timing Regimes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Junqing Xie & Beatriz Mothe & Marta Alcalde Herraiz & Chunxiao Li & Yu Xu & Annika M. Jödicke & Yaqing Gao & Yunhe Wang & Shuo Feng & Jia Wei & Zhuoyao Chen & Shenda Hong & Yeda Wu & Binbin Su & Xiaoy, 2024. "Relationship between HLA genetic variations, COVID-19 vaccine antibody response, and risk of breakthrough outcomes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Abanoub Riad & Anna Jouzová & Batuhan Üstün & Eliška Lagová & Lukáš Hruban & Petr Janků & Andrea Pokorná & Jitka Klugarová & Michal Koščík & Miloslav Klugar, 2021. "COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance of Pregnant and Lactating Women (PLW) in Czechia: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Wen Jiao & Peter Johannes Schulz & Angela Chang, 2024. "Addressing the role of eHealth literacy in shaping popular attitudes towards post-COVID-19 vaccination among Chinese adults," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Josh Bullock & Justin E. Lane & F. LeRon Shults, 2022. "What causes COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? Ignorance and the lack of bliss in the United Kingdom," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    8. Wu, Jian & Shen, Zhanlei & Li, Quanman & Tarimo, Clifford Silver & Wang, Meiyun & Gu, Jianqin & Wei, Wei & Zhang, Xinyu & Huang, Yanli & Ma, Mingze & Xu, Dongyang & Ojangba, Theodora & Miao, Yudong, 2023. "How urban versus rural residency relates to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A large-scale national Chinese study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    9. Bonsang, Eric & Pronkina, Elizaveta, 2023. "Family size and vaccination among older individuals: The case of COVID-19 vaccine," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    10. Hess, Stephane & Lancsar, Emily & Mariel, Petr & Meyerhoff, Jürgen & Song, Fangqing & van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline & Alaba, Olufunke A. & Amaris, Gloria & Arellana, Julián & Basso, Leonardo J. & Ben, 2022. "The path towards herd immunity: Predicting COVID-19 vaccination uptake through results from a stated choice study across six continents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    11. (Kevin) Li, Shaobo & Chen, Nuoya & Chan, Elaine & Guo, Yang (Jenny), 2024. "Loss framing increases entity theorists’ vaccine uptake," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 745-760.
    12. Armand, Alex & Augsburg, Britta & Bancalari, Antonella & Kameshwara, Kalyan Kumar, 2024. "Religious proximity and misinformation: Experimental evidence from a mobile phone-based campaign in India," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    13. Bussolo, Maurizio & Sarma, Nayantara & Torre, Iván, 2023. "The links between COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and non-pharmaceutical interventions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    14. Archchun Ariyarajah & Isha Berry & Victoria Haldane & Miranda Loutet & Fabio Salamanca-Buentello & Ross E G Upshur, 2022. "Identifying priority challenges and solutions for COVID-19 vaccine delivery in low- and middle-income countries: A modified Delphi study," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(9), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Islam, Asad & Kusnadi, Gita & Rezki, Jahen & Sim, Armand & van Empel, Giovanni & Vlassopoulos, Michael & Zenou, Yves, 2024. "Addressing vaccine hesitancy using local ambassadors: A randomized controlled trial in Indonesia," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    16. Nicholls, Nicky & Pleace, Michelle & Yitbarek, Eleni, 2024. "Trust in government, social media and willingness to vaccinate," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    17. Mishaal M. Almutairi & Mohammad Yamin & George Halikias & Adnan Ahmed Abi Sen, 2021. "A Framework for Crowd Management during COVID-19 with Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Albornoz, Facundo & Bottan, Nicolas & Cruces, Guillermo & Hoffmann, Bridget & Lombardi, María, 2024. "Backlash against expert recommendations: Reactions to COVID-19 advice in Latin America," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    19. Armand, Alex & Augsburg, Britta & Bancalari, Antonella & Kameshwara, Kalyan Kumar, 2022. "Social Proximity and Misinformation: Experimental Evidence from a Mobile Phone-Based Campaign in India," CEPR Discussion Papers 16492, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Maureen Ayikoru, & Cole, Jennifer & Dodds, Klaus & Atcero, Milburga & Bada, Joseph K. & Petrikova, Ivica & Worodria, William, 2023. "Addressing vaccine concerns through the spectrum of vaccine acceptance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.