IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pclm00/0000327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What constitutes “institutional arrangements” for Member State reporting within the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement?

Author

Listed:
  • Jacinta Barrins
  • Peter C McKeown
  • Una Murray
  • Charles Spillane

Abstract

All Member States are expected to put in place sustainable institutional arrangements for implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Paris Agreement, and to describe these in their reporting transparency obligations. Institutional arrangements provide the mechanism by which work gets visioned, planned, coordinated, implemented, monitored and reported on and are therefore fundamental to implementing the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement. Without sustainable institutional arrangements, implementation of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) will be jeopardised. Consequently, it is important to clearly identify what constitutes institutional arrangement, both from the perspective of reporting of what is in place and what is optimal for just transitions to achieve UNFCCC and Paris Agreement goals. The Consultative Group of Experts (CGE) and UNFCCC recommend five separate components for describing institutional arrangements for Member States to support their measurement, verification and reporting (MRV), as well as for climate action transparency and support. These components are: i) organization mandates; (ii) expertise; (iii) data flows; (iv) systems and tools; and (v) stakeholder engagement. In this study, we propose that describing institutional arrangements is akin to describing the components of an organisation (e.g. a government, ministry or agency). The Star Organisational Model, with its five inter-linked components of strategy, structure, processes, people and rewards is a useful additional approach for defining what constitutes institutional arrangements. Establishing sustainable institutional arrangements is challenging for developing countries, and yet critical for implementing the UNFCCC-Paris Agreement at country level. By applying the Star model to six developing countries to ascertain its usefulness for reporting on institutional arrangements related to MRV, we conclude that the Star Model offers a valuable additional method for more effectively delineating and documenting institutional arrangements, including describing existing organisational arrangements and envisioning ideal setups, in the context of the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement agendas.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacinta Barrins & Peter C McKeown & Una Murray & Charles Spillane, 2025. "What constitutes “institutional arrangements” for Member State reporting within the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement?," PLOS Climate, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000327
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000327
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/climate/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000327&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jody Zall Kusek & Ray C. Rist, 2004. "Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System : A Handbook for Development Practitioners," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14926, April.
    2. John M. Bryson & Lauren Hamilton Edwards & David M. Van Slyke, 2018. "Getting strategic about strategic planning research," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 317-339, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. World Bank Group, 2016. "Linking Farmers to Markets through Productive Alliances," World Bank Publications - Reports 25752, The World Bank Group.
    2. Chumasande Lalendle & Leila Goedhals-Gerber & Joubert van Eeden, 2021. "A Monitoring and Evaluation Sustainability Framework for Road Freight Transporters in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Francesca Imperiale & Alessandro Sancino & Roberta Fasiello & Paolo Ricci, 2024. "Governing public heritage assets with civil society: exploring the typologies of collaboration by the dominant actor," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(4), pages 1151-1197, December.
    4. Richard Douglas Kamara, 2020. "Outcomes-based performance management through measuring indicators: Collaborative governance for local economic development (LED) in South African municipalities," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Meghan Beck-O’Brien & Stefan Bringezu, 2021. "Biodiversity Monitoring in Long-Distance Food Supply Chains: Tools, Gaps and Needs to Meet Business Requirements and Sustainability Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Edwin Omondi Arwa & Prof. Charles M. Rambo, PhD & Dr. Isaac Abuya, PhD, 2021. "Participative stakeholder involvement approach and implementation of water projects in Kisumu East sub-county, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 8(12), pages 66-72, December.
    7. Shyam Singh & Nathalie Holvoet & Vivek Pandey, 2018. "Bridging Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility: Culture of Monitoring and Evaluation of CSR Initiatives in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Fabricio Esteban Espinoza Molina & Blanca del Valle Arenas Ramirez & Francisco Aparicio Izquierdo & Diana Carolina Zúñiga Ortega, 2021. "Road Safety Perception Questionnaire (RSPQ) in Latin America: A Development and Validation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    9. World Bank Group, 2017. "Driving Performance from the Center," World Bank Publications - Reports 26495, The World Bank Group.
    10. Rosalía Rodriguez-García & Elizabeth M. White, 2005. "Self-Assessment in Managing for Results: Conducting Self-Assessment for Development Practitioners," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7292, April.
    11. Independent Evaluation Group, 2006. "From Schooling Access to Learning Outcomes, An Unfinished Agenda : An Evaluation of World Bank Support to Primary Education," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7083, April.
    12. World Bank, 2013. "Dealing with GAC Issues in Project Lending : The Special Case of Fragile and Conflict-Affected States," World Bank Publications - Reports 16725, The World Bank Group.
    13. Lydia Nyambura & James Mutuiri & David Mutwiri & Jeffrey Maina & Dennis Njiru & Peterson Obara Magutu, 2018. "Lean Supply Chain Management Practices and Procurement Performance of Leading Supermarkets in Nairobi, Kenya," Noble International Journal of Business and Management Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 2(12), pages 101-112, December.
    14. Peter J. Baldacchino & Chantelle Camilleri & Simon Grima & Frank H. Bezzina, 2017. "Assessing Incentive and Monitoring Schemes in the Corporate Governance of Maltese Co-operatives," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 177-195.
    15. Ali Ahmed Ateeq Ali & Mahmoud AlZgool & Mohammed Alzoraiki & Marwan Milhem & Mujeeb Saif Mohsen Al-Absy, 2023. "Moderating Effect of Strategic Planning on the Relationship between Career Path Planning and Job Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Peter Gallo & Ján Dobrovič & Veronika Čabinová & Petra Pártlová & Jarmila Straková & Bohuslava Mihalčová, 2021. "Increasing the Efficiency of Enterprises in Tourism Sector Using Innovative Management Methods and Tools," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, April.
    17. Oana Luca & Florian Gaman & Emanuel Răuță, 2021. "Towards a National Harmonized Framework for Urban Plans and Strategies in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Elizaveta A. Belousova & Catherine I. Kaibicheva, 2022. "Prospects of incremental approach in strategic planning of rural municipalities’ socio-economic development," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 13(1), pages 49-67, March.
    19. Holvoet, N. & Renard, Robrecht, 2007. "Monitoring and evaluation under the PRSP: Solid rock or quicksand?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 66-81, February.
    20. Mahin Al Nahian, 2023. "Public Health Impact and Health System Preparedness within a Changing Climate in Bangladesh: A Scoping Review," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pclm00:0000327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: climate (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/climate .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.